Negro Slave Traders are Muslims, we know that
Muslims were the folks (slave hunters) who captured the slaves sent to America, largely out of
Africa. … The Muslims did the slave hunting and the slave trading, just like they're doing today. Barack Obama has been using Sharia Law ( Muslim ) against the American people from day one. He has never be open about it but he's been attacking or transforming the traditional America. Barack Obama sought retribution against all White People and non believers of Islam, for the past sins of slavery. Obama takes his retribution by taxing, like taught in the Koran Quaran, against the people not of Islam and he plans to destroy the United States, and right now, he's winning the race as Congress does not understand Islamic Extremism. Obama is an Extremist, Militant. Obama is allowing Iran to gain a Nuclear weapon as a tribute to Islam from the West to allow the followers of Muhammad to gain their retribution against the infidels (you). The New York Times will never touch the story, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN or even FOX News pushes away from the Muslim menace. The founders of America knew about the Muslim Slave Traders and things really have not changed.
They round up slave girls now, sell them, rape them or kill them. The Islamic Muslims have been slave traders forever. The Muslims have rounded up thousands of women and sold them off, raped and tortured them but Obama doesn't talk about that at all. There is no such think as a modern Negro as their race is trapped in their past history, which is always stated wrong, by people like Barack Obama.
Hillary Clinton has direct ties to the Muslim Brotherhood
The Muslims have always raped the Negro and sold them off and killing the ones that were hard to handle. The Muslims have not changed because the Koran Quarn Sharia Law allows the evil, in their minds.
The Negro was captured by the Muslim, sold off to slave traders and a few of them ended up in America, before it was America. The Negro Kings in Africa made deals with the Muslims and helped round them up, load the ships and keep the gold. Barack Obama history lesson was all wrong, always has been but he tells the story the Negro wants to hear and the Muslim wants to hear. Learning the truth, changes your mind about Barack Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood.
America's dealings with Islam following her founding. wonder
if they have even considered the words and actions of the third President of
the United States, Thomas Jefferson, especially his sense of reading their own
texts from the Qur'an and knowing just what his enemies thought. Let's take a
stroll down memory lane and expose Obama's lies on Islam, shall we?
First, keep in mind that Islam and terrorism have gone hand in
hand since its inception at the beginning of the 7th century. In fact, it's
founder Muhammad was a terrorist and used "religion" to band his
merry men together to conquer, rape and pillage.
For nearly fifteen centuries the world has faced the disease of
Islam, but our nation faced it head on when Thomas Jefferson, serving as the
ambassador to France, and John Adams, serving as the ambassador to Britain,
went to London to meet with Ambassador Abdrahaman, the Dey of Tripoli's ambassador
to Britain. Of course they met with Abdrahaman to negotiate a peace treaty, but
keep in mind that in Islam, the only peace is submission to Islam.
Islam requires jizya under Sharia law, you know that alleged
"harmless law" they want to impose here in the West.
Jizya is a per
capita tax levied on a section of an Islamic state's non-Muslim citizens, who
meet certain criteria. Obama is paying this Jizya tax now with federal dollars with federal grants.
The tax is and was to be levied on able-bodied adult
males of military age and affording power. So as Adams and Jefferson met, they
found out the price of peace was quite expensive.
If America wanted "temporary peace," a one-year
guarantee, it would cost $66,000 plus a 10% commission. "Everlasting
peace" was a bargain at $160,000 plus the obligatory commission.
This only
applied to Tripoli.
Other Muslim nations would also have to be paid.
The amount
came to $1.3 million. But there was no assurance that the treaties would be
honored.
In vain, Jefferson and Adams tried to argue that America was not at
war with Tripoli. In what way had the U.S provoked the Muslims, they asked?
Ambassador Abdrahaman went on to explain "the finer points of Islamic
jihad" to the Koranically challenged Jefferson and Adams.
Jefferson then wrote a letter to John Jay that read:
"The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws
of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who
should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their
right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make
slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim]
who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise."
This is loosely based upon the Qur'an's teaching from Surah 47:4
which reads,
"Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite
at their necks;
At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond
firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom:
Until the war lays down its burdens.
Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had
been Allah's Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them
(Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But
those who are slain in the Way of Allah,-
He will never let their deeds be lost."
So what happened?
Though the US, along with Great Britain and
France had paid a "tribute" for protection against piracy, once
Tripoli increased the tribute following Jefferson becoming President, he
refused to pay them the increase, though he did continue to pay until the end
of his presidency. Tripoli then declared war on the United States on May 10,
1801. This was the beginning of the First Barbary War.
Interestingly enough, before becoming President, Jefferson had
opposed funds be used for a Navy except to provide coastal defense. Gerard W.
Gawalt writes concerning Jefferson and the tribute payment:
After the United States won its independence in the treaty of
1783, it had to protect its own commerce against dangers such as the Barbary
pirates.
As early as 1784 Congress followed the tradition of the European
shipping powers and appropriated $80,000 as tribute to the Barbary states,
directing its ministers in Europe, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, to begin
negotiations with them.
Trouble began the next year, in July 1785, when
Algerians captured two American ships and the dey of Algiers held their crews
of twenty-one people for a ransom of nearly $60,000.
Thomas Jefferson, United States minister to France, opposed the
payment of tribute, as he later testified in words that have a particular
resonance today.
In his autobiography Jefferson wrote that in 1785 and 1786 he
unsuccessfully "endeavored to form an association of the powers subject to
habitual depredation from them.
I accordingly prepared, and proposed to their
ministers at Paris, for consultation with their governments, articles of a
special confederation." Jefferson argued that "The object of the
convention shall be to compel the piratical States to perpetual peace."
Jefferson prepared a detailed plan for the interested states. "Portugal,
Naples, the two Sicilies, Venice, Malta, Denmark and Sweden were favorably
disposed to such an association," Jefferson remembered, but there were
"apprehensions" that England and France would follow their own paths,
"and so it fell through."
Paying the ransom would only lead to further demands, Jefferson
argued in letters to future presidents John Adams, then America's minister to
Great Britain, and James Monroe, then a member of Congress.
As Jefferson wrote
to Adams in a July 11, 1786, letter, "I acknolege [sic] I very early
thought it would be best to effect a peace thro' the medium of war."
Paying tribute will merely invite more demands, and even if a coalition proves
workable, the only solution is a strong navy that can reach the pirates,
Jefferson argued in an August 18, 1786, letter to James Monroe:
"The
states must see the rod; perhaps it must be felt by some one of them. . . .
Every national citizen must wish to see an effective instrument of coercion,
and should fear to see it on any other element than the water. A naval force
can never endanger our liberties, nor occasion bloodshed; a land force would do
both."
"From what I learn from the temper of my countrymen and their
tenaciousness of their money," Jefferson added in a December 26, 1786,
letter to the president of Yale College, Ezra Stiles, "it will be more
easy to raise ships and men to fight these pirates into reason, than money to
bribe them."
With US merchant ships being attacked and Americans being
kidnapped he finally issued letters of marque and reprisal, which sent a groups
of privately owned war ships, that were approved by the government, to make war
against the Barbary Pirates. He utilized this constitutional measure, which we
are not using today.
In doing this he sent for the "privateers," as they
were referred to. The privately owned frigates USS Philadelphia, USS President,
and the USS Essex, along with the schooner USS Enterprise was America's first
navy to cross the Atlantic. Others would also join and see action as well.
Ultimately, in 1805 United States Marines crossed the desert
from Egypt into Tripolitania, forced the surrender of Tripoli and free those
Americans that had been kidnapped and were made slaves.
Thus, this is where the famous line from the United States
Marine Corps (Oorah!) comes from: "From the halls of Montezuma to the
shores of Tripoli. Demar says it not only refers to the First Barbary War, but
specifically to the Battle of Derna, which took place in 1805.
It is ironic the Rep. Keith Ellison, who became the United
States' first Muslim Congressman took his oath of office on Thomas Jefferson's
Qur'an at a time when we continue to be at war with Islam.
While Ellison has
called Jefferson a "visionary," what I think we could all learn is
that Jefferson was wise enough to read and learn about the enemy from their own
book of jihad.
Sadly, many today would rather listen to the lies of Islamists
rather than understand what the Qur'an actually teaches. After all, it's been
said "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
