Main Stream Media Uses Negro as Scapegoat

Main Stream Media Uses Negro as Scapegoat
President Trump Unites All Americans Through Education Hard Work Honest Dealings and Prosperity United We Stand Against Progressive Socialists DNC Democrats Negro Race Baiting Using Negroes For Political Power is Over and the Main Stream Media is Imploding FAKE News is Over in America

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Teenage Girls Sexual Slaves for Epstein and Clinton? Bill Clinton, the X-Impeached President of the United States may be dragged in court again concerning sex with underage girls. Billionaire buddy Epstein is bracing for more legal problems as the rape and sexual toys are fighting for their rights.

Did the Clinton Foundation Pay off Sexual Abuse Victims?

Bill Clinton, the X-Impeached President of the United States may be dragged in court concerning sex with underage girls.  

Billionaire buddy Epstein is bracing for more legal problems as the rape and sexual toys are fighting for their rights. Florida attorney Brad Edwards and retired federal judge Paul Cassel filed the civil case against the federal government in U.S. District Court in Southern Florida in 2008, claiming federal prosecutors conspired with Epstein to keep the details of the plea deal under wraps in violation of the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act.  No one expects Hillary Clinton to answer any questions concerning her husbands sexual affairs with women, let alone teenage girls right out of high school.  Many people speculate that Clinton had lots of fun with the naked teenagers at 30,000 feet outside of the eyes of law enforcement, but the parents and the actual girls are done with Epstein or Clinton, not yet anyway. 






Daily News Staff Writer
Two young women who alleged abuse by billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein settled their lawsuits late Wednesday with him under a confidential agreement.
Attorney Spencer Kuvin confirmed that his clients, B.B. and C.L., settled their cases, but he could not disclose any details or amounts.
“My clients are happy that the whole process is over and that they have resolved their differences with Mr. Epstein,” Kuvin said. “They want to put this whole matter behind them and hopefully heal from the problems that they’re suffering from.”
B.B. and C.L. were among nearly two dozen young women who have sued Epstein for damages, claiming they were lured to Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion as minors to give him sexually charged massages and sometimes more.
C.L. and B.B. both were 15 at the time of their encounters with Epstein, 57.
Most of the lawsuits have settled. There are four victims with cases still pending.
Jane Doe is set for trial July 19 in federal court.
After serving 13 months in jail on criminal charges of soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution, Epstein is serving one year of probation at his El Brillo Way home



Epstein reached financial settlements with both women, who are now 28. Their current suit is against the Department of Justice, and a federal judge has only recently ordered the two sides to intensify settlement negotiations.  Most agree that Bill Clinton flew around the world several times with Epstein and took advantage of teenage girls.

By law, the women cannot receive financial damages from the government, but they are seeking "fundamental changes" to the justice system, Edwards said.  It seems that powerful people, like Bill and Hillary Clinton and others, forced a sweetheart deal for the child sexual abuser.  Many speculate that the Clinton's helped Epstein to stay out of jail for 25 years to keep Bill Clinton out of federal prison. 



Edwards said the women still hope that federal prosecutors, or a judge, will consider invalidating Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and consider filing criminal charges against him. They could also seek an apology from prosecutors or fines against the U.S. Justice Department which could benefit a crime victims' group, Edwards said.

“This legal challenge is incredibly unusual -- I have never heard of this happening before,” said John Malcolm, a former prosecutor in the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, now director of the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.

The investigation of Epstein and the plea deal that followed was a complicated matter involving multiple jurisdictions.

The Palm Beach Police Department opened an investigation into Epstein in 2005 after parents of a 14-year-old girl claimed the girl gave Epstein a “massage” at his Palm Beach estate for money. A subsequent investigation by the FBI allegedly found Epstein had paid at least 30 underage girls for sex.

The girls told police they were molested at Epstein’s $6.8 million Palm Beach mansion beginning in 1998 “regularly on a daily basis, and in most instances, several times a day,” according to court records. Girls claimed they were paid between $200 and $300 for each visit with Epstein.

A subsequent investigation by the FBI allegedly found Epstein had paid at least 30 girls ages 14 to 17 to “engage in illegal sexual activities.” That probe resulted in an 82-page prosecution memorandum and a 53-page indictment against Epstein and his female staff members. Although he was the target of state and federal investigations, it was state prosecutors who ultimately hatched the plea deal.

Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to one count of prostitution with a minor, registered as a sex offender, and spent 13 months in prison and home detention.

Under state and federal law, victims have a right to be present and “reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding.” Not only did the alleged victims not attend hearings regarding Epstein’s plea deal, key evidence assembled by authorities has remained sealed, Edwards said.

None of the parties would comment on the ongoing mediation.

“The government deliberately kept crime victims ‘in the dark’ so that it could enter into a plea arrangement designed to prevent the victims from raising any objection,” Edwards argued in court documents.

Those familiar with the criminal case against Epstein say the plea deal was extraordinarily lenient, and some suspect his friendship with powerful allies played a role.

One powerful friend of Epstein is former President Bill Clinton, who FoxNews.com first reported took 26 trips around the world aboard Epstein’s Boeing 727, dismissing his Secret Service detail for five of the trips.

Virginia Roberts, who claims that at age 15 she was a “sex slave” for Epstein and his friends, and is one of the plaintiffs in the ongoing civil case against the federal government, claims the plane was outfitted with a bedroom for orgies, earning it the name “Lolita Express.”

“Epstein required me to describe the sexual events that I had with these men, presumably so that he could potentially blackmail them,” Roberts said in an affidavit filed with the court. “Based on my knowledge of Epstein and his organization, as well as discussions with the FBI, it is my belief that federal prosecutors likely possess videotapes and photographic images of me as an underage girl having sex with Epstein and some of his powerful friends.”

One key piece of evidence from Epstein’s case was released last week by the Forida State Attorney General’s Office: a one-hour video showing the Oct. 20, 2005, search of his mansion. The video captured numerous salacious photos of young girls, some totally nude, as well as a photo of a child around 5 years old bending over in a short dress, adorning his walls.

Other Epstein items documented in the police video include a small stuffed teddy bear by his bedside, a professional dental chair and drill set in his bathroom, and Epstein in a photo standing next to a Catholic pope, but not shown are the hidden cameras found on his property.

Whether more evidence comes out now depends on the current lawsuit.

Kenneth Lawson, co-director of the Hawaii Innocence Project and faculty member at University of Hawaii Law School, believes the lawsuit has merit.


“The victims’ attorneys are alleging the government conspired with the defendant’s attorneys to circumvent their rights,” Lawson said. “This flies in the face of the Crime Victims Rights Act, and it shows bad faith on both parties -- the defendant’s attorneys and the government attorneys.”

No comments: