Director FBI James Comey, disappointed a nation today as being too weak or too afraid to take a stand against government corruption at the highest levels of the Barack Obama Administrative Socialist State. No charges against Hillary Rodham Clinton, per James Comey even though her actions were reckless and dangerous. James Comey FBI Director did everything but do his job as even the novice legal mind see the charges clearly so there must be more to the story.
Bill Clinton, some say, promised Black National Radical Negro DOJ Loretta Lynch promised her a job within the Hillary Clinton Socialist Administration which is clearly the case, although left to prove in open federal court.
FBI directory James Comey would toss you in federal prison for 25 years to life if you operated two secret email computer servers and left top secret documents and plans available to hackers around the world. National Security was breached and Hillary Clinton is responsible so the story is left without a finish.
The most corrupt Hillary Clinton wants to be president which will give her and Bill Clinton the perfect platform to destroy American while selling influence and hidden favors around the world.
The power of all the people is being moved to Donald Trump for President which will again investigate and charge Hillary Rodham Clinton, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.
The people will be heard and the laws will be enforced because Hillary Clinton isn't too big to fail and she will spend her last days in a federal prison.
If by chance you support Hillary Clinton, you as an individual, are part of a conspiracy against the United States and the rights of the people shall be protected by law found within the Constitution.
It is clear that James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and lastly Hillary Rodham Clinton do not deserve the support of the people, and the peoples voice will be heard and the shouting starts in November.
.
FBI, FBI Update - Saturday 07-02-2016 - FBI Criminal Investigators are at the Clinton Mansion, right now. The FBI and their investigative agents are now at the Clinton Mansion as part of the criminal investigation in Hillary Clinton and the Email Secret Server Scandal. FBI Confirming.
TOO BIG TO FAIL -
TOO BIG TO JAIL -
HILLARY CLINTON CRIME WAVE
Bill Clinton X Impeached President tried to influence DOJ Loretta Lynch recently by having a private and firm meeting with the DOJ. Now, the FBI is having a direct interview with Hillary Rodham Clinton - Inside the Clinton Mansion - Washington D.C. , Warrant Served.
Clinton Crime Family
CONFIRMED: Hillary’s Foundation Hid a $2.35 Million Foreign Donation from the Head of the Russian Govt’s Uranium Company that Had Business Before Hillary Clinton’s State Dept.—a Clear Violation of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Administration
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) director James Comey made five extremely damning claims in his Tuesday
press conference about Hillary Clinton’s private email server.
Though Comey found “evidence of potential
violation” of classified information laws on Clinton’s part, and though Comey
noted that people who did similar things would be punished, Comey nevertheless
told the American people that the FBI does not recommend an indictment against
Clinton.
Comey confirmed numerous details of the email
scandal including the fact that Clinton had information on her private server
that was classified when sent, which Breitbart News first reported in August
2015, nearly a full year ago. But Comey said that no reasonable prosecutor
would take on the case.
Comey’s harsh criticisms of Clinton’s conduct,
paired with his inexplicable decision not to call for an indictment, suggest
that Comey might have torn sympathies regarding the case. But the FBI director
said that the investigation was apolitical, despite Attorney General Loretta
Lynch’s recent secret meeting with Bill Clinton.
Here are the worst things Comey said about Clinton:
Evidence of violations
“In this case, given the importance of the matter,
I think unusual transparency is in order. Although there is evidence of
potential violation of the statutes regarding the handling of classified
information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a
case,” Comey said. “Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before
deciding whether to bring charges. There are obvious considerations, like the
strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent, responsible decisions,
and to also consider the context of a person’s actions and how similar
situations have been handled in the past.”
“In looking back at our investigations, into the
mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that
would support bringing criminal charges on these facts.”
A magnitude of classified information on her
server, and she did not hand over some emails
Comey confirmed the existence of vast amounts of
information on her private server that was classified when sent. Comey also
confirmed that Clinton did not hand over some of her emails, even though she
signed a sworn affidavit that she had done so. Whether or not Clinton will be
charged with perjury is still up to the Department of Justice. Even the
Washington Post left the door open for a possible “making false statements”
charge, though it seems unlikely considering the political implications here.
“From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the
State Department in 2014, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined
by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were
sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was top
secret at the time they were sent; 36 of those chains contained secret
information at the time, and eight contained confidential information at the
time. That’s the lowest level of classification,” Comey said.
“Separate from those, about 2,000 additional
e-mails were up-classified to make them confidential. Those e-mails had not
been classified at the time that they were sent or received. The FBI also
discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not among the group
of 30,000 e-mails returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014…”
“…With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found
that were not among those produced to the State Department, agencies have
concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or
received; one at the secret level and two at the confidential level. There were
no additional top secret e-mails found. And finally, none of those we found
have since been up-classified.”
She was careless
“Now, let me tell you what we found. Although we
did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended
to violate laws governing the handling of the classified information, there is
evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive,
highly classified information,” Comey said.
“For example, seven e-mail chains concerned matters
that were classified at the top secret special access program at the time they
were sent and received. Those chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending
e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails about those same matters.”
“There is evidence to support a conclusion that any
reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position or in the position of those
with whom she was corresponding about the matters should have known that an
unclassified system was no place for that conversation…
…None of these e-mails should have been on any kind
of unclassified system. But their presence is especially concerning because all
of the e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers, not even supported
by full-time security staff like those found at agencies and departments of the
United States government or even with a commercial e-mail service like Gmail,”
Comey added.
Hackers
Intelligence sources kept threatening that the
Russian government was prepared to release intercepted Clinton emails, which
would prove that Clinton’s email account was hacked and that information was
“lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed” through “gross negligence.” But the
Russians did not release that information in time, possibly so as not to open
themselves up to international legal and foreign policy pressure when they knew
the Obama administration wasn’t going to indict Clinton, anyway. The hacker
Guccifer also claimed that he breached Clinton’s private server, but he was
convicted on hacking charges during this election cycle.
“With respect to potential computer intrusion by
hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s
personal e- mail domain in its various configuration since 2009 was hacked
successfully. But given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially
involved, we assess we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence,” Comey
said.
“We do assess that hostile actors gained access to
the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton
was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary
Clinton’s use of a personal domain was both known by a large number of people
and readily apparent,” Comey said.
“She also used her personal e-mail extensively
while outside of the United States, including sending and receiving
work-related e- mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that
combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained
access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”
Somebody else would get punished
Would Clinton get off if she was somebody else?
Probably not. It’s weird that Comey admitted that.
“To be clear, this is not to suggest that in
similar circumstances, a person who gauged this activity would gauge no
consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security
or administrative sanctions but that is not what we are deciding now,” Comey
said.
“As a result, although the Department of Justice
makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to the justices
our view that no further charges are appropriate in this case.”
The New York Times has confirmed that Hillary Clinton violated the Memorandum of Understanding she signed with the Obama administration promising to disclose all foreign donations during her tenure as Sec. of State.
As Clinton Cash reveals, Ian Telfer, the foreign head of the Russian-owned uranium company, Uranium One, which Hillary Clinton approved to acquire U.S. uranium, made four individual hidden donations to the Clinton Foundation totaling $2.35 million, none of which appear in Clinton Foundation disclosures.
CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton Bagged $500,000 for a Speech in Moscow Paid for by a Kremlin-linked Bank
The New Yorker confirms that, as Clinton Cash claims, Bill Clinton made $500,000 for a Moscow speech that was paid for by “a Russian investment bank that had ties to the Kremlin” at the time of the Uranium One deal.
“Why was Bill Clinton taking any money from a bank linked to the Kremlin while his wife was Secretary of State?” asks the liberal publication.
CONFIRMED: Hillary’s Brother Sits on the Board of a Mining Company that Scored an Extremely Rare “Gold Exploitation Permit” in Haiti as Hillary and Bill Clinton Disbursed Billions of U.S. Taxpayer Dollars in Haiti
The Washington Post confirms the accuracy of Clinton Cash’s revelation that Hillary Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, serves on the board of a mining company that scored a coveted and lucrative “gold exploitation permit” in Haiti as then-Sec. of State Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton were doling out billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars in the wake of the Haiti earthquake.
According to the Post, Rodham’s mining company “won one of the first two gold-mining permits the Haitian government had issued in more than 50 years,” just as Clinton Cash reveals.
CONFIRMED: Hillary’s Foundation Hid a Foreign Donation of 2 Million Shares of Stock by a Mining Executive with Business Before Hillary’s State Dept.—a Clear Violation of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Administration
The Wall Street Journal confirms the book’s revelation that another foreign donation, one by Canadian mining executive Stephen Dattels, made a hidden donation of two million shares in Polo Resources that the Clinton Foundation chose not to disclose in violation of the Memorandum of Understanding the Clintons signed with the Obama administration.
“About two months later, the U.S. ambassador to Bangladesh pushed the energy adviser to that nation’s prime minister to allow ‘open pit mining,’ including in Phulbari Mines, where Polo Resources has a stake,” reports the Journal.
CONFIRMED: Hillary’s Approval of the Russian Takeover of Uranium One Transferred 20% of All U.S. Uranium to the Russian Govt.
The New York Times confirms, “The sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.”
The Times also verifies the book’s reporting that Hillary’s uranium transfer to Russia represented, at the time, a projected 50% of all U.S. uranium output.
CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton was Paid by a For-Profit Education Company Laureate While the Company Benefitted from an Increase in Funding from Hillary’s State Dept.
Bloomberg has confirmed that, as reported in Clinton Cash, Bill Clinton was paid by “Laureate International Universities, part of Laureate Education, Inc,” a position he abruptly resigned from on Friday.
Bloomberg’s examination confirms that “in 2009, the year before Bill Clinton joined Laureate, the nonprofit received 11 grants worth $9 million from the State Department or the affiliated USAID. In 2010, the group received 14 grants worth $15.1 million. In 2011, 13 grants added up to $14.6 million. The following year, those numbers jumped: IYF received 21 grants worth $25.5 million, including a direct grant from the State Department.”
The company nor the Clintons will release the exact amounts Bill received for working for the controversial for-profit education company.
CONFIRMED: The Clinton Foundation has Been Forced to Refile at Least 5 Years of Annual Tax Returns and May Audit Other Clinton Foundation Returns
Reuters has confirmed that “Hillary Clinton’s family’s charities are refiling at least five annual tax returns” as “the foundation and its list of donors have been under intense scrutiny.”
CONFIRMED: At Least $26 Million of the Clintons’ Wealth Comes from Speaking Fees by Companies and Organizations that are Also Major Clinton Foundation Donors
The Washington Post has confirmed in an article based on Clinton Cash that, according to the Post’s independent analysis, “Bill Clinton was paid more than $100 million for speeches between 2001 and 2013, according to federal financial disclosure forms filed by Hillary Clinton during her years as a senator and as secretary of state.”
Of that, reports the Post, “Bill Clinton was paid at least $26 million in speaking fees by companies and organizations that are also major donors to the foundation he created after leaving the White House, according to a Washington Post analysis of public records and foundation date.”
CONFIRMED: Clinton Cash author, Peter Schweizer, is Currently Conducting a Deep Dive Investigative Report on Republican Presidential Candidate Jeb Bush’s Financial Dealings
CBS News has confirmed that author Peter Schweizer is working on a similar investigation into GOP presidential candidate Jeb Bush’s financial records and relationships.
“The wide-ranging examination will appraise the possible 2016 contender’s involvement in Florida real estate deals, an airport deal that involved state funds while Bush was Florida’s chief executive, and Chinese investments in Bush’s private equity funds,” reports CBS News.
CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton Delivered Numerous Speeches Paid for By Individuals and Corporations with Pending Business Before Hillary’s State Dept.
ABC News has confirmed Clinton Cash’s reporting that myriad businesses and individuals paid Bill Clinton to deliver speeches even as their companies had business on Sec. of State Hillary Clinton’s desk.
“Records supported the premise that former President Clinton accepted speaking fees from numerous companies and individuals with interests pending before the State Department,” reported ABC News.
ABC News noted it found “an instance where paid and unpaid speaking appearances were conflated,” but that Clinton Cash’s essential “premise” is “supported by records” ABC News independently analyzed.
CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton Lied about Hosting a Meeting with Frank Giustra and Kazakh Nuclear Officials at Clinton’s Home in Chappaqua, New York
New York Times Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter Jo Becker confirmed in a one-hour Fox News television special on Clinton Cash that Bill Clinton lied when questioned about whether Clinton, Giustra, and executives from the Kazakh-owned nuclear company Kazatomprom ever met in Clintons’ home.
“When I first contacted both the Clinton Foundation—Mr. Clinton’s spokesman—and Mr. Giustra, they denied any such meeting ever took place,” said Becker.
“And then when we told them, ‘Well we already talked to the head of Kazatomprom, who not only told us all about the meeting, but actually has a picture of him and Bill at the home in Chappaqua, and that he proudly displayed it on his office wall.’ They then acknowledged that yes, the meeting had taken place.”
The Hillary Clinton campaign continues to struggle in its efforts to spin and distract from the growing pile of Clinton Cash facts mainstream media outlets have already confirmed and verified are correct.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment