Julia Hiatt-Steele - Willey's friend and neighbor - used the
machine to change her story.
Producers Michael Radutzky and Trevel Nelson courted Willey to
tell her story on 60 Minutes and a key selling point was the changing story of
Julie Steele, who was (they believed) being pressured by the White House into
changing her account in her affidavit in the Paula Jones case, which was
drafted with help from the president's lawyers. There was apparent pressure
concerning Steele's adoption of a boy in Romania, whether the procedure was
handled properly. Radutzky and Nelson had shown up at Steele's house, and when
they raised the adoption issue "she really freaked," says her lawyer,
Nancy Luque.
Newsday.com 9/6/00 AP "…..A federal judge on Wednesday
dismissed a lawsuit against a Newsweek reporter accused of disclosing a
source's name in stories about a woman who claimed that President Clinton made
an improper sexual advance against her. The source, Julie Hiatt Steele, alleged
that magazine reporter Michael Isikoff broke his promise not to print her name.
Steele's suit contended that Steele, at the behest of her friend Kathleen
Willey, lied to Newsweek in early 1997 by saying Willey had confided that she
had been the victim of an unwanted sexual advance by Clinton. Steele said she
later told Isikoff that she had lied and said her conversations with Newsweek
were "off the record" - meaning her comments and her name were not
meant for print. …… In 1998, Steele sued Isikoff, Newsweek, and The Washington
Post Co., which owns the magazine, citing breach of contract and emotional
distress, among other claims. ….."
8/7/98 Freeper report on CNN Julie Hiatt Steele "On Larry
King Live, Julie Hiatt Steele appeared to attack Kathleen Willey, Newsweek and
Michael Isikoff. During her appearance she disclosed the OIC is currently
persuing her for Contempt of Court for not disclosing details related to the
picture of Kathleen Willey she sold to the National Enquirer and also gave some
hint as to a possible reason why she (Steele) betrayed her friend to protect
Clinton. Ms. Steele also disclosed that the adoption of her child may not have
been legal. Apparently the adoption was "fixed" so she's not worried
about any problems (any more, at least).."
Capitol Hill Blue 6/9/99 "...When the White House saw that
she was corroborating Willey's story, officials began asking questions about
the legality of her adoption of a Romanian child.... VULNERABILITY: The
adoption...."
www.judicialwatch.org 7/29/99 98-1991 (WBB) Browning v Clinton
Motion "...Plaintiffs wish to question Ms. Steele on the reason(s) she
changed her story about Kathleen Willey's having confided to her the details of
Clinton's sexual assault, first stating and then denying that Willey told her
about the incident immediately after it happened. Additionally, Plaintiffs also
want to ask her whether former United States Trade Representative, Commerce
Secretary and longtime Clinton operative Mickey Kantor threatened her to change
her story by questioning the conditions surrounding the adoption of her child.
Finally, Plaintiffs want to inquire about her friend, Mary Earl Highsmith's,
recent testimony in federal court that Steele told her she was "afraid it
would be to her detriment" to take a position against Clinton. In her May
11, 1999 interview on Hardball with Chris Matthews, Kathleen Willey stated that
60 Minutes Producer Michael Radutzky told her that Mickey Kantor had threatened
her friend, Julie Hiatt Steele, to change her story. "[T]hey told me that
-- that my friend, Julie Steele, had been approached by a very high ranking
member of the Clinton [A]dministration questioning her about the -- the
conditions of her adoption of her child." Willey said that Radutzky told
her that Kantor pressured her friend, Julie Steele, to change Steele's
corroboration of Willey's encounter with Clinton: MATTHEWS: . . . But its your
belief that the [A]dministration used that child as - as a hostage, in effect,
to get her to turn around? WILLEY: That's what I was told. . ..MATTHEWS: By
whom? WILLEY: Well, by - I was told it was Mickey Kantor that went and
threatened her with that. MATTHEWS: Who told you that? WILLEY: Michael Radutzky
at "60 Minutes." The next day on Larry King Live, Willey explained
that it was this act of intimidation by the White House that motivated her to
do the 60 Minutes interview last year: WILLEY: That's what turned me. I didn't
go on "60 [M]inutes" to talk about the incident in the Oval Office. I
was so outraged that they had - supposedly, that the White House had sent one
of their minions to intimidate Julie with this adoption; I thought, well,
regardless of what she'd done to me, regardless of how she had said that I had
asked her to lie, I just thought that no mother should be threatened with her
child. . . .KING: "60 [M]inutes" misled you. They were going to do a
story about Julie Hiatt Steele and lying, and they did a story instead about
groping? WILLEY: Yes. KING: So why then do you believe them on Kantor? WILLEY:
Because I think that's they way the White House operates. I think they try to
intimidate people and scare them. They tried to scare me...."
Los Angeles Times 8/12/99 AP "...A former defendant in one
of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's prosecutions has lost a legal battle to
have the government pay her attorneys' fees. U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton
rejected the arguments of Julie Hiatt Steele that Starr's case was
"vexatious, frivolous and in bad faith." In an Aug. 3 ruling, Hilton
said the government won't have to pay costs and attorneys fees for Ms. Steele
because "the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable trier of fact to
find the defendant guilty." A federal jury on May 7 deadlocked 9 -3 in
favor of convicting Ms. Steele ..."
townhall.com 6/2/00 Brent Bozell "……..... Time, however,
has a way of unraveling yarns. In the last few weeks, the media's verdicts have
very silently collided with court rulings. For example, on May 19, Steele, who
joined a lawsuit alleging Ken Starr pressured her to offer false testimony, was
rebuffed by a federal judge. Associated Press reported that U.S. District Judge
John Nangle found "absolutely no evidence that (Starr) ever directly or
implicitly asked her to lie." In the entire national media, only The Washington
Post showed up on this story. …….. Steele first struck the media's fancy when
she betrayed her former friend, Kathleen Willey, by recanting her corroborating
testimony. Instead, she insisted Willey had urged her to lie to Newsweek about
Willey being groped by the president. Steele's media supporters, starting with
Geraldo Rivera, championed Steele's plight at the hands of "investigative
terrorist" Ken Starr. Steele's attacks on Starr were also carried on the
usually apolitical "Dateline NBC." On Nov. 27, 1998, Jane Pauley
theorized that "Julie Hiatt Steele is a woman whose 15 minutes of fame was
an unwanted consequence of doing a favor for a friend, and it could land her in
jail ... She believes Kenneth Starr wants to hear her say something and will do
almost anything to get her to say it." It would be foolish, however, to
expect these White House mouthpieces at NBC and CNBC to apologize and retract
their Starr-trashing "exposes" at this late date. Arriving at the
truth is not the point. The point is that Clinton made it through the crisis,
and the facts no longer matter. ......"
Susan Coleman - rumored (suicide 7.5 months pregnant)
Washington Weekly 11/30/98 Marvin Lee ".. Another case
involving Jack Palladino was that of Susan Coleman. While opposition
researchers supportive of President Bush were checking out an allegation that
she had an affair with her law professor Bill Clinton at the time of her
suicide, the Clinton opposition research team got wind of the investigation and
decided to strike a pre-emptive blow. Jack Palladino used CBS reporter Eric
Engberg to attack opposition researchers David Bossie, Jim Murphy and Floyd
Brown of harassing the Coleman family. Thus, in an attempt to pre-empt negative
publicity, it was the Clinton campaign itself that aired the Susan Coleman
allegations to the American people through CBS News.."
No comments:
Post a Comment