Nother Negro Cherly Mills, Clinton Negro covers and mops up for White Privilege. BLM Black Lives Matter has discovered the Uncle Tom in the inner circles of Hillary Clinton and it's not Obama this time. It seems that Cheryl Mills, the one that always blocks investigations is mopping up Mother Clinton's mess off the floor as the Clinton Foundation has pooped all over the law and the Constitution. Cheryl Mills has been breaking the laws for years and she should be arrested today.. reviewing and handling u.s. top secrets without authorization.
Mommy Clinton told Cheryl Mills to clean up poo poo on Email Scandal
you know, like the other FBI investigations with James Comey FBI
If anyone would know Hillary consigliere Cheryl
Mills’ reputation for obstructing investigations, it’s FBI Director James
Comey. He complained about her lack of cooperation while probing Clinton
scandals in the 1990s. Yet he agreed to give Mills immunity from prosecution in
his probe of Hillary’s illegal e-mails as secretary of state, where Mills was
chief of staff.
As a Whitewater investigator for the Senate in the
mid-1990s, Comey sought information from Mills; but wouldn’t you know, the
then-deputy White House counsel claimed a burglar stole her notes.
Comey concluded that Hillary Clinton ordered Mills
to block investigators. The obstruction, the Senate committee found, included
the “destruction of documents” and other “highly improper . . . misconduct.”
Two years later, Mills was in the middle of another
Hillary scandal, involving the then-first lady’s integration of White House and
Democratic National Committee computer databases.
This time the House subpoenaed information from
Mills, who not only withheld the documents but, a government committee said,
“lied under oath” — prompting staff lawyers to send a criminal referral to the
Justice Department demanding prosecutors charge Mills with obstruction of
justice and perjury.
In 2000, a Commerce Department official testified
that Mills ordered her to “withhold” from investigators e-mails and other
documents exposing yet another scandal involving the first lady — the selling
of seats on foreign trade junkets for campaign cash.
Cheryl Mills given immunity deal in Clinton email
server probe
Cheryl Mills given immunity deal in Clinton email
server probe
At the same time, a federal judge suggested Mills
helped orchestrate a cover-up that blamed a technical “glitch” in the White
House archiving system that conveniently resulted in the loss of 1.8 million
e-mails under subpoena in the Monica Lewinsky, Filegate and other scandal
investigations.
Fast-forward to Hillary’s tenure as secretary. In
October 2012, Mills sorted through key Benghazi documents and decided which to
withhold from a review board. She also leaned on witnesses. Deputy ambassador
to Libya Gregory Hicks testified before Congress in 2013 that Mills told him in
an angry phone call to stop cooperating with investigators.
The FBI chief was fully aware of Mills’ M.O. when
he launched his investigation. Yet even after discovering she was in the middle
of everything improper, if not illegal, he treated her with kid gloves.
Comey knew it was Mills who had Hillary’s e-mails
moved off her private unsecured server and onto laptops, where she decided
which ones were government-related and OK for public release and which were
“personal.” He knew it was Mills who shredded the e-mails that were printed out
and who had the rest of the 31,000 e-mails deleted, and then had the laptops
bleached clean.
Modal Trigger
James ComeyPhoto: AP
And he knew it was Mills who told the Denver tech
who maintained the server to stop retaining her e-mails and to delete Hillary’s
archived e-mails, all of which the tech dutifully performed after Congress
subpoenaed them and ordered them preserved.
Even so, Comey agreed to grant Mills immunity in
exchange for her cooperation in the investigation. He also agreed to ground
rules that left some lines of inquiry off-limits. When agents in April tried to
pin her down on the procedures she used to search for Hillary’s e-mails under
order, she and her lawyer stormed out of the room. So much for Comey’s cooperative
witness.
Mills claimed such information was protected under
“attorney-client privilege,” which is ridiculous. Mills was chief of staff for
Hillary, not her lawyer, at the time Hillary was bypassing government security
and squirreling away state secrets in her basement.
How the FBI went easy on Hillary Clinton
How the FBI went easy on Hillary Clinton
And even though Mills deleted the records after she
left State and was supposedly acting as Hillary’s attorney then, privilege does
not apply when a client seeks advice on how to commit a crime and the crime is
committed.
Yet Comey’s agents abided by her claim and never
pursued the line of questioning again. In effect, they gave her a pass on the
whole question of the criminal obstruction behind which she looks to be the
mastermind. And then, three months later, they let her sit in on Hillary’s
interview even though Hillary was represented by attorney David Kendall!
Mills should be dragged before Congress to publicly
answer questions the FBI refused to ask her. But she would just lie with
impunity like she did in her past testimony involving other Hillary scandals.
Meet the mastermind behind Clinton's massive email
coverup
Meet the mastermind behind Clinton's massive email
coverup
Rather, it would be more productive to grill Comey
under the klieg lights. Why did he give a key suspect who orchestrated the
destruction of government records immunity as a witness? Why didn’t he demand
prosecutors convene a grand jury to question Mills under oath? Was he pressured
by the attorney general?
Sweating Mills could have cracked the case wide
open. No one would have ever let H.R. Haldeman get away with editing the Nixon
tapes. Why would the FBI director let Hillary’s chief of staff get away with
deleting her e-mails?
Paul Sperry
It’s clear now the FBI conducted a
sweetheart investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email shenanigans that appears
to have been fixed from the start to go nowhere.
Far from exonerating Clinton, the
nearly 60 pages of documents expose both the systematic destruction of
subpoenaed evidence by Clinton’s aides and the curious lack of interest by
investigators in recovering it.
Agents also failed to resolve
unanswered questions, reconcile contradictory testimony or sweat uncooperative
witnesses.
Comey declared the investigation free
of undue influence three days after his agents interviewed Clinton at FBI
headquarters under special terms.
What’s more, Comey made the two FBI
agents who interviewed Clinton — along with all agents and forensic analysts
involved in the so-called investigation — sign non-disclosure agreements
gagging them from talking about the case even with other employees.
Comey even let Clinton’s State
Department aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson sit in on the interview
with Clinton’s other lawyers, despite the glaring conflict of interest.
FBI
documents make clear Mills and Samuelson led the effort to search for and
destroy Clinton’s subpoenaed emails and should’ve been prime targets of the
investigation.
Comey didn’t even attend her
interview and, per his testimony, only read a “summary” of it.
The FBI failed to pursue even the
most basic lines of questioning. When Clinton pleaded ignorance about basic
classification symbols, agents could’ve produced the State documents she signed
acknowledging she was briefed about how to ID and handle classified information
at the highest levels.
When Clinton claimed she couldn’t
recall “ever contacting” the government computer specialist who set up her
unsecured home email server, Comey could’ve produced the same evidence the
State inspector general found showing Clinton had in fact paid the aide, Bryan
Pagliano, “by check or wire transfer in varying amounts between 2009 and 2013.”
Pagliano was a critical witness. But
instead of pressuring him to sing on Clinton and other higher-ups, Comey agreed
to give him immunity from criminal prosecution.
Nor did Comey squeeze the Platte
River Networks engineer who agents complained gave them “inconsistent
statements over the course of three interviews regarding from where on the
server he extracted Clinton’s emails.”
Comey also failed to push back
against Mills’ claims of “attorney-client privilege” when she refused to
divulge details about how she sifted through Clinton’s emails. Her name was on
many of the emails containing classified information. At the time, she was
Clinton’s chief of staff, not her lawyer. Agents agreed to drop the line of
questioning when she threatened to walk out of the interview.
Ron Sievert, a former assistant
director at the Justice Department and member of the DOJ’s National Security
Working Group, said Comey easily could’ve gone to court to challenge Mills’
privilege claim. He didn’t.
There was also prima facie evidence
of obstruction, yet Comey let that slide, too.
FBI investigators were denied two out
of five Clinton iPads, 13 of her mobile devices (some of which were smashed
with hammers) and even an Apple laptop and a thumb drive containing a 2013
archive of Clinton’s emails that aides claimed got “lost” in the mail. The FBI
accepted the story without even determining if the laptop was sent by UPS or
USPS.
It’s plain Comey never planned to
recommend charges. He didn’t even impanel a federal grand jury to hear the
evidence investigators had gathered.
What’s more, Comey and his
investigators came across emails that showed signs of a possible pay-for-play
scheme between Clinton Foundation donors and the State Department. Yet Comey
chose not to expand the email investigation into a probe of public corruption.
“There seems universal agreement
among those of us who know the law that no regular US government employee could
get away with this,” Sievert said.
Unless Congress forces more public
transparency on this Nixonian coverup — demanding the release of not just the
FBI case summaries in full, without redactions, but also the supporting
documents and transcripts of statements from key witnesses, along with the
computer forensics reports — Clinton could waltz into the White House with
Mills as her general counsel, where they’ll have the power of executive
privilege to cover up even worse scandals.
Paul Sperry
.
