The Walt Disney Company. How much malfeasance took place during the 12 years starting in 1993 that Disney owned Miramax, the Weinsteins’ first company? Clearly, some of the testimony coming out from various actresses, like Gwyneth Paltrow and Ashley Judd, can be connected to specific movies, so it is probable he was preying on many women during that time frame. Disney claims that Miramax had a lot of autonomy, but if any victims retained a lawyer to pursue a settlement, as Rose McGowan may have done (she did Scream with them in ’96 and is reported to have received a settlement), they likely would have threatened to file suit against not only Weinstein personally but also the company, including the parent company. That’s how these things work. Therefore, I can’t imagine that someone at Disney, if not Michael Eisner the CEO at the time, had not been informed. Even if Eisner was not in-the-loop, as he maintains, I would bet that some executive(s) were and there are files in a warehouse or on a server that would be illuminative.
…
It's clear that Sen. Kamala
Harris (D-CA), a first-term Senator who is among the leading prospects for the Obama
Clinton DNC Democratic presidential nomination in 2020 is not a philosopher,
nor a brilliant political stateswoman so what is Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), at
a glance? We can already tell that Sen.
Kamala Harris (D-CA) is not a public servant, most likely has shared in
political corruption, graft and some illicit undiscovered sexual affairs and
benefits from the all around bad behavior of the DNC Democratic Socialist Party
which is used to siphon taxpayer dollars to special interest groups, mainly
colored people and illegal aliens. The
DNC mass conspiracy against the American people became known as Sanders was
buried and Hillary Clinton became the only presidential candidate that the
American people were offered which became the political controversy of the last
national elections.
Unbeknownst to Kamala Harris
(D-CA) she has already been buried by the DNC elite as the hush up Kamala
Harris (D-CA) money has already been distributed. America is not yet ready for another colored
in the white house as the last affair about destroyed the entire nation.
DNC GOP DOJ FBI investigators are
already working on Kamala Harris (D-CA) which of course would be off the books
like the FBI DOJ and Obama Clinton DNC did to president Donald Trump. She is already implicated in several
schemes, maybe some financial scandals and speculations. Once confronted we would expect Kamala Harris
(D-CA) to come clean about the rumored affair, the love letters and other
activities. So much dirty laundry there
is a pamphlet giving the outline of the opposition research on Kamala Harris
(D-CA) with the amorous connected dots not proven yet. Sexual Infidelity would stain Kamala Harris (D-CA) but not ruin her as she is a Obama Clinton
Democratic Socialist, but the corruption claims are different.
Kamala Harris (D-CA) has some
dubious distinctions and will be expelled from the upper ranks of the DNC party
machine other than to be used. She plans
to seize the colored vote but at least so far she hasn't claimed to be a
Cherokee Indian or something stupid. Her
audacious plan is simple, convince enough stupid people that's she's smart and
then gain traditional power over them, keeping them in the chains of welfare,
low paying jobs and be renters for life.
Kamala Harris (D-CA) is clearly a
female scoundrel, following the corrupt step of Hillary Clinton.
NBC News. Ironically, the network that brought us To Catch a Predator let this predator go. NBC News President Noah Oppenheim has stated that they did not move forward with this story when Farrow was working on it for them because he didn’t have “the elements [they] needed to air it” and that Farrow “greatly expanded the scope of his reporting” after taking the story to The New Yorker. I was in touch with Ronan throughout the period he was working on this epic project and can say that Oppenheim’s statement does not comport with what I know. The last time that I spoke to Ronan while he was still working on this for NBC was around mid-August. At that time, he had an overwhelming amount of evidence backing his report, including many recorded interviews with women both fully on camera and also recorded in shadow. If the fact that some women Farrow interviewed didn’t want their identity revealed invalidated this story for NBC, then it also would have done so to every investigation of the mafia or South American drug cartels that I’ve ever seen. From what I can tell, Ronan had more hard evidence in August than The New York Timeshad for the article they published on Oct. 6.
…
The New York Times. I cringe to add The Paper of Record to this rogues gallery, as it was they who first named Harvey Weinstein a sexual predator when others did not have the integrity and backbone to do so. But there is an allegation by TheWrap’s Sharon Waxman that the Times killed a story about Weinstein’s depravity back in 2004, ostensibly due to pressure not only from His Horribleness but also from major movie stars. The Times has said that editors who worked with Waxman on this did not remember it the same way as she and that Waxman did not offer the necessary corroboration for them to run her version of the article. I will say that she’s had eight years to publish her account on TheWrap but chose not to, which I can only believe was due to Waxman’s wanting advertising from The Weinstein Company or that she feared being sued without The Times at her back. Still, the consequences of Waxman’s report not running 13 years ago are all too clear, given what we now know. The truth surrounding this allegation must be made known in detail.
No comments:
Post a Comment