Mexican Secure Border - Mutual Interests - Mutual Respect - Deal Maker Donald Trump Listens to the other side of the table. Mexico wants a secure border, it seems Donald Trump is the only one that ever ask them.

Mexican Secure Border - Mutual Interests - Mutual Respect - Deal Maker Donald Trump Listens to the other side of the table.  Mexico wants a secure border, it seems Donald Trump is the only one that ever ask them.

Operation Wetback

It's takes more than a few hours to make up for years of insults - Hillary Clinton - The great talker, that's the best she's got.  

Barack Obama's Illegal Alien Aunt

Hillary Clinton should know that its going to take years of Hillary Clinton in jail to make up for her hours of lying to the FBI and Congress.  Lesson Learned, never trust a Clinton because they're all the same, never ever give them the checkbook for America.

Crooked Hillary is all lawyer'ed up and packed for jail.

.

A Black Man can spot a Rattled Old White Women, Shaking like a deer, Hillary Clinton is rattled and proof was her speech today, rattled. Hillary Clinton is now in receipt of the Court Ordered Judicial Watch Questions and her responses are considered under oath as perjury is now at hand. Hillary Clinton, one lie leads to another, is shocked by the detailed questions and rattled that she is cornered into telling the truth, with the world watching. http://www.ClintonTarium.Com

Hillary Clinton is rattled and proof was her speech today, rattled.  Hillary Clinton is now in receipt of the Court Ordered Judicial Watch Questions and her responses are considered under oath as perjury is now at hand.  Hillary Clinton, one lie leads to another, is shocked by the detailed questions and rattled that she is cornered into telling the truth, with the world watching.  

http://www.ClintonTarium.Com

Hillary Clinton has now been caught in the biggest lies in America History.  The other Clinton Rats - Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills will most likely spend time in Federal Prison for their actions, illegal actions and false statements to federal investigators.  Hillary Clinton will never end up in jail but she will be retired from the National Political scene in total disgrace.  As Donald Trump is now in Mexico, meeting with the Mexican President, Hillary Clinton is really by God rattled by current events. 

Hillary Clinton Time Bomb Delivered by Judicial Watch Under Oath Questions District Court Ordered Responses by September 29th 2016 Hillary Clinton Cheryl Mills Huma Abedin Bill Clinton Barack Obama Clintonemail.com Clinton Foundation State Department Treason Corruption Bribes Extortion Blackmail Blackberry FBI NSA CIA DOJ DHS James Comey Loretta Lynch

Hillary Clinton Questions from Judicial Watch - Official - (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced it submitted questions to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices.  Clinton’s answers, under oath, are due on September 29.  On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and ordered Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….”  Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions.

The questions are:

1. Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.

2. Describe the creation of your clintonemail.com email account, including who decided to create it, when it was created, why it was created, and, if you did not set up the account yourself, who set it up for you.

3. When did you decide to use a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business and whom did you consult in making this decision?

4. Identify all communications in which you participated concerning or relating to your decision to use a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business and, for each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.

5. In a 60 Minutes interview aired on July 24, 2016, you stated that it was “recommended” you use a personal email account to conduct official State Department business. What recommendations were you given about using or not using a personal email account to conduct official State Department business, who made any such recommendations, and when were any such recommendations made?

6. Were you ever advised, cautioned, or warned, was it ever suggested, or did you ever participate in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that your use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business conflicted with or violated federal recordkeeping laws. For each instance in which you were so advised, cautioned or warned, in which such a suggestion was made, or in which such a discussion took place, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the advice, caution, warning, suggestion, or discussion.

7. Your campaign website states, “When Clinton got to the Department, she opted to use her personal email account as a matter of convenience.” What factors other than convenience did you consider in deciding to use a personal email account to conduct official State Department business? Include in your answer whether you considered federal records management and preservation requirements and how email you used to conduct official State Department business would be searched in response to FOIA requests.

8. After President Obama nominated you to be Secretary of State and during your tenure as secretary, did you expect the State Department to receive FOIA requests for or concerning your email?

9. During your tenure as Secretary of State, did you understand that email you sent or received in the course of conducting official State Department business was subject to FOIA?

10. During your tenure as Secretary of State, how did you manage and preserve emails in your clintonemail.com email account sent or received in the course of conducting official State Department business, and what, if anything, did you do to make those emails available to the Department for conducting searches in response to FOIA requests?

11. During your tenure as Secretary of State, what, if any, effort did you make to inform the State Department’s records management personnel (e.g., Clarence Finney or the Executive Secretariat’s Office of Correspondence and Records) about your use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business?

12. During your tenure as Secretary of State, did State Department personnel ever request access to your clintonemail.com email account to search for email responsive to a FOIA request? If so, identify the date access to your account was requested, the person or persons requesting access, and whether access was granted or denied.

13. At the time you decided to use your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business, or at any time thereafter during your tenure as Secretary of State, did you consider how emails you sent to or received from persons who did not have State Department email accounts (i.e., “state.gov” accounts) would be maintained and preserved by the Department or searched by the Department in response to FOIA requests? If so, what was your understanding about how such emails would be maintained, preserved, or searched by the Department in response to FOIA requests?

14. On March 6, 2009, Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Eric J. Boswell wrote in an Information Memo to your Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills, that he “cannot stress too strongly, however, that any unclassified BlackBerry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving email, and exploiting calendars.” A March 11, 2009 email states that, in a management meeting with the assistant secretaries, you approached Assistant Secretary Boswell and mentioned that you had read the “IM” and that you “get it.” Did you review the March 6, 2009 Information Memo, and, if so, why did you continue using an unclassified BlackBerry to access your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business? Copies of the March 6, 2009 Information Memo and March 11, 2009 email are attached as Exhibit A for your review.

15. In a November 13, 2010 email exchange with Huma Abedin about problems with your clintonemail.com email account, you wrote to Ms. Abedin, in response to her suggestion that you use a State Department email account or release your email address to the Department, “Let’s get a separate address or device.” Why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business after agreeing on November 13, 2010 to “get a separate address or device?” Include in your answer whether by “address” you meant an official State Department email account (i.e., a “state.gov” account) and by “device” you meant a State Department-issued BlackBerry. A copy of the November 13, 2010 email exchange with Ms. Abedin is attached as Exhibit B for your review.

16. Email exchanges among your top aides and assistants in August 30, 2011 discuss providing you with a State Department-issued BlackBerry or State Department email address. In the course of these discussions, State Department Executive Secretary Stephen Mull wrote, “[W]e are working to provide the Secretary per her request a Department issued BlackBerry to replace her personal unit which is malfunctioning (possibly because of her personal email server is down). We will prepare two versions for her to use – one with an operating State Department email account (which would mask her identity, but which would also be subject to FOIA requests).” Similarly, John Bentel, the Director of Information and Records Management in the Executive Secretariat, wrote, “You should be aware that any email would go through the Department’s infrastructure and [be] subject to FOIA searches.” Did you request a State Department issued Blackberry or a State Department email account in or around August 2011, and, if so, why did you continue using your personal device and clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business instead of replacing your device and account with a State Department-issued BlackBerry or a State Department email account? Include in your answer whether the fact that a State Department-issued BlackBerry or a State Department email address would be subject to FOIA affected your decision. Copies of the email exchanges are attached as Exhibit C for your review.

17. In February 2011, Assistant Secretary Boswell sent you an Information Memo noting “a dramatic increase since January 2011 in attempts . . . to compromise the private home email accounts of senior Department officials.” Assistant Secretary Boswell “urge[d] Department users to minimize the use of personal web-email for business.” Did you review Assistant Secretary Boswell’s Information Memo in or after February 2011, and, if so, why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business? Include in your answer any steps you took to minimize use of your clintonemail.com email account after reviewing the memo. A copy of Assistant Secretary Boswell’s February 2011 Information Memo is attached as Exhibit D for your review.

18. On June 28, 2011, you sent a message to all State Department personnel about securing personal email accounts. In the message, you noted “recent targeting of personal email accounts by online adversaries” and directed all personnel to “[a]void conducting official Department business from your personal email accounts.” Why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business after June 28, 2011, when you were advising all State Department Personnel to avoid doing so? A copy of the June 28, 2011 message is attached as Exhibit E for your review.

19. Were you ever advised, cautioned, or warned about hacking or attempted hacking of your clintonemail.com email account or the server that hosted your clintonemail.com account and, if so, what did you do in response to the advice, caution, or warning?

20. When you were preparing to leave office, did you consider allowing the State Department access to your clintonemail.com email account to manage and preserve the official emails in your account and to search those emails in response to FOIA requests? If you considered allowing access to your email account, why did you decide against it? If you did not consider allowing access to your email account, why not?

21. After you left office, did you believe you could alter, destroy, disclose, or use email you sent or received concerning official State Department business as you saw fit? If not, why not?

22. In late 2014, the State Department asked that you make available to the Department copies of any federal records of which you were aware, “such as an email sent or received on a personal email account while serving as Secretary of State.” After you left office but before your attorneys reviewed the email in your clintonemail.com email account in response to the State Department’s request, did you alter, destroy, disclose, or use any of the email in the account or authorize or instruct that any email in the account be altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used? If so, describe any email that was altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used, when the alteration, destruction, disclosure, or use took place, and the circumstances under which the email was altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used? A copy of a November 12, 2014 letter from Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick F. Kennedy regarding the State Department’s request is attached as Exhibit F for your review.

23. After your lawyers completed their review of the emails in your clintonemail.com email account in late 2014, were the electronic versions of your emails preserved, deleted, or destroyed? If they were deleted or destroyed, what tool or software was used to delete or destroy them, who deleted or destroyed them, and was the deletion or destruction done at your direction?

24. During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

25. Identify all communications between you and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account, including any instruction or direction to Mr. Pagliano about the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of emails in your account when transferring the clintonemail.com email system to any alternate or replacement server. For each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.

“These are simple questions about her email system that we hope will finally result in straight-forward answers, under oath, from Hillary Clinton,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

In his opinion ordering Clinton to answer written questions under oath Judge Sullivan wrote:

The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the clintonemail.com system for State Department business.

In its July 2016 request to depose Hillary Clinton, Judicial Watch argued:

Secretary Clinton’s deposition is necessary to complete the record. Although certain information has become available through investigations by the Benghazi Select Committee, the FBI, and the State Department Inspector General, as well as through Plaintiff’s narrowly tailored discovery to date, significant gaps in the evidence remain. Only Secretary Clinton can fill these gaps, and she does not argue otherwise.

***

To [Judicial Watch’s] knowledge, Secretary Clinton has never testified under oath why she created and used the clintonemail.com system to conduct official government business. Her only public statements on the issue are unsworn.

Judge Sullivan also ordered that Judicial Watch may depose the former Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-IRM”) John Bentel by October 31.

The questions and deposition arise in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit before Judge Sullivan first filed in September 2013 seeking records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton.  The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system. (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).

Judicial Watch has already taken the deposition testimony of seven Clinton aides and State Department officials.

For further information on this case, click here.

U.S. Internal War Footing - Islamic Radicals - Obama Clinton Failures - These 10,000 Islamic walk-away's have not been checked because they are no records to be checked before their arrival. The National Guard Units in your area is not trained or ready for an American soil battleground and neither is the U.S. Army, let alone your local police or sheriffs department. Support these groups, but buy guns and ammunition right now because tomorrow, or at least September 11, 2016 may be too late.

Americans are on a war footing, but not Obama or Clinton Terrorist Warning; September 11, 2016, A time for Islamic Radicals.  

John Kerry is getting America ready for a large terrorist attack, by making silly comments about the news media.  What he doesn't say, is the Barack Obama has the terrorist flood gates open from Pakistan, Syria, Iraq, Turkey and Afghanistan not to mention U.S. Open Border allowing Islamic Radical Jihadist warriors to come and go as the please without problems.  September 11th, 2016 is a day that you should ready your family with food, water, first-aid, weapons, guns, ammunition and specialized sheltering.

China, of all places, has already blocked Pakistan, Syria, Iraq, Turkey and Afghanistan travelers from staying in modest motels and expensive hotels through September 10th all across Communist China.

Barack Obama - Hillary Clinton has already allowed 10,000 Syrian walk-away's to enter America and Bill Clinton wants a foreign nation built inside America located in Detroit. 

Known Terrorist Locations

These 10,000 Islamic walk-away's have not been checked because they are no records to be checked before their arrival. The National Guard Units in your area is not trained or ready for an American soil battleground and neither is the U.S. Army, let alone your local police or sheriffs department.  Support these groups, but buy guns and ammunition right now because tomorrow, or at least September 11, 2016 may be too late.

The forbidden Image Picture of Bill Clinton Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin Wedding.

 This picture has been scrubbed from the web, right click image and save to your hard drive.  The Clinton don't want people to know that the Clintons and Perverted Anthony and Huma Abedin Weiner are of the best friends... Shocking

God Save the United States of America

Protect your family.

.

If Lies were Flies Hillary Clinton would be surrounded by a swarm. Hillary Clinton is always hatching lies for profits, fame and power as the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statements about her emails, about her health, about Benghazi, about the Clinton Foundation, about her husband's lovers have always been a swarm of lies and now they're out of the glass jars she had hidden in the barn.

If Lies were Flies Hillary Clinton would be surrounded by a swarm.  Hillary Clinton is always hatching lies for profits, fame and power as the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statements about her emails, about her health, about Benghazi, about the Clinton Foundation, about ObamaCare, about her husband's lovers have always been a swarm of lies and now they're out of the glass jars she had hidden in the barn.

Everything Hillary Clinton said yesterday and might say today is based on the meshing of all her lies over the years.

Her own independent career is really just another Clinton unique enterprise, based on corruption, influence peddling and making a lot of money.

We all know that Clinton lies are born in the laboratory of Bill and Hillary Clinton corrupt brains first and then they're hatched for different reasons.  All the Clinton lies are born under the exact same conditions and their breeding will always lead to more and more lies. 

These winged lies have always been carefully kept in glass jars where people could see them but never touch them until now.

Everything Hillary Clinton has said is a lie.

A bunch of lies.

A swarm of lies.

Hillary Clinton was the creator of the go-anywhere lie but her email history is the proof that everybody needed.  She sold us out to the highest bidder, sold her office, sold her influence which is the reason not one achievement can be named.

Her Lies no longer fly and even the amateur reporter can now write Hillary Clinton's story.

Chobani, It's Time To End Corrupt Success of Chobani, the greek yogurt company. Clinton Foundation Hamdi Ulukaya Tukish Hillary Clinton Bill Clinton Globalist Warren Buffet Chobani Yogurt

Hamdi Ulukaya, the Turkish-born billionaire best known for having founded the United States’ largest greek yogurt company, Chobani, has ties to both Bill and Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Global Initiative, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and a host of other globalist corporatist figures including Warren Buffet. Chobani’s factory in Twin Falls – the world’s largest yogurt factory – has been at the center of Breitbart News’ investigative series into the small town’s refugee resettlement program.

According to CNN Money: starting in 2008, Chobani began to hire refugees to work in its upstate New York plant – and listening to Ulukaya speak at events like the Clinton Global Initiative and Davos, one can tell that the issue closest to his heart is refugee resettlement. 

The Chobani billionaire’s many speeches and soliloquies on the issue of refugees combined with his extensive political connections may explain why establishment politicians, both Republican and Democrat, have swooned over Ulukaya, positively giddy to form “business / government partnerships” with him and to support his position on refugees.  

Many people first heard about the Twin Falls refugee resettlement program when a five-year-old girl was raped at the hands of three refugee boys. More recently, a Muslim refugee molested a mentally retarded woman. Those stories led to a look at the wider conditions that led to refugee resettlement in the state of Idaho, a situation connected to the drive for cheap labor by the local food processing industry that Chobani is a major part of. 

Who is Hamdi Ulukaya? His Forbes bio says:

Hamdi Ulukaya, the Turkish founder of America’s most popular Greek yogurt, Chobani, came to the U.S in 1994 to study business. Seeing that yogurt wasn’t as natural and nutritious as it was at home, Ulukaya created his own recipe and has since made a fortune from the nation’s Greek yogurt craze. He started by buying a Kraft Foods yogurt plant in central New York state with a loan from the Small Business Administration in 2005. 

Although he’s hailed as an entrepreneur, in the era of globalism, big government and big business are intermeshed and the rise of Chobani is a prime example of this new reality. Hamdi Ulukaya has used local, state and federal resources of the United States government at every stage of his business growth. 

Even since the $800,000 Small Business Administration loan that Ulukaya took out to open his first factory, Ulukaya’s love affair with oligarchy has only grown.

Take a major source of revenue for Chobani: the federal school lunch program. Chobani is the main supplier of Greek yogurt for the federal school system, and Ulukaya had no problem greasing the wheels to make that happen, as the Albany Times Union reported last year:

With encouragement from (New York Senators) Schumer and Gellibrand, Ulukaya and other New York Greek yogurt players entered the Washington fray in 2012. They wanted to get into the USDA‘s $15 billion school lunch, breakfast and summer food programs.

But access to those programs is more than just a matter of a senator making a phone call to the secretary of agriculture. Federal regulations spell out a lengthy bureaucratic process for gaining admission.

Ulukaya and Chobani took the lead, enlisting a lobbying firm, Cornerstone Government, and the National Yogurt Association to help them through the technicalities. Agriculture experts on the staffs of Gillibrand and Schumer pitched in as well.

According to the website Open Secrets, Chobani has spent over $700,000 on their lobbying efforts since 2012.

In December 2012, Chobani opened its second U.S. production facility – the world’s largest yogurt plant in Twin Falls, Idaho – an announcement that brought out local politicians from the Twin Falls city Council, like then-Mayor Greg Lanting – who recently apologized for his attack on the family of the five-year-old refugee rape victim – as well as Idaho’s Republican Governor “Butch” Otter.

But one of Ulukaya’s biggest fans appears to be Bill Clinton. As Chobani’s owner began spending cash on lobbying and hobnobbing with the globalist smart set, he garnered effusive praise from the former President:

“It’s an astonishing story … it’s an amazing story … it’s breathtaking,” gushed former President Bill Clinton during a 2013 Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) panel discussion featuring Ulukaya.

Ulukaya has made a number of appearances at CGI, including a one-on-one with Bill Clinton in 2015 where Al-Monitor reported that Ulukaya spoke about advancing refugee migration into the U.S. and around the world, saying that “writing checks is not enough.”

Being an invited guest of the Clinton Global Initiative to push a refugee agenda wasn’t Ulukaya’s only globalist gig. In January 2016, CNN Money reported that Ulukaya officially launched his Tent Foundation, “a personal foundation focused on helping refugees,” listing its founding partners as including such big-name companies as “Airbnb, Ikea Foundation, MasterCard, LinkedIn, UPS Foundation and Western Union.” Also in January 2016, PR News Wire put up a press release stating that the Tent Foundation’s main three focuses will be some combination of “direct giving”, “generating employment opportunities for refugees”, and “incentivizing partners to source products and services from companies that employ refugees and their host communities, or support refugee causes.” This would include Chobani, Ulukaya’s own company.

Ulukaya used oligarchy buzzwords to say he founded the Tent Foundation, “a platform for corporate leaders to join forces to more effectively leverage the support, ingenuity and dynamism of the world’s businesses to help end the refugee crises.“ In September 2015, The Tent Foundation released a publication with Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta’s Center for American Progress titled Crisis in Context about the current state of refugee affairs around the world, according to CAP.

Longtime Clinton associate John Podesta is currently one of the key leaders of Hillary Clinton’s campaign for President. 

Ulukaya lives in the rarefied world of the “doing well while doing good” crowd, a loose affiliation of millionaires and billionaires whose supposed altruism always seems to pay off handsomely for them.

In May 2015, Chobani’s owner joined forces with the Giving Pledge: Now a billionaire, Ulukaya pledges the majority of his personal wealth “to help refugees and help bring an end to this humanitarian crisis.” He does this through the Giving Pledge, an organization started by Warren Buffett and Bill Gates. As a recent story by reporter Michael Patrick Leahy points out, Buffet also helped finance the local Twin Falls newspaper the Times-News, which has defended the refugee program and repeatedly attacks critics of the refugee program as racist:

The daily paper, which operates as, in effect, a local monopoly in the small southern Idaho city at the center of a sexual assault of a 5 -year-old American-born girl involving three Muslim refugee boys, is owned by Lee Enterprises, which received a $2.1 million loan in 2012 and another $9 million loan in 2013 from a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate controlled by globalist billionaire Warren Buffett, an ardent supporter who endorsed Hillary Clinton in December.

Though both loans appear to have been paid back, Berkshire Hathaway had a four percent ownership interest in Lee Enterprises in 2012, an equity interest which has diminished to less than one percent in 2016.

Refugee advocate Hamdi Ulukaya is also on the boards of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York – while still being a Turkish citizen – and has been named Eminent Advocate for the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR). In January 2016, the BBC reported that Ulukaya made an appearance at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he called on more businesses to begin taking in refugees as workers, stating that it is “mind-blowing” how little firms are doing to economically integrate refugees.  

Years of stroking the establishment paid off once again though for Ulukaya earlier this year when Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton released an official statement from the campaign praising Ulukaya, giving his company a vast amount of free media:

When Hamdi Ulukaya founded Chobani in upstate New York more than a decade ago, he knew that to build a strong company, he needed a strong workforce. That’s why from the beginning, he paid his employees salaries above minimum wage and offered health and retirement benefits, and hired hundreds of refugees who came to America, as he did, looking for a brighter future.

For those who think you can’t buy that kind of advertising, it seems that perhaps you can, after all. 

The Clinton Foundation - Tainted Money may be found from a DiCaprio Donation

The Clinton Foundation - Tainted Money may be found from a DiCaprio Donation - A Justice Department complaint claims that Red Granite Pictures — the production company co-founded by the Prime Minister of Malaysia’s stepson, Riza Aziz — used $238 million of 1MDB money to produce The Wolf of Wall Street, for which DiCaprio won a Golden Globe. Straumann is also demanding that the actor return the estimated $25 million he was paid to star in 2013 Martin Scorsese-directed movie.  Clinton has perfected foundation money moving to other foundations and you must wonder if DiCaprio is playing the same game, one hand to another, both hands dirty and blood on their hands.  FBI now curious how hundreds of millions of dollars move around the world.. without documents ....Hillary Clinton and DiCaprio, big pals. 

“Money was stolen from the treasury and went straight into Leo’s pocket,” Straumann said. “That is dirty money, and he should pay it back.”

United Nations to Monitor U.S. Elections November 8th The New American reports – http://www.ClintonTarium.Com A swarm of hundreds of United Nations-linked “international election monitors,” many of them hailing from nations ruled by repressive dictatorships, will descend on the United States this year to supervise and “monitor” America’s elections.

U.S.. Invasion Planned - Are You Ready, Unlawful 

United Nations to Monitor U.S. Elections November 8th

The New American reports – 
http://www.ClintonTarium.Com

A swarm of hundreds of United Nations-linked “international election monitors,” many of them hailing from nations ruled by repressive dictatorships, will descend on the United States this year to supervise and “monitor” America’s elections. 

The horde of international bureaucrats for the November elections will be 10 times larger — and probably even more controversial — than the smaller “monitoring” mission that sparked a national uproar in 2012. Last time around, Texas even threatened to arrest them, and for good reason. The mission by the international outfit, founded in large part by Yugoslavian and Soviet communists, is supposedly to combat alleged “voter suppression” by conservatives.

Of course, GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump has been suggesting for months that “Crooked Hillary,” as he refers to Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton, would try to rig the 2016 election. It is hardly a far-fetched prospect. Indeed, hacked e-mails from the Democrat Party leadership revealed a plot to rig the primaries in Clinton’s favor, forcing Democrat Party leaders to resign in disgrace. T

o deal with the potential for fraud by Clinton and the establishment behind her in the upcoming presidential elections, Trump is recruiting a nationwide network of poll watchers.

Ironically, though, a coalition of radical anti-American organizations and Clinton supporters claims that the UN-linked monitors are needed in case of Republican efforts to rig the vote — 

especially after the courts struck down as unconstitutional various federal schemes related to the misnamed “Voting Rights Act.”  

The news about the massive international observer mission comes amid growing fears about the Obama administration, which has been lawlessly supporting Clinton with federal resources while openly threatening to illegally nationalize America’s election systems under the guise of declaring them “critical infrastructure.” 

Read More:  http://www.thenewamerican.com