Who in the hell is Peter Kadzik? the Honest Hillary Clinton Illegal Email Server Investigation by the FBI would most likely take months..sorting through the nude pictures saved by Anthony Weiner..it could take years..shielding Muslim Brotherhood CAIR shill Huma Abedin could take decades.. Now check the time and date, read this; You're going to hear a lot about a well connected DOJ lawyer by the name of Kadzik that has been dispatched by DOJ corrupt Loretta Lynch to help out FBI James Comey.. no wonder Barack Obama is very calm.. it's all rigged... Huma Abedin also has a big shot White House lawyer.. the DOJ Kadzik helping, Hillary tossing around promises and maybe cash.. Anthony Weiner, could get life in prison.. really.
In my view, what has not been reported, and what I
think is very significant, is that we’ve all forgotten that Anthony Weiner is
under investigation for what amounts to child pornography, alleged child
pornography,” said Klein.
“Now, if he’s found guilty on multiple charges,
they can put him away for life because each charge brings 15, 20 years.
So if
you’re his attorney, you say to him, ‘Tony, what can you give the prosecutors
in exchange for bringing down the number of years you’re gonna have to serve?’
And it’s my view that what he offered them was the computer, and that in
exchange, he has gotten an agreement to reduce his charges,” he speculated.
“This computer apparently was unknown to the FBI,
and I think the reason that it took two, three, or even four weeks between the
time that they stumbled on this computer –
because Weiner made it available in
exchange for a deal – and the time that [James] Comey knew about it, the
director of the FBI, was because they were in the process of cutting this
arrangement,” Klein continued.
“Finally, it came to Comey’s attention, as we know,
and it became obvious to him and imperative to him that he do something about
it – because if he didn’t, can you imagine what would happen after the
election, and it became knowledge that he knew about this, did nothing about
it?
Clearly, the Congress would open a probe of the FBI and why it did nothing
about it. And Comey would be, not only on the hot seat, but perhaps even
impeachable. So I think that this is the untold story of behind-the-scenes
maneuvering on these emails,” he said.
Klein was convinced the allegations of Weiner
“sexting” with underage children were “the alpha and the omega of this whole
story” because “otherwise, this computer would never have come to light.”
Another factor Klein highlighted was the revolt
among FBI agents angry at political interference in their investigations of
Hillary Clinton.
“That’s not my opinion; this is my reporting,” he
said. “My reporting indicates from several sources that the atmosphere at the
FBI has never been, the morale has never been lower, that there is a stack,
literally a stack of resignations waiting on Comey’s desk for him to sign,
which he has yet to do, that people, when they meet him in the hallway, and he
says,
‘Good morning’ to them, many of them don’t even reply because they’re not
talking to him; that the sense within the FBI is that he disgraced the
institution back in July, when he knew quite well, obviously, that Mrs. Clinton
had violated not one, but several federal statutes in jeopardizing national
security, and raked her over the coals verbally – and then, for reasons that I
think had to do with his not wanting to interfere in the presidential race, let
her off legally.”
“Many of the people in the FBI thought that that
was disgraceful,” Klein asserted. “I think he’s been under huge pressure ever
since to redeem himself. I’m told his wife even – who is not only his most
personal, deepest relationship, but also a major adviser in his career – has
been telling him, ‘Jim, you’ve got to do something about this.’”
“This is a guy who goes to church every Sunday.
He’s an evangelical Catholic,” he said of Comey. “He gets on his knees every
night, prays to God, prays about his dead child that he lost, two or three days
after the child was born, believes deeply in his own moral rectitude and
constantly thinks that he is on the side of the angels. And I think he felt
that what he did this time around, which was to send this letter to the
Congress, was the highest right, moral thing to do. Whether it was or not, I
think that’s what motivated him.”
Marlow suggested Comey would not have reopened the
Clinton investigation “unless he knows he’s got the goods.”
“I agree with you. I think the disgrace is not
James Comey. I think the disgrace is the White House and the Justice Department
because as I report in my book Guilty as Sin, despite what Loretta Lynch said
about how independent she was or is, she and Valerie Jarrett were having secret
meetings last summer about the email investigation, keeping the President and
the White House up to date on everything that Jim Comey was doing,” Klein said.
“And Valerie Jarrett was under explicit orders – I
know people say, ‘Well, you never really tell the Attorney General exactly what
to do; you kind of wink.’ There was no wink. She was told in no uncertain
terms, according to my sources, that under no circumstances should Hillary
Clinton be indicted because Barack Obama wants desperately for Hillary Clinton
to succeed him in the White House, and not to have Donald Trump in the White
House because Donald Trump will completely undo everything that Obama thinks is
his legacy,” he added.
“So I think the disgrace is the Attorney General,
and the Attorney General trying to interfere with the FBI’s investigations –
both of the emails and the Clinton Foundation,” Klein reiterated.
Marlow mentioned a theory proposed by Breitbart
News Daily callers that Obama’s real endgame is to get Clinton over the finish
line in the 2016 election, then let her running mate, Tim Kaine, the “real
Obama guy,” take over if she’s removed from office.
“That’s not such a crazy theory,” said Klein. “It
may be a little far-fetched, but your callers are completely right: Tim Kaine
and the Clintons were never good friends because Tim Kaine backed Obama in 2008
against Hillary, and one of the deals for Obama to back Hillary this time was
for her to pick Tim Kaine, Obama’s boy, as her vice president.”
Breitbart News Daily
[W]e now know there were no fewer than four FBI investigations into the Clintons and their close associates – the Foundation, the emails, Abedin and Weiner and Terry McAuliffe, the governor of Virginia. And I suspect that was a very high-ranking Department of Justice political appointee who was carrying water for the Clinton machine and wanted to shut down an investigation into the Clinton Foundation, which increasingly looks like one of the largest money laundering and influence peddling operations in the world,” Cotton told host Hugh Hewitt.
Abedin, one of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, has abruptly stopped traveling with the candidate and gone dark while the campaign tries to dodge the latest news threatening to take down Clinton’s campaign.
During a campaign rally in Ohio on Monday, Clinton avoided using Abedin’s name while discussing the renewed FBI investigation.
Podesta and Clinton have Best Friends in really
high places, another cover up in the making by DOJ.
In other words, the best friend of John
Podesta, Clinton's Campaign char, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that
could potentially sink Hillary Clinton.
For those who missed it, this is what we reported
previously:
The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of
the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October, John Podesta, Hillary's
campaign chairman met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends,
including Peter Kadzik, who is currently a top official at the US Justice
Department serving as Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs.
The post-Benghazi dinner was attended by Podesta,
Kadzik, superlobbyist Vincent Roberti and other well-placed Beltway fixtures.
The first mention of personal contact between Podesta and Kadzik in the
Wikileaks dump is in an Oct. 23, 2015 email sent out by Vincent Roberti, a
lobbyist who is close to Podesta and his superlobbyist brother, Tony Podesta.
In it, Roberti refers to a dinner reservation at Posto, a Washington D.C.
restaurant. The dinner was set for 7:30
that evening, just one day after Clinton gave 11 hours of testimony to the
Benghazi Committee.
Podesta and Kadzik met several months later for
dinner at Podesta’s home, another email shows. Another email sent on May 5,
2015, Kadzik’s son asked Podesta for a job on the Clinton campaign.
Here are a few lingering legal headaches Clinton
could face:
1. Perjury: Why not start with a blast from the
Clinton past? Hillary Clinton signed documents testifying that she turned over
all work-related emails to the State Department, on orders from a federal
judge, under penalty of perjury. We already have indisputable proof she
violated this sworn statement… thousands of times.
The cloud of false statements under oath
surrounding Hillary Clinton is thousands of times thicker than the one around
Bill. Democrats seem to have found a hidden clause in the Constitution that says
Clintons can never be prosecuted for perjury, but Madame Secretary is really
stress-testing that particular privilege of Clintonhood. One would think the
federal judiciary had some interest in establishing that sworn documents must
be taken seriously.
2. Obstruction of Justice: Bill Clinton’s primary
motive for committing perjury was to obstruct justice—it was the second count
in his impeachment. (The justice he was obstructing was a sexual harassment
suit from Paula Jones, at a time when liberals insisted sexual harassment was
the most overlooked, under-prosecuted crime in the legal code.)
Hillary’s thousands of perjury counts are also
related to the obstruction of justice. She held back documents she didn’t want
Congress to see. She subverted the Freedom of Information Act, which is a law,
not a lovely suggestion.
Most media timelines of the Clinton email scandal
are either incomplete or deliberately obtuse, because they almost never
accurately relate how her secret server was discovered. For example, these
timelines from USA Today, CNN, and ABC News all get it wrong.
Sharyl Attkisson, who was a participant in the
story, has an accurate timeline that makes the important point Clinton-friendly
media outlets don’t want to talk about: we know about the secret server because
the State Department was sued for failing to respond to FOIA requests. The
State Department’s official story is that they were surprised to discover
Clinton was withholding thousands of documents on her private computer.
That’s straight-up obstruction of justice, in cases
involving multiple federal courts, as surely as Bill Clinton’s impeachable
offense of obstructing the Paula Jones suit. Clinton may become untouchable if
the American people allow her into the White House, but the lawsuits don’t
evaporate, and neither do the angry judges.
3. Bribery: After the FBI set off a headline
earthquake by re-opening the Clinton email investigation, we learned that
several other FBI investigations of Clintonworld have been quietly in progress
for some time. One of those investigations is digging into bribery allegations
against the Clinton Foundation. The FBI agents working on these cases were
reportedly very angry that top Bureau and Justice Department officials were
pressuring them to drop their investigations.
The most attention-grabbing of these suspicions
concerns an FBI official, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife received an
inexplicably huge political donation from Clinton bagman Terry McAuliffe,
currently the governor of Virginia. The timing of this donation was so
convenient that even the Left side of the blogosphere has produced some uneasy
speculation that McCabe probably should have recused himself from all things
Clinton-related.
Well, he didn’t recuse himself, and the conflicts
of interest are so apparent that the lack of a chiseled-in-stone quid pro quo
might not be enough to kill this case off. After all, corrupt officials aren’t
usually dumb enough to write down their quid pro quo agreements, or repeat them
into microphones. The McCabe controversy already has longer legs than most
observers expected, when the news first broke.
4. Pay for Play: There has also been recent
confirmation that the FBI has investigated influence-peddling allegations
against the Clinton Foundation, which was so obviously used for that purpose
that it’s funny to watch Clinton apologists insist nothing can be proven in a
court of law. Some of the most vigorous infighting within the Bureau reportedly
concerns whether pay-for-play investigations should move forward.
WikiLeaks has exposed emails from Clinton insiders
that openly discuss how the Foundation was part of a network that steered
millions of dollars to “Bill Clinton Inc.” Even longtime members of the Clinton
syndicate professed themselves troubled by these operations. They were also
unhappy with arrangements like Hillary Clinton’s agreement to speak in Morocco
after a $12 million donation to the Clinton Global Initiative.
It’s entirely possible that more documentation
about these suspicious Clinton Foundation dealings will come to light after the
election, especially if some of the people Clinton took money from grow upset
with her. It’s downright dangerous to have a President with so many strings
attached.
5. Illegal Use of a Nonprofit Organization: There
are many laws governing the management of charitable organizations, generally
intended to prevent them from becoming money-laundering operations, ripoff
operations, and vehicles for political influence peddling. The Clinton
Foundation and its galaxy of related operations may eventually find itself
answering some questions about compliance with those laws, assuming the IRS
decides to stop focusing its efforts on hassling mom-and-pop pro-life groups
and kitchen-table Tea Party outfits. If the Foundation is ever held to account
for any other impropriety, charges of abusing a nonprofit should be part of the
legal package as well.
6. Racketeering: Former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy
has recently observed that Hillary Clinton’s abuse of the State Department
looks an awful lot like a “racketeering enterprise,” which could trigger the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1971, more widely known
as RICO. McCarthy explained:
Under RICO, an “enterprise” can be any association
of people, informal or formal, illegitimate or legitimate – it could be a Mafia
family, an ostensibly charitable foundation, or a department of government. It
is a racketeering enterprise if its affairs are conducted through “a pattern of
racketeering activity.” A “pattern” means merely two or more violations of
federal or state law; these violations constitute “racketeering activity” if
they are included among the extensive list of felonies laid out in the statute.
7. Fraud: Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel has
been building a case that the “Clinton Charity Network,” as he calls the
complete system of Clinton operations, has committed “charity fraud of epic
proportions.” In part, he refers to discrepancies between donor accounts and
the Clinton Foundation’s books.
Others have pointed out how the Clinton Health
Access Initiative has essentially ignored New York state law for years, without
a peep from Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (who just happens to be part of
the Clinton campaign’s “leadership council.”) There are some interesting
differences between the paperwork CHAI submitted to the IRS and what it
submitted to the state of New York, which has more specific requirements about
identifying foreign donors.
In addition to getting a free pass on perjury, the
Clintons are traditionally allowed to violate tax laws without penalty,
eventually refiling paperwork when “errors” are discovered years after the
fact. Another round of whoops-my-bad, no-harm-no-foul “refiling” during a
Hillary Clinton presidency would be embarrassing, especially if she’s busy
trying to ratchet up taxes on everyone else.
No comments:
Post a Comment