Hillary Rodahm Clinton is a lot more like Russian Dictator Stalin, but has a few leanings toward Adolf Hitler. The Bolshevik leader Leon Trotsky once described Stalinism as “the
perfect theory for glueing up the brain.” Which makes Hillary Clinton the perfect way to fu.k up a Democratic Republic. Hillary Clinton is an organized crime figure operating inside the centralized administrative government of Barack Obama.
What he (Trotsky) meant to dramatize was the
fact that a regime as monstrous as Stalin’s, Obama's and the pending Clinton's (again) which (Stalin) murdered 40 million people
and enslaved many times more, was nonetheless able to persuade progressives and
“social justice” advocates all over the world to act as its supporters and
defenders.
America has 46 million people living in poverty, so Obama and Clinton are starving them out, killing them slowly. America has 97 million people out of the workforce and they only reason they're not breaking into your home tonight for food is that Obama - Clinton feed them and house them using your money. The welfare state does not truly describe the Obama Clinton America, you now live in a giant concentration camp.
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, John Kerry, Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, George Soros, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Van Jones, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and others like to call themselves progressive democrats, which really means progressive socialists, which really means their little bastard communists, just like Stalin, not like Hitler. Hitler wanted all the Jews dead and Stalin wanted all the Germans killed and both wanted a total global war and world domination, like one world order.
These enlightened enablers of Stalin’s crimes included leading
intellectuals of the day, even Nobel Prize winners in the sciences and the arts
like Frederic Joliot-Curie and Andre Gide, which might remind you that Barack Obama was a Nobel Prize winner for nothing and now millions are migrating out the middle eastern war zones, hundreds of thousands have been killed, but the welfare Harvard graduate Barack Obama and Yale educated dip Hillary Clinton are covering their ass. Brilliant as they were, way back then during and before World War II they were
blind to the realities of the Stalinist regime and therefore of the virtues of
the societies they lived in.
Barack Obama has a Marshall Law future planned for you. All the sparks are flying he's just waiting for some nut job to toss gas on the flames, always burning. Barack Obama has re-distributed your wealth, forced you on a government centered health plan, North Korea is exploding Atomic weapons, Russian is marching in Crimea, Islamic Radicals are killing Americans across the United States, The Ukraine belongs to Putin, and while Obama wants to take your pistol.
What glued up their brains was the belief that a brave new world
of social justice – a world governed by progressive principles - existed in
embryo in Soviet Russia, and had to be defended by any means necessary. The blood clotting and brain damaged Hillary Clinton wants the pure power of dictatorship just like Barack Obama. They now control the media like dollar junkies ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN and yes, FOX news. You don't have an independent press, the very first step that Stalin and Hitler and even Mao would really appreciate. Step by Step, Shovel by Shovel, you're digging your own grave.
As a
result of this illusion, they put their talents and prestige at the service of
the totalitarian enemies of democracy, acting, in Trotsky’s words, as “frontier
guards” for the Stalinist empire. The little bastards like Black Lives Matter will burn down Baltimore, Chicago and Detroit and Obama Clinton will just send them taxpayer money to rebuild.
They continued their efforts even after the
Soviets conquered Eastern Europe, acquired nuclear weapons and initiated a
“cold war” with the West. Iran will have a nuclear weapon and North Korea lights one off every so often to remind us that they have atomic weapons that will destroy America, even Russia reminds us.
To the progressives seduced by Stalinism, democratic
America represented a greater evil than the barbaric police states of the
Soviet bloc. Obama Clinton is more dangerous today that Stalin - Hitler and Mao combined as they have created a State Capitalistic System and the big business, big government, big hollywood, big banks, big media, big union's and the other big's have gone along to gain wealth and prosperity.
Even half a century later a progressive culture still refers to
the formative phase of the Cold War as years of a “Red Scare” – as though the
fifth column of American progressives whose loyalties were to the Soviet enemy,
whose members included Soviet spies, was not a matter of serious concern, and
as though a nuclear-armed, rapacious Soviet empire did not pose a credible
threat.
How were these delusions of otherwise intelligent and
well-intentioned people possible? How were otherwise informed individuals able
to deny the obvious and support the most brutal and oppressive dictatorship in
history? How did they come to view a relatively humane, decent, democratic
society like the United States as evil, while regarding the barbarous communist
regime as its victim? The answer lies in the identification of Marxism with the
promise of social justice and the institution of progressive values, which will
take place in a magical socialist future. Defense of the progressive idea
trumped recognition of the reactionary fact.
Once the Stalin regime was identified with the imaginary
progressive future, everything followed – its status as a persecuted victim,
and its adversary’s role as a reactionary force standing in the way of the
noble aspiration. Every fault of the Stalin regime, every crime it committed if
not denied by progressives was attributed to the nefarious actions of its
enemies, most glaringly the United States. Once a promise of redemption is
juxtaposed to an imperfect real world actor, all of these responses become
virtually inevitable. Hence the glueing of the brain.
The Soviet Union is gone, and history has moved on. But the
Stalinist dynamic endures as the heritage of a post-Communist left, which
remains wedded to fantasies of an impossibly beautiful future that bring it
into collision with the flawed American present. This left is now the dominant
force in the Democratic Party. Its extreme disconnect from real world realities
is encapsulated in its support for the transparently racist movement called
Black Lives Matter, which attacks law enforcement and defends street predators,
excusing their crimes with the alibi that “white supremacists” create the
circumstances that make them commit criminal acts. This extremist movement has
the “strong support” of the entire spectrum of the “progressive” left
(including 46% of the Democratic Party, according to aWall Street Journal/NBC
news poll).
Black Lives Matter is a movement built on the fiction that police
have declared an open season on innocent blacks. According to progressive
fictions, police are the agents of a “white supremacist society” – a claim
alone that should make one wary of the sanity of those who advance it. Facts
belie the very basis of the claim that there is open hunting season on African
Americans. African American males, accounting for 6% of the population are
responsible for more than 40% of violent crimes. But a Washington Postreport
on all 980 police shootings of 2015 reveals that only 4% of fatal police
shootings involved white officers and black victims, while in three-quarters of
the incidents, cops were either under attack themselves or defending
civilians,” in other words,” as Michael Walsh observed in the NY Post,
they were “doing their jobs.”
One such job done by Officer Darren Wilson in the suburb city of
Ferguson, Missouri, became the launching point for the Black Lives Matter
movement and its malicious claim that innocent blacks were being wantonly
gunned down by racist police. The alleged “victim,” Michael Brown had just
committed a strong-armed robbery and refused to comply with Wilson’s order to
surrender. Instead the 300 lb street thug attacked Wilson in his vehicle, tried
to wrest his gun from him, and then walked away before turning and charging
him. Several warning shots failed to stop Brown, until one killed him.
Ignoring the facts, Black Lives Matter promoted the lie invented
by Brown’s robbery accomplice, that Brown had his hands up and was attempting
to surrender when he was shot. “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” quickly became the anthem
of the movement. But this lie was refuted not only by black eyewitnesses
testifying before the Grand Jury, and by forensic evidence, but by a review
conducted by the Holder Justice Department, otherwise bent on demonstrating the
existence of bigotry in the Ferguson police department. Meanwhile Black Lives
Matter went about setting fire to Ferguson, causing millions of dollars of
damage, because if there was no justice – no hanging of Wilson - there would be
no peace, as the now familiar lynch mob slogan framed it.
Black Lives Matter then
set about taking its crusade to other cities, most prominently to Baltimore,
where a career criminal named Freddie Gray became another cause célebre.
Gray had suffered fatal injuries inside a police van where only another captive
was present. As the Black Lives Matter inspired mobs began to gather in
“protest,” Baltimore’s black Democratic mayor ordered police to stand down
allowing them to destroy millions of dollars of property. The state’s black
Democratic prosecutor then indicted six officers, three of them African
American, on various ludicrous charges including first degree murder, although
none except the African American driver were in the van with Gray.
The immediate result of Black Lives Matter’s war on law
enforcement was an epidemic of crime, as police officers decided that
aggressive law enforcement was dangerous to their careers and lives. Homicides
in the St. Louis Ferguson area and in Baltimore jumped 60% setting records in
the annals of criminal mayhem. Virtually all the victims were blacks, revealing
the hypocrisy of a movement for which black lives didn’t really matter – the
attacks on the law enforcement and the “power structure” and on whites did.
How could any reasonable citizen – let alone one with progressive
aspirations - support a roving lynch mob like Black Lives Matter? How could
half the Democratic Party support a movement that condemns America as a white
supremacist society, disregarding the reality that the president and chief law
enforcement officer and thousands of civil servants and elected officials
including the mayors and police chiefs of large urban centers, like Memphis,
Atlanta, and Philadelphia are black? (In Detroit the new mayor is actually the
first white mayor in 40 years, while its police chief is still black). You can
embrace the absurdity that America is a white supremacist society only if you
are afflicted with the illusion that everybody is the same and all statistical
inequalities affecting African Americans, like high crime rates, are not
reflections of culture and character but marks of racist oppression. (This
particular absurdity - universal as it is among American progressives and the
current U.S. Department of Justice - is easily refuted: If statistical
disparities proved racism, the National Basketball Association in which 95% of
the starting multimillionaires are black would be an association controlled by
black racists, as would the National Football League, while the National Hockey
League would be under the thumb of white racists.) Progressives are delusional
about black racism and black crime because they are in thrall to the vision of
an imaginary progressive future in which social justice will guarantee that
every individual outcome is the same.
Blindness to the accountability of inner city populations for
their off the charts violent crime rates, and their failures to shoulder the
responsibilities of parenthood is as characteristic of the progressive attitude
as is its blindness to the betrayal of inner city communities by Democrats and
progressives. The disgraceful conditions of America’s large inner cities is
almost entirely the responsibility of these two political actors. Chicago,
Detroit, Baltimore, St. Louis and numerous other sites of out-of-control black
poverty, failed public school systems and black on black violence are 100%
controlled by the Democratic Party and have been for 50 to 100 years. Yet 95%
of the black vote and 100% of the progressive vote continues to go to Democrats
who oppress African Americans.
Progressives’ sordid history of supporting criminals at home is
accompanied by an equally dishonorable record of sympathy for America’s enemies
abroad. The Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, was one of the monsters of the 20th Century,
launching two aggressive wars, dropping poison gas on the Kurds, and murdering
300,000 Iraqi citizens. But more than a million progressives poured into the
streets of America to thwart our attempt to depose him. At first, the
Democratic leadership supported the Iraq invasion as a just and necessary war.
But three months into the war, with American men and women still in harm’s way,
under pressure from the progressive left they turned against the war they had
authorized, and for the next five years, conducted a malicious propaganda
campaign, worthy of the enemy, to discredit America’s intentions and to
obstruct its military mission.
Because the Bush administration chose not to defend itself by
confronting the treasonous actions of the left – including the exposure and
destruction of three national security programs – leftist myths about the Iraq
War persist to this day, even in Republican circles. To set the record
straight: Bush did not lie to seduce Democrats into supporting the war, and
could not have done so, since the Democrats had access to the same intelligence
he did. The war was not about stockpiles of Weapons of Mass Destruction, as
Democrats dishonestly claimed – it was about Saddam’s violation of 17 UN
Security Council resolutions designed to prevent him from pursuing the WMD
weapons programs he had started. The Democrats’ betrayal of their country’s war
effort crippled its progress, and with the election to the presidency of an
anti-war leftist in 2009, led directly to the explosion of terrorism and
bloodshed that has since engulfed the Middle East.
Nor was it just the surrender mentality of the Obama
administration that fueled these catastrophes. With the full support of the
Democratic Party, President Obama embraced the Muslim Brotherhood and America’s
mortal enemy, Iran, providing its Ayatollahs with a path to nuclear weapons and
dominance of the region, and causing the Sunni Arab states to prepare for a
Middle Eastern civil war.
Just as leftists acted as propagandists for the Soviet empire,
discrediting America’s Cold War effort and conducting deceptive campaigns to
hide Soviet crimes, so the left today disparages the Islamic threat and opposes
security measures necessary to protect the homeland – most alarmingly the
sealing of our southern border. Progressives have created seditious “Sanctuary
Cities,” which refuse to cooperate with Homeland Security and the immigration
laws in more than three hundred outlaw municipalities under Democratic control.
Their betrayal has gone un-reversed for more than a decade and led to the
needless deaths of numerous Americans at the hands of illegal alien criminals,
of which there are more than 200,000 inside our jails alone, and obviously many
more inside our borders.
Leftists and Democrats have also joined the Islamic propaganda
campaign to represent Muslims – whose co-religionists have killed hundreds of
thousands of innocents since 9/11 in the name of their religion – as victims of
anti-Muslim prejudice, denouncing critics of Islamic terror and proponents of
security measures as “Islamophobes” and bigots. In fact, 60% of religious hate
crimes are directed at Jews, many inspired by the Jew-hatred that forms a core
of Islam’s religious canon, along with its incitements to war against
Christians and other non-Muslim “infidels.” “Imagine where the Jews would be,”
asks Don Feder, “if a Jewish civil servant and his foreign bride shot up a
Christmas party in Southern California. A Jewish psychiatrist murdered 13 and
wounded another 30 at Ft. Hood, and two Jewish brothers planted bombs at the
finish line of the Boston Marathon.” Yet for progressives no heinous act by
Islamic terrorists, nor deafening silence by Islamic communities in the face of
the atrocities committed in the name of their religion, can prompt them to
consider the problematic nature of Islam itself.
Exploiting the myth of Muslim persecution, progressives oppose
scrutiny of the Muslim community, including its terror-promoting Imams and
mosques. They immediately denounce proposals to screen Muslim immigrants as
religious bigotry, and thus seal off any rational discussion of the problem.
Led by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, Democrats have enabled the Islamic
assault on free speech, which is a central component of their campaign to
create a religious theocracy that circles the globe. Most notoriously the
president and his operatives cynically spread the lie that a video about
Muhammad was behind the Benghazi terror attack. Speaking like an Ayatollah
before the UN General Assembly, shortly after the attack, Obama declared: “The
future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” What an
American president should have said is, “The future must not belong to those
who murder in the name of Islam.”
By actions such as these, Democrats not only betray the 320
million Americans they are obliged to protect, but encourage the silence of the
Muslim community, which has failed to expose the terrorists in its midst, or
condemn the Imams and mosques that are preaching hatred of Jews and Christians,
and promoting terrorist agendas aimed at Americans.
Our country is at a perilous crossroads, one that is made
immeasurably more dangerous by a treacherous national party, which blames its
own country for the crimes of its enemies, and by a political opposition too
feckless and timid to hold its fellow citizens accountable for their treasonous
acts.
