“Hillary Clinton was married to Bill Clinton barely three years before he raped Juanita,”

“Hillary Clinton was married to Bill Clinton barely three years before he raped Juanita,” 

.

A Free Shipping Offer - Nobody Wants the Aged Sicked Crooked Hillary Clinton even if they offer free shipping, Hillary Clinton is shrinking but her lies are growing

Hillary Clinton is shrinking.  The aged and sick Golden Girl of the Democratic Socialist Party provided  the voter with no summer sunshine as she shrinks smaller and smaller.  Nice Women turn away from Hillary Clinton, poll numbers show that working women are turning and running away from Hillary Clinton... too much smoke... too much confusion and Clinton scandals.. Yell NO to Hillary Clinton

The real mystery of Hillary Rodham Clinton will never be told as the puzzling real life history of the Clinton's would surely jail them both.

Hillary Clinton hoped to harvest the Oval Office as President of the United States but the November election will take up her many scandals and the voters, black, white and brown are threatening more headaches for Hillary Clinton and maybe a prison terms.

Hillary Clinton Email Scandal, Russian Uranium Scandal, Benghazi Scandal, Fast and Furious Scandal, Bill Clinton's Sexual Assault Scandals,  and the Clinton Foundation Scandal are surely the mysteries of the decade and everybody is interested how the insiders "The Clinton's" can continue to lie in their inconsistent way and remain free of criminal charges.

Hillary Clinton is a disappointment, and even with free shipping the voters won't buy her promises and bring her home.

The Hillary Clinton Renegades FBI Files DOJ, The Hillary Clinton sham, crime, and profit from her pyramid scheme - The criminal case against Mrs. Clinton - How Monica Lewinsky Sex Scandal Saved Hillary Rodham Clinton from going to Prison -

Hillary Clinton used sex as a weapon against Vince Foster and Webb Hubbell but she was forced to put them on Bill Clinton's government payroll to keep them quite. Hillary Rodham Clinton is clearly a stone cold criminal with a law degree and political influence to keep her out of prison.

Today, the new, unredacted version of the memo—fills in important blanks in the criminal case against Mrs. Clinton.

The entire text of the memo can now be pieced together from the redacted version released by the National Archives and the new, unredacted version, reported here for the first time.

The broad contours of the Whitewater case against Mrs. Clinton are well known. 

With Governor Bill Clinton running Arkansas, 

Mrs. Clinton leveraged her work at the Rose Law Firm into a series of transactions on behalf of a corrupt financial institution, Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan, run by a longtime Clinton crony, James McDougal. 

Among the transactions was a document drafted by Mrs. Clinton to conceal a series of fraudulent loans that were used to deceive federal bank examiners.

The fraudulent loans were part of a land deal known as Castle Grande. 

Mrs. Clinton, along with her Rose Law Firm partner Webster Hubbell—later given a high-ranking post at the Justice Department by President Clinton—handled the Madison Guaranty accounts for law firm. 

Hubbell’s father-in-law, Seth Ward, also played a key role in the Madison accounts.

In the mid-1980s, federal bank regulators started taking a close look at Madison Guaranty and concluded that Castle Grande was a sham, a crime, and part of a pyramid scheme to enrich insiders and hide the S&L’s disintegrating finances. According to the newly obtained document, “Hillary Clinton and Hubbell concealed their involvement in Castle Grande.”

OIC prosecutors turned over every rock in Clintons’ financial world and drafted several possible indictments of Clinton and Hubbell. 

Last year, Judicial Watch disclosed that the National Archives holds versions of the draft indictments, but has refused to produce them in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, citing concerns for Mrs. Clinton’s privacy. 

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton denounced the move as “a political decision to protect [Clinton’s] candidacy” and vowed to press on in court.

The new, unredacted version of the OIC memo spells out the criminal case against Mrs. Clinton:

Here is how we would characterize this case in the legal terms of an indictment: “The object of the conspiracy was to conceal, by unlawful means, the true facts relating to HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON’s and WEBSTER LEE HUBBELL’s relationship with Seth Ward, Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan and Madison Financial Corporation. 

By concealing these facts HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and WEBSTER LEE HUBBELL would avoid and evade potential criminal and civil liability, fraudulently secure additional income for the Rose Law Firm and safeguard the political campaigns of William Jefferson Clinton.” 

What this means in practice is that Hillary Clinton and Hubbell may have been involved in a crime in 1986. When they realized their potential criminal, civil and political exposure, they concealed their activities, repeatedly and with great effect. The case would be the story of how that happened.

The crime? Castle Grande “cross loans,” and an “option agreement” drafted by Mrs. Clinton, were used to deceive federal bank examiners.

The Clinton campaign did not reply to requests for a response to the charges. Mr. Hubbell declined to comment.

The newly revealed document fills in some of the blanks relating to prosecution theories of criminal conduct by Mrs. Clinton, Hubbell, and a third Rose Firm partner, Vincent Foster. The document notes that the partners were “concealing conduct bearing on possible civil and criminal liability.”

As Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign gained speed, media pressure on Mrs. Clinton increased. Reporters started asking questions about Madison Guaranty. The S&L had imploded in the 1980s and was the subject of several civil and criminal cases. The Rose Law Firm partners—Clinton, Hubbell and Foster—were well aware of the campaign’s vulnerability on the Madison issue.

“Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton were business partners of the owner of a failed S&L,” notes the National Archives version of the OIC memo. 

“[I]t was alleged McDougal had hired Hillary Clinton to represent him before state agencies that reported to her husband as a way of indirectly wielding influence over the decisions being made….

the campaign and Hillary Clinton personally provided the public with inaccurate information regarding: how [Madison] came to retain the [Rose Law Firm] and the extent and nature of Hillary Clinton’s work before state agencies—inaccurate stories that Hillary Clinton and Hubbell were ‘stuck with’ as official investigations began.”

Federal investigations—prompted by news reports and the Clintons’ often evasive, incomplete responses to questions—soon began. 

The Resolution Trust Corp., the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Congress, and the OIC all questioned Mrs. Clinton under oath.

Many records were missing. 

Following the campaign, notes the National Archives version of the memo, “Hubbell and Vince Foster removed all remaining [Rose] records relating to the [firm’s] and Hillary Clinton’s work for [Madison] from the law firm. 

In various parcels those records were sent to Washington, D.C.”

Undisclosed until today is a censored line from that version of the memo: Rose attorneys, it says, “liken the removal of these firm records to theft.”

The National Archives version of the memo notes: “Two copies of the most significant of these records, Hillary Clinton’s billing records for the work she did for [Madison] are known to exist—one set was discovered in a brief case in Vince Foster’s attic in July 1997;

 the other set was discovered in the [White House] Book Room adjacent to Hillary Clinton’s office in August 1995 and publicly released in January 1996.”

The 1996 news of the discovery of a set of billing records in the White House set off a furor. The documents had been under subpoena for two years. Mrs. Clinton was summoned to a grand jury to explain.

Why were the billing records so important? 

Mrs. Clinton by that time had made numerous sworn statements to federal investigators and Congress. If the statements were false, that was a crime. The billing records might prove whether Mrs. Clinton was telling the truth or lying.

And if Mrs. Clinton was hiding documents under subpoena—a charge she denied, saying she had no knowledge of how the billing records got to the White House—then she might be guilty of obstruction of justice.

The OIC believed that Mrs. Clinton knew precisely where the records were and had reviewed them during the presidential campaign. According to the National Archives version of the memo: “The evidence supports the conclusion that Hillary Clinton reviewed the billing records in detail in February-March 1992, and that she retained a copy of the records for reference and use during 1992-1995.”

Undisclosed until today—that is, censored from the National Archives version of the memo—is the prosecutors’ conclusion about what this would mean to a jury: “a reasonable jury is likely to conclude that her statements to investigators during 1994-1996 were inaccurate and misleading [and] were made with the knowledge of their falsity. Hillary Clinton, Hubbell and Vince Foster’s concealment and destruction of the relevant records is substantial corroborative evidence of their consciousness of guilt.”

The National Archives version of the memo continues: “What, then, are the crimes under consideration? Between January 1994 and February 1996 both Hillary Clinton and Hubbell made numerous sworn statements to the RTC, the FDIC, the Senate and the House of Representatives, and to OIC. 

Each of these reflected and embodied materially inaccurate stories relating to: how [the Rose Law Firm] came to be retained by [Madison Guaranty]; Hillary Clinton’s role in the [Castle Grande] venture; Hillary Clinton’s role in representing [Madison] before state agencies; Hubbell’s representations to the RTC and FDIC regarding Hillary Clinton’s role in the [Castle Grande] venture; and the removal of records from [the Rose firm]. The question, generally, is not whether the statements are inaccurate, but whether they are willfully so.”

Sound familiar? As in Whitewater, Mrs. Clinton now faces questions about missing records—the thousands of emails supposedly deleted forever from her computer.

As in Whitewater, a series of shifting explanations seem to dig her deeper into a hole.

As in Whitewater, she works behind a phalanx of lawyers well-schooled in Clinton damage control—indeed some of the very same lawyers who steered her through the OIC investigation.

In the end, Mrs. Clinton defeated the OIC. Prosecutors decided not to seek an indictment from a grand jury, concluding that they could not win the largely circumstantial case against such a popular, high-profile defendant.

Also looming large in the OIC’s thinking: Monica Lewinsky. 

The Lewinsky investigation was hurtling along a separate track. 

Prosecutors were convinced they had overwhelming evidence that President Clinton had committed perjury and obstruction of justice in the Lewinsky case.

The case against Mrs. Clinton was abandoned and the full focus of the OIC turned to Lewinsky.

As one prosecutor later remarked, “Monica saved Hillary.”

Note: this article originally appeared on Breitbart.com 

A 4/10/98 OIC memo uses terms ‘crime(s),’ ‘criminal,’ ‘fraudulent,’ ‘misrepresented,’ ‘inaccurate,’ ‘deceive,’ ‘mislead,’ ‘misstatement,’ and ‘concealed’ 27 times in 20 pages to describe actions by Clinton and Whitewater associates

(Washington, DC) January 28, 2016 – J

udicial Watch today released 246 pages of previously undisclosed Office of Independent Counsel (OIC) internal memos revealing extensive details about the investigation of Hillary Rodham Clinton for possible criminal charges involving her activities in the Whitewater/Castle Grande fraudulent land transaction scandal.  The memos are “statements of the case” against Hillary Clinton and Webster Lee “Webb” Hubbell, Hillary Clinton’s former law partner and former Associate Attorney General in the Clinton Justice Department.  Ultimately, the memos show that prosecutors declined to prosecute Clinton because of the difficulty of persuading a jury to convict a public figure as widely known as Clinton. (Links to the full set of documents are below.)

Although some details of the documents have been previously reported, Judicial Watch is today publicly releasing the independent counsel prosecution memos for the first time.  The prosecution memos—portions of which were heavily redacted—were obtained by Judicial Watch from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

An April 10, 1998, memo summarizes “the crimes under consideration”

What, then are the crimes under consideration? Between January 1994 and February 1996 both Hillary Clinton and [Webster] Hubbell made numerous sworn statements to the RTC, the FDIC, the Senate and the House of Representatives, and to the OIC. Each of these reflected and embodied materially inaccurate stories relating to: how RLF [Clinton and Hubbell’s Rose Law Firm] came to be retained by MGSL [the Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan]; Hillary Clinton’s role in the IDC/Castle Grande venture; Hillary Clinton’s role in representing MGSL; Hillary Clinton’s role in representing MGSL before state agencies’; Hubbell’s representations to the RTC [Resolution Trust Corporation] and FDIC regarding Hillary Clinton’s role in the IDC/Castle Grande venture; and the removal of records from the RLF. The question, generally, is not whether the statements are inaccurate, but whether they are willfully so.

The records released today by Judicial Watch were prepared for an “All OIC Attorneys” meeting on April 27, 1998, at which a final decision about whether to indict Clinton and Hubbell was the subject of a lengthy debate.  The records explore in detail the role Clinton played in the fraudulent Castle Grande transaction, the role of Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan, and the subsequent lengthy cover-up as the Clintons sought and won the White House.

Clinton, according to prosecutors, drafted an option agreement that concealed from federal bank examiners a fraudulent $300,000 cross-loan in the Castle Grande transaction.  Her concealment of her role in this fraudulent transaction, including the hiding of her Rose Law Firm billing records concerning her legal work for Madison, were the subject of an OIC obstruction of justice probe.

The 1998 memoranda include substantial evidence depicting Clinton and her former Rose Law Firm partners—Hubbell, and Vincent Foster, both of whom went on to senior positions in the Bill Clinton presidency—as  complicit in activities that “facilitated crimes.”

Page 18 of the OIC documents notes that Clinton “destroyed” her personal records of her work for Madison Guaranty. Page 39 of the documents notes:

Section II contains a chronological background and contextual summary of the investigation so that the facts relating to possible obstruction can be placed in the context of the ongoing investigation by OIC.

The evidence in the new documents covers:

• Castle Grande. “The Castle Grande transactions were crimes.” The statement is followed by an explicit six-paragraph dissection of the land-flipping scheme.

• Madison Guaranty S&L. Clinton minimized the role she played in seeking state regulatory assistance for the corrupt savings and loan, headed by key Clinton financial and political supporter James McDougal. At the time, Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas.

• Vincent Foster and the Missing Rose Law Firm Billing Records. The Rose records were a key piece of evidence in the probe. They were missing for years. After Foster’s July 1993 suicide, the OIC documents note, where the billing records went “is an open question….  Several pieces of evidence support the inference that personal documents which Hillary Clinton did not want disclosed were located in Foster’s office at the time of his death and then removed.”

• Removal of Records from Vincent Foster’s Office. “ [O]n the afternoon of July 21st Bernard Nussbaum, then White House Counsel, initially agreed to allow two career DOJ employees to review the documents in Foster’s office for evidence that might shed light on the cause of his death.  That evening and the next morning Nussbaum, Hillary Clinton, Susan Thomases, and Maggie Williams (Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff) exchanged 10 separate phones calls … That morning, according to the DOJ employees, Nussbaum changed his mind and refused to allow the DOJ prosecutors to review the documents; instead, he reviewed them himself and segregated several as ‘personal’ to the Clintons.”

• Hiding the Billing Records.  “On the evening of July 22nd, Thomas Castleton … assisted Williams [Maggie Williams, Hillary Clinton chief of staff] in carrying a box of personal documents up to … a closet in Hillary Clinton’s office. The closet is approximately 30 feet from the table in the Book Room, where the billing records were found 2 years later…. There is a circumstantial case that the records were left on the table by Hillary Clinton. She is the only individual in the White House who had a significant interest in them and she is one of only 3 people known to have had them in her possession since their creation in February 1992.”

• Buying the Silence of a Co-Conspirator? Hubbell, criticized by the OIC for his lack of cooperation with the probe, received several “jobs” from Clinton supporters for which he apparently did little or no work. During a taped conversation in prison, Hubbell appears to acknowledge that he withheld information from the OIC. Several of Hubbell’s job-providers fell most strongly within the hush money allegation. The OIC notes eight of them on page 197.

• The Missing Draft Indictment. More than 60 pages of the OIC memoranda are completely censored, withheld by the National Archives. Multiple sources tell Judicial Watch that these pages include a full draft indictment of Clinton and Hubbell, as well as a detailed “order of Evidence” list.

The National Archives is withholding additional documents Judicial Watch believes to be critical to understanding Clinton’s full role in the Whitewater scandal.

On March 9, 2015, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request seeking all draft indictments of Clinton in the files of Hickman Ewing Jr., who served as deputy independent counsel in the Whitewater probe.  In 1999, Ewing testified that he wrote a draft indictment of Clinton.

On March 19, 2015, the National Archives admitted locating records responsive to the Ewing material request, confirming that it found 38 pages of responsive records in a folder entitled “Draft Indictment,” and approximately 200 pages of responsive records in a folder entitled “Hilary Rodham Clinton/Webster L. Hubbell Draft Indictment.”  Judicial Watch is suing in federal court to force the release of the draft indictment, which is being withheld by the National Archives to protect the privacy of Hillary Clinton.

Ultimately, as an April 24, 1998, memo suggests, prosecutors were persuaded that a jury would not convict Clinton based upon circumstantial evidence.  OIC attorney Paul Rosenzweig wrote:

In a high profile case of this sort, however, I think that some jurors are likely to put OIC to the full measure of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and, in effect, insist that circumstantial evidence is an inferior form of evidence on which they cannot convict.  Such a distinction would be “lawless” in a formal sense, as contrary to their jury instructions – but we blink reality if we do not expect this reaction to a primarily circumstantial high profile case.

The prosecutor concluded:

Bottom line: We can anticipate the following: 2% = Rule 29; 18% = Acquittal; 70% =Hung Jury; 10% = Conviction. Not enough in my view.

“These new Hillary Clinton prosecution memos are damning and dramatic,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Hillary Clinton’s bank fraud, obstruction, lies, and other fraud began in Arkansas, continued in the White House and actually accelerated because the suicide of her friend Vincent Foster.  The memos suggest that if she weren’t First Lady, she would have been successfully prosecuted in federal court. As we continue the court fight to get the actual draft indictment of Hillary Clinton we first uncovered in this investigation, Americans would do well to read these memos. If you want to understand the deplorable ethics and corruption at the Clinton State Department, these documents provide important background.”

Can the Sex Crazed HORNDOG Bill Clinton save Wacky Hillary Clinton - The revealed Secret Pact of Ambition of Hillary and Bill Clinton - Direct Quotes Concerning Hillary Rodham Clinton - Progressive Democratic Socialist - One World Order - DNC - GOP - Barack Obama Hillary Clinton Donald Trump - The Tramps House - One World Order - Socialism - ObamaCare - Gun Control - Freedom of Speech - Presidential Election 2016 -

Direct Quotes concerning 

Hillary Rodham Clinton 

and her rotten husband Bill Clinton
She and Bill hatched a 20-year “secret pact of ambition”

Can the HORNDOG save Hillary Clinton

Tea Party - Boiling Mad Against Hillary Clinton Barack Obama and the Administrative State

Pointing to a “vast right-wing conspiracy it seems everything said about Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton can be proven by direct quotes.  Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Bill Cosby, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Van Jones, Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice, David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel, George Soros and hundreds more have a lot in common to Hillary and Bill Clinton, they will all vote for her, wonder why?

Bill Lost the Nuclear Launch Codes at peak of Monica Lewinsky crisis 

“These women are all trash. 

Nobody’s going to believe them.” - Hillary

“Hillary has eaten more pussy than I have.” - Bill

 “You get two for the price of one,” 

 “I’m going to tell you a secret. Hillary Clinton has had a lesbian affair. At last we have a First Lady in the White House that we can fuck!”

WASHINGTON – Two new biographies depict Hillary Rodham Clinton in full damage control as she scrambled to keep a lid on Bubba’s bimbo messes – vowing to destroy Gennifer Flowers and sitting in on the legal deposition of another mistress.

The tantalizing details of the former first lady’s frantic actions during Bill Clinton’s rise to power come in the much-ballyhooed “A Woman in Charge” by Carl Bernstein and “Her Way” by Don Van Natta Jr. and Jeff Gerth, details of which were revealed in yesterday’s Washington Post.

“Her Way” says that during Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign, a team overseen by Hillary hired a private investigator to dig up dirt on Flowers, Bill’s former flame, “until she is destroyed.”

And according to Bernstein, Hillary Clinton put her legal training to good use by sitting in on the deposition of another of Bill’s alleged mistresses. An ambitious Hillary Clinton was apparently more interested in limiting political damage caused by her husband’s philandering than about any personal pain, quipping to Bill’s Arkansas chief of staff, “There are worse things than infidelity.”

Bernstein reports that Bill Clinton was so smitten by Arkansas power company executive Mary Jo Jenkins that he wanted to divorce Hillary in 1989 – but Hillary, who’s now the 2008 Democratic White House front-runner, refused, and now is running again 2016.

A rattled Hillary hinted to best pal Diane Blair the prospect of divorce, but hedged because “she was concerned that if she were to become a single parent, how would she make it work in a way that would be good for Chelsea,” Blair told Bernstein before her death in 2000.

The books, while treading along the much-trampled path of the Clintons’ past, offer a fresh look into their complicated life together.

* “Her Way” reports Hillary did not read the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq before voting to authorize the war – a vote that haunts her on the Democratic primary trail.

* “A Woman in Charge” says Hillary was so terrified of being indicted during Kenneth Starr’s Whitewater probe that she was willing to tiptoe along the line of truth, telling an aide, “I have a reason for not being forthcoming.”

* She and Bill hatched a 20-year “secret pact of ambition” that culminates with both winning the White House – though one source for the “Her Way” tale slammed the assertion as “preposterous.”

“The news here is that it took three reporters nearly a decade to find no news,” Clinton campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson told The Post.

            “My sources indicate that Hillary Clinton is bisexual and fools around more than her husband. The stories you hear from the Secret Service, detailed to guard her, are mind boggling … It is Hillary that is pushing the White House’s homosexual agenda.”

Hillary Clinton tried to soften her image  by introducing herself “as a mother, a wife, a daughter, a sister, a woman.” and now she's playing the grandmother role.

Fifteen years later, Michelle Obama, another blunt Ivy League-educated lawyer, recast her own image by introducing herself at the Democratic convention in Denver in almost exactly the same words.

A prominent Washington, D.C. veterinarian who was visiting the White House to treat Socks the cat and “had opened the wrong door and discovered Hillary locked in a passionate embrace with another woman.” 

One evening in the winter of 1998, Bill and Hillary Clinton invited a small group of friends to watch a movie in the White House screening-room.

It was the first time they had surfaced socially after weeks of headlines about a 24-year-old intern called Monica Lewinsky.

Five days after the story had broken on January 21, Bill Clinton had stood before the TV cameras, wagged his finger, and emphatically denied having sexual relations with "that woman, Miss Lewinsky."

The next day, Hillary had blamed the accusations on a "vast Right-wing conspiracy" against her and her husband.

Since then, both Clintons had maintained silence on the even as lurid and specific details of Bill's affair with Lewinsky continued to emerge.

The Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service, was taping Bill’s phone sex with Monica Lewinsky. 

Now, though, they were settled in their large armchairs, ready for a welcome respite. And the film - a comedy called Something To Talk About, starring Julia Roberts and Dennis Quaid - began promisingly enough, with scenes of domestic bliss involving a successful couple called Grace and Eddie and their adorable preteen daughter, Caroline.

Then, suddenly, the plot took an ominous turn. Grace and Caroline spot Eddie outside his office building, kissing a beautiful blonde. Observing her mother's fury, Caroline asks: "Is Daddy in trouble?" "Big trouble," says Grace.

Not everyone in the film is sympathetic to the wronged wife. "You marry a guy whose nickname in college was Hound Dog - what did you think was going to happen?" says her sister.

But Grace has her revenge - in the form of a dinner of salmon with a sauce laced with emetics, a recipe helpfully suggested by an aunt.

"It's not lethal," explains the aunt. "It will, however, make him sick as the dog that he is."

The errant husband duly falls violently ill, retching and screaming in agony.

When the lights came up in the White House Family Theatre, Bill and Hillary were completely silent, recalled Mary Mel French, a friend whose own marriage had ended in a bruising divorce a few years earlier.

"We all wanted to slide under our chairs. Nobody said anything as we all got up to leave. I happened to be next to Hillary when we were walking out.

"She whispered to me: 'I'll tell you what. We should have that concoction. You should mix it up first and give me a portion.'

"We burst out laughing and couldn't stop."

           In 2010 Bill Clinton conducted the ceremony at the wedding of Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin, who is a top aide to Hillary Clinton. 

Hillary Clinton's ability to laugh at such a moment of peril for her marriage - and her husband's presidency - not only signaled an awareness of her husband's philandering but showed "she was trying to make the best of a lot of things," recalled French.

It was a tantelising glimpse into a relationship that has fascinated and mystified the world. Their marriage has been dogged by Bill's tomcat tendencies since before they exchanged vows in 1975.

In Arkansas, where he was governor, his extramarital activities nearly broke the marriage twice.

Hamilton Jordan, then a prominent Democratic party worker, recalled that when Bill lost his first re-election for governor in 1980 he sought consolation by "recklessly chasing women."

In 1981, when their daughter Chelsea was a year old, a friend overheard Bill singing her a lullaby: "I want a div-or-or-or-orce. I want a div-ororor-orce."

And Bill's former chief of staff Betsey Wright said the couple

again came close to separating later that decade.

If the Clintons had divorced, they would have been more fathomable. Instead, as Mary Mel French noted: "The Clintons are complicated because they stayed together."

The intriguing question, as Hillary battles on in her own quest for the presidency, is why she has chosen again and again to give her "Hound Dog" another chance.

Sixteen years ago this month, just as Bill was facing his first presidential primaries, a woman called Connie Hamzy told Penthouse magazine that he had propositioned her in a hotel lobby. He acknowledged that he knew her, but denied any impropriety.

Hillary's reaction was chillingly succinct: "We have to destroy her story."

Connie Hamzy faded away, only to be replaced by a queue of other women claiming sexual relationships with Bill.

And throughout it all his wife stayed at his side, apparently supporting his denials and usually helping him try to silence or rebut the stories of women who claimed anything from sexual harassment and assault to 12-year affairs.

Take the time a supermarket tabloid named no fewer than five mistresses, including a nightclub singer, Gennifer Flowers

When the story broke, Hillary was campaigning elsewhere, so Bill called her to warn her.

After the conversation, according to one report, "there was no scorn or sense of betrayal in her voice; she had long since accepted her husband's past and focused on winning a political future that would reward them both."

Indeed, Hillary gave a TV interview in which she said her husband's dealings with Flowers had an entirely innocent explanation: "Anybody who knows my husband knows that he bends over backwards to help people who are in trouble and is always willing to listen to their problems." 

American reporters promptly backed off.

Much later, Bill finally admitted under oath that he had indeed been involved sexually with Flowers - "a relationship that I should not have had."

Did Hillary know this at the time the scandal erupted? If so, she gave no sign.

Like her husband, she took offence whenever anyone publicly doubted her word. But after the Flowers episode, she secretly worked with New York lawyer Susan Thomases and Wright to contain any more "bimbo eruptions."

Subsequently, Jack Palladino, a San Francisco private detective, was secretly paid $100,000 to dig up dirt on a number of women who were likely to be trouble.

The idea was that, out of fear of exposure of their private lives, they would be convinced to sign affidavits denying they had been sexually involved with Bill.

"The Clintons were saying: 'This is the only way to fight them,'" said Arkansas lawyer Webster Hubbell, who helped the search.

"Anyone who criticised the Clintons, we wanted to know what was in their background and what might be in their closet. It was: 'Who did she sleep with and who were her boyfriends?'"

These were tough tactics. But whether or not the Clintons love each other in the way of most happily married couples, there is no doubt about their commitment to the pursuit of political power.

In fact, for more than three decades this is what has bound them together when other aspects of their lives showed signs of crumbling.

In some ways, they remain an unlikely couple: the earnest Methodist overachiever who freely acknowledges "I don't do spontaneity" and the instinctively affable and loquacious charmer who makes everything look easy.

Hillary considers Bill a "force of nature." Yet nearly everything about him is contradicted by something else. His wide-ranging intellect can be overridden by lapses in everyday common sense. 

He is by turns empathetic and self-absorbed, focused and un-disciplined, cerebral and priapic, idealistic and cynical, honest and evasive, inspiring and mortifying.

Above all, he is intuitive. "He was capable of constant emotional scans of everyone in the room while he was thinking," recalled one close Clinton associate.

"He could recognise, quantify and calibrate a response to the emotional state of the person with him."

Yet another side of him was classic alpha male, supremely self-confident and tough, and capable of a fearsome temper.

Political consultant James Carville warned against being misled by Bill's "quarter-inch of softness. You'll break your finger if you mistake that for going all the way through."

The downside of Bill's magnetism was his compulsive need to seduce. He even made several plays for Laura Tyson, the high-powered chairman of his Council of Economic Advisers.

"Once we were talking about an article I had written," Tyson recalled, "and he said: 'You should come over and show me your article.' I thought: 'This is bizarre. So I said: "I'll just send it over.'"

Another time at a White House dinner he commented on her alluring evening gown, saying "You'd better not wear that to work," to which she replied: "Of course I'll never wear this to work."

Said Tyson later: "It is pretty good protection if you don't let on any sign that this [kind of pass] is happening. It will go away."

Others readily succumbed to Bill's charms.

With her cool manner and formidable will, Hillary had to work harder to win people over. Her extreme earnestness has earned comparisons to a school monitor and a member of the Salvation Army.

Many men were put off by her give-no-quarter nature. In the words of one opinion poll guru: "She reminds most men of their first wife - or mother-inlaw."

Hillary is as unsentimental as Bill is mushy. She once wrote to a friend: "Unthinking emotion is pitiful to me."

When Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis - widow of President John F. Kennedy - sent a cheque to Bill's presidential campaign in 1992, he immediately said: "We can't cash this." Hillary's reply: "Make a copy and then cash it."

Said Ann McCoy, a friend from Arkansas: "You get a hug from Bill and a solution from Hillary."

Her powers of concentration and rigorous self-discipline are legendary. "You can see her sometimes almost censoring the first and second and third thing that comes into her head," said her longtime friend Diane Blair.

Even Hillary has acknowledged having an "obsessive personality."

Her husband noted in the second year of his presidency, with a wave toward his large Oval Office desk: "I might as well try to lift that desk up and throw it through the window as to change her mind."

Nor does Hillary ever feel compelled to explain her certainties - or much else about her thoughts and emotions. This defiantly closed nature has fuelled a perception that she was withholding information during numerous official investigations into the Clintons' affairs.

In fact, playing the role of "hidden hand" is one she enjoys.

"She was extremely Machiavellian, a master of doing things that could not be traced back to her," recalled one close colleague. "She would say: 'Do this, but don't leave any fingerprints.'"

Hillary's own mother once observed: "She just does everything she has to do to get along and get ahead."

This includes gritting her teeth about Bill's compulsive womanising. Her patience has its limits, however, and in 1989 Bill sought professional help for what friends called his "problem."

"I thought he had conquered it," Hillary said a decade later. "I thought he understood it, but he didn't go deep enough or work hard enough."

Hillary herself has been dogged by rumors that she is a lesbian, dating back to Bill's days as Arkansas Governor. These have been based mainly on her assertive manner, her lack of interest in her appearance, her indifference to flirting, her husband's chronic infidelity and her large entourage of women staffers.

But there has never been any evidence of sexual involvement with another woman - or, indeed, another man. Politics is what counts.

When she and Bill learned that they had won the presidency in 1992, their first reaction was to laugh. Hillary told a friend that the victory was "like the dog that keeps chasing the car and all of a sudden catches it."

Bill, however, was not solely focused on his electoral triumph. On the day that they were due to leave Little Rock, Arkansas, he made a private farewell - the sort of risky encounter that was later to imperil his presidency.

At 5.15 am that Saturday, he was visited in the basement office of the governor's mansion by Marilyn Jo Jenkins, an energy-company executive.

State troopers who worked for him later made sworn statements that he and Jenkins had been seeing each other since the late 1980s.

Trooper Danny Ferguson testified that he had escorted Jenkins to see Bill four times in the days before the Clintons left Little Rock. Bill had also phoned her frequently in the preceding years, with one call - at 1.23am from a hotel in Virginia - lasting 94 minutes.

Predictably, both Jenkins and Bill denied they had a sexual relationship, and she claimed that he had only been helping her through a "personal crisis."

But he ultimately admitted that he had been to her apartment ten times, and his lawyer, Robert Bennett, later noticed that he had a "forlorn and wistful" look when he talked about her.

Jenkins, it seems, was the focus of one of the crises that nearly ended the Clinton marriage.

However, as the Clintons' bus neared Washington DC, Bill was clearly able to put her out of his mind. Indeed, according to witnesses, the First Couple - then aged 46 and 45 - retired to the rear of the bus and "canoodled."

These moments of physical contact were companionable rather than passionate, and reflected Bill and Hillary's mastery of what White House Press Secretary Michael McCurry later called "the science of how they interacted publicly" - the well-practised whisper, the peck on the forehead even in periods of terrible tension.

It was a skill in which Hillary revelled. On January 21, 1993, Bill's first full day in office, she and Bill shook some 1,800 hands in three hours.

"We just screwed all these people," she whispered to her husband - a comment heard on network television.

Once they were installed in the White House, Bill gave his wife primacy even above his Vice-President, Al Gore - a formidable politician with far greater experience - even though, as his un-elected spouse, she was barred by law from holding office.

She had eight friends - including former colleagues and school and university pals - in positions of power, while the Vice-President had just one.

Hillary and Bill were setting out to run the White House as one working unit: "Billary," as they had been known back in Arkansas.

It was a kind of compensation for Bill's extra-marital betrayals. As a senior official said: "The loss of gratification or dignity or fulfilment of one aspect of their relationship - marital fidelity - made him give her gratification, dignity and fulfillment in another."

But although Hillary was willing to accept what was in effect a co-presidency, she didn't necessarily accept that it gave Bill the right to continue his seductions.

This, said the aide, "explains the continuing high level of anger on her part - her resentment seething beneath the surface."

From the start of their reign, the Clintons' temperamental differences and the tensions in their marriage intruded on policy, politics and personnel.

The staff in Arkansas had become inured to Bill and Hillary's fierce arguing, but their Washington advisers found it "demoralising," according to adviser David Gergen.

When the Clintons "got into a row... the rest of us sat in embarrassed silence."

The most unnerving aspect of the Clintons' altercations was their use of profanity, especially "f***" and "s***" - particularly shocking in Hillary's case because of her slightly pious air.

"She can swear like a trooper," said one of her friends.

When a White House aide forgot a podium for an event in the White House Rose Garden in May 1993, everyone was taken aback when Hillary yelled at Bill: "What the f*** goes on here! What is your staff doing?"

Bill could also turn irritable. His profanity-fortified rages - "cuss words for five minutes," said Abner Mikva, a White House counsel - were legendary.

These "purple fits," as the staff called them, were invariably disproportionate to the offence that triggered them.

Given the fraught climate, no one was particularly surprised when a report surfaced that during a heated dispute between Bill and Hillary, a lamp had been smashed.

The anecdote came from the Secret Service, whose agents were posted within earshot of the family's living quarters on the second floor.

The story rapidly transmuted into a claim that Hillary had actually "thrown a lamp" at her husband - an assertion she publicly denied. But she never directly addressed what had gone on, and her private reaction showed frantic concern.

"Hillary said: 'We have a lot of enemies and we have to fight back,'" White House counsel Bernie Nussbaum recalled.

"She became more hardened. We found we couldn't trust a lot of people like the Secret Service and the staff, leaking rumours about Hillary-and-Bill fights."

At Hillary's request, a new team of agents was installed and they switched their posts from the second floor to outside the elevators downstairs.

In this, as in other respects, her word was law. "There is a saying," said one top administration official, "If Mama's not happy, nobody is happy."

The joint decision-making at the top was so overt that staff members called Hillary "The Supreme Court." Whenever Bill said "let me think about it," aides knew he intended to call Hillary.

"We would always say: 'Has the Supreme Court been consulted?'" recalled Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers.

White House counsel Abner Mikva said that Bill could act "like a baby" around his wife, calling her "Hirree."

Such was the balance of power in the relationship that it was the President of the United States who usually ended up helping their 12-year-old daughter Chelsea with her homework.

Once, he told a morning meeting: "I was up late, working on the Mesopotamians."

He did not hesitate to tap the resources at hand to help him out. The White House economics team assisted with some algebra problems, while the communications director had to find some border guards to give Chelsea information for an immigration project.

Significantly, when the nurse at Chelsea's school needed to get permission to dispense an aspirin, the First Daughter said: "Call my dad. My mom's too busy." The nurse did in fact reach the President easily, and he was only too eager to remain on the phone for a chat.

Meanwhile, Hillary's routine participation in West Wing meetings was upsetting the equilibrium of official White House life. She "had a real chilling effect," said one long-time aide.

White House Counsel Bernie Nussbaum observed that Bill "would try to avoid fighting with her if he could, deflecting her if he could. It was not easy. She would say: 'Do this or that.' He would then be more careful."

Often, Bill would arrive at the Oval Office feeling buoyant, "almost whistling as he whipped through papers," recalled adviser David Gergen. Then the phone would ring and Hillary would be on the line.

"His mood would darken," wrote Gergen, "his attention wander, and hot words would spew out. Had we seen the outrageous things his enemies were saying about him now? Why was his staff screwing him again? What,I would wonder, had she said to him now?"

Even more disconcerting were Bill's evening phone calls - what Communications Director George Stephanopoulos called the "nightcap" - when Bill would chew out an adviser while Hillary was nearby.

"It was completely at odds with the emotional tenor of the relationship that person had with Bill," said one top official.

"It was vicious. When she walked out of the room, everything changed. Then the tone would change completely and he would say: 'Why don't you come over and watch football?'"

In meetings, Hillary's dissatisfaction could curdle the atmosphere when she directed her ire at his subordinates. "It was her way of saying to Bill: 'You are incompetent. Look at how your staff treats you,'" said White House adviser Robert Boorstin.

"Rather than insult Bill directly, she used the staff. People were scared of her because they knew she could chop off their testicles if she so chose. You did not cross Hillary."

Adviser David Gergen described how, with a dozen or so of her husband's aides gathered round, Hillary would let loose a tirade. "She would launch a deadly missile straight at [Bill's] heart and just before it hit, the missile would explode, the shrapnel hitting the staff."

Her vocabulary had a common theme: that the President's men were "wimps." Recalled one aide: "It was: 'You don't have balls, no guts.' The language was so striking. It seemed that every criticism was dual purpose and could apply to him, but at the last minute she didn't apply it to him."

Bill would react by flushing crimson and lashing out at his staff. "She knew how to press his buttons," said the senior official. "It was a conscious pattern."

Later, as the extent of Hillary's power in the White House became known, former President Richard Nixon was moved to observe: "Hillary pounds the piano so hard that Bill can't be heard."

Vice-President Al Gore was the biggest victim. It was a given in the White House that Hillary had to "sign off on big decisions," and even before Clinton's inauguration, her adviser Susan Thomases was quoted saying that Gore "would have to adjust to a smaller role."

The effect was to add a new layer of intrigue and rivalry to the West Wing, where advisers and cabinet officers knew they could lobby either the First Lady or the Vice-President to reverse decisions by the President.

David Gergen called the "three headed system" a "rolling disaster."

"Of course there were tensions," said one of the Clintons' longtime friends, who recalled private meetings in which Hillary encouraged her husband to discount Gore's advice.

It was an open secret that some of Hillary's advisers nurtured dreams that she, not Gore, would follow Bill in the presidency.

Throughout the day, Hillary was invariably on the move, striding from one office to another, holding a yellow legal pad and sheaves of notes and documents, and wearing thick bifocals and no make-up.

But her political touch was by no means as sure as her husband's.

She insisted on producing a complicated plan for sweeping health reforms that would guarantee medical insurance for all, but refused to consult experts who didn't already agree with her.

Her figures were dismissed as mindbogglingly unrealistic - and even Bill, after studying the plan in detail, said: "My brain aches."

During a trip to Massachusetts, he dared to suggest that the reforms might be watered down. Back in Washington, Hillary reacted with fury. An aide recalled how she picked up the phone and told the White House operator: "Get me the President."

Moments later, Bill came on the line. "What the f*** are you doing up there?" she screamed. "I want to see you as soon as you get back."

Her tone was as "hard-edged" as her advisers had ever heard. Several hours later, Bill arrived by helicopter and walked into the Diplomatic Reception Room, where an aide was waiting to escort him upstairs.

The next day, he publicly retracted his comments and even apologised, promising that he aimed to implement the reforms in full. Even so, it was only a matter of time before Hillary's hugely unpopular plan was ignominiously dumped.

Her response? To blame a "conspiracy" - this time in the medical profession.

It was the same language she used against the mistresses who lined up to accuse her husband. But as we will see on Monday, those accusers were proving impossible to silence.

           Bill Clinton has been a CIA asset since he was an informer for them on his anti-war buddies at Oxford in 1968

The Clintons, the Bushes, Oliver North and the CIA were all heavily involved in the CIA drug trade of Iran-Contra

 “C’mon, Bill put your dick up. You can’t fuck her here.”  - Hillary to Bill at a political event.

“What the fuck do you think you’re doing? I know who that whore is. I know what she’s here for. Get her out of here.” - Hillary referring to one of Bill’s girlfriends.

 Chelsea Clinton in fact bears a striking resemblance to Webb Hubbell. She has very big lower lips and a weak chin … just like Hubbell. Bill has thin lips and a strong chin. The resemblance of Chelsea and Hubbell is most pronounced in pictures of Chelsea as a young teenager. The adult Chelsea has had plastic surgery to take out the Hubbell gumminess of her lower lips.

The fact that Chelsea is the biological daughter of Webb Hubbell - and she is - is the Clintons’s most shameful secret. 

After the Clintons moved into the presidential mansion, the political scandals multiplied – from use of the IRS and FBI to target political opponents to stalking and harassing subjects of Bill Clinton’s sexual advances and even attempts to loot taxpayer-funded items from the White House. Americans also witnessed capers such as Travelgate, Chinagate, Filegate and Pardongate.

            In 1989 Bill wanted to divorce Hillary and marry one of his girlfriends, Mary Jo Jenkins, but Hillary would not let him

During his 1992 campaign for the presidency, Bill Clinton was fond of promising America, “You get two for the price of one,” indicating Hillary Clinton would act as his co-president.

.