Barack Obama; They knew nothing of their
daughter having sex with a black man, recognized the black child as their own,
Barack Obama scorched from birth had the outward brilliance but was chilled by
the Communist Russians.
Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Michelle
Obama, Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and
thousands of others attached their body and souls to Barack Obama and his aim
of Communism.
Barack Obama painted some vivid
picture of America under socialism as he planned to thoroughly change America
but the people have stopped him, so we thought.
Hillary Clinton wears her
colorful purple scarf as Barack Obama wears his drab blue jeans late at night
making sure government documents are spread throughout the government, to the
people that admire him so much, making sure thousands of documents are leaked
to the main stream media, the enemy of the people.
The celebrated black child,
Barack Obama, has scorched the U.S. Government and before God and Country is a
traitor to America.
His retribution against Donald
Trump, his protection gone Barack Obama can now be seen in the light of day as
the slick Negro double agent working against law and order. But, already today
we've discovered that Barack Obama by his own hand reduced the classification
levels of thousands of documents, thus making sure secret documents were spread
all across the government finding the roots of his socialist government to be
leaked, to harm the government of Donald Trump.
This hideous crime will not go
unpunished as the American people are standing and they know ABC, CBS, NBC,
MSNBC, CNN cannot be trusted.
Barack Obama is a man without a
country, his daughters will be renounced and his legacy will be dark.
1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a
request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor
communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request,
uncharacteristically, is denied.
2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the
Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie
Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference,
Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing emails, joking: “Russia,
if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are
missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the
media that Trump invited further hacking.
3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases
the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day
until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames
Trump and the Russians.
4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a
new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in
Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the
wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at
National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an
opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the
federal intelligence services.
5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases,
and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former
spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump
campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump.
None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several
media outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and that
it had been circulating in Washington.
6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh
later notes, and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama
administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share
globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other
intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” The new powers, and
reduced protections, could make it easier for intelligence on private citizens
to be circulated improperly or leaked.
7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports, on the
eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National
Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are monitoring several
associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties. Other news outlets
also report the exisentence of “a multiagency working group to coordinate
investigations across the government,” though it is unclear how they found out,
since the investigations would have been secret and involved classified
information.
8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge that the FBI
intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National Security Adviser
Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
The intercept supposedly was part of routine
spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI
transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed sanctions
on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally Yates, whom Trump
would later fire as acting Attorney General for insubordination, is involved in
the investigation. In the end, Flynn resigns over having misled Vice President
Mike Pence (perhaps inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.
9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The
New York Times cites “four current and former American officials” in reporting
that the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence
officials. The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits that there
is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the Russians. The
White House and some congressional Republicans begin to raise questions about
illegal intelligence leaks.
10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The
Washington Post reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice
with the Russian ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation
event and once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that
the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation hearings
that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context (not presented by
the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a campaign surrogate, and
that he was responding to claims in the “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New
York Times, in covering the story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to
preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump
campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread evidence
throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of intelligence
for government investigators” and perhaps the media as well.
In summary: the Obama administration sought, and eventually
obtained, authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign; continued
monitoring the Trump team even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found; then
relaxed the NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the
government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the
conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media.
“Just
a matter of days before the Trump administration took control, there was a
decision made inside the White House that certain special types of
intelligence, certain types of signals intelligence, certain types of
intelligence related to Russia could be promulgated, could be shared across the
whole intelligence community in ways that had never been possible before. The
reasoning for that is very, very hard to determine, unless there was some kind
of political motivation.”
“Why,
days before we come into office, after dozens and dozens of fake news reports
about potential connections to Russia, would we wish to downgrade this
information and make it more shareable across the intelligence community –
unless you’re hoping that somehow it will leak and be used for political
purposes?” he asked.
“If
you want to have an investigation on Russia, don’t look at AG Sessions; look at
the Obama administration’s decisions to do things like this,” he suggested,
“because it smacks of a very, very dangerous thing: the politicization of
intelligence.”
