Australian Rejects - Why would Australia dump rejects on America - why would if ever be requested? Former radical negro President Barack Obama signed the Australian-U.S. refugee deal during his last months in office because it was a very bad deal — promising to take the rejects - 1,250 Middle Eastern refugees off Australia’s hands.

Australian Rejects - Why would Australia dump rejects on America - why would if ever be requested? Former radical negro President Barack Obama signed the Australian-U.S. refugee deal during his last months in office because it was a very bad deal — promising to take the rejects -  1,250 Middle Eastern refugees off Australia’s hands.

The refugees are being held in detention centers (prisons)on Manus Island and Nauru Island isolated and, despite Trump’s original statement calling the deal “a dumb deal,” the first group of roughly 50 of the mostly male thugs and rejects, Middle Eastern refugees have already begun being resettled in the U.S., now how did Trump let this happen, piss off the Australians and tell them hell no.

Middle Eastern refugees who will need major mental health treatment are being resettled across five states in the United States, under an Obama-era immigration deal that President Trump has failed to shutter.

A Total Women's Strike is Called - Linda Sarsour - Rasmea Yousef Odeh - Angela Davis - Tithi Bhattacharya - A General Pussy Riot has been called - George Soros Funded Barack Obama Organizing for Action Hillary Clinton Bill Clinton Chuck Schumer Violence Work Stoppages Strike

A General Women's Strike is Hereby Called; The Women's March on Washington to protest President Donald Trump didn't go so well, pussy hats, vagina costumes and really weird celebrities shouting profanities that were called speeches failed to produce anything except some really disturbing facts about the Women's march. 

You can assume that Hollywood progressive elites will be there because it's a protest against U.S. legal citizens and the elected President Trump. 

A main principle organizer, Islamic of course, Linda Sarsour; is a real life convicted Palestinian terrorist. A Rasmea Yousef Odeh spent about 10 years in prison for two terrorist bombings in Israel, killed two students.  One way or another the convicted terrorist became a U.S. citizen in 2004 by lying and cheating the system just like the terrorist did under radical Barack Obama and his side kick Hillary Clinton. 

She ran with the lie for about 10 years but then was convicted of immigration fraud, in 2014 which is a long time for a convicted terrorist to wander your neighborhood. But she has a new trial set now, because of the inept Obama Clinton Kerry Schumer government blind spot, she has PTSD you might know which made her lie but she did manage to get a job as a navigator with ObamaCare. 

You also might remember Angela Davis, the Communist professor and old time Black Panther when they wanted to kill all the White People.  She got famous during her participation in that courthouse shootout that killed a judge, when she won a get out of jail card she floated to Cuba, Obama's Cuba, where Fidel and Raul Castro guard the little radical criminal. 

Then there's somebody called Tithi Bhattacharya, a strong Maoist, and you should know Maoists have been found on the terrorist list. 

This Women's Strike is being paid for by friends of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer and others but George Soros is the checkbook urging dumb girls to walk of their jobs.  The idea is to walk off your job, block some roads and bridges and boycott cooking, cleaning or skip sex as you help boycott any pro-Trump business, and don't forget to wear red in solidarity, clean up your pussy hat and rock and roll. 

.

The Tombstone Legacy of Barack Obama, Big Plans, Big Problems, Barack Obama Presidential Library, On Hold, The Grand Monument Memorial was to be part of the Barack Obama Presidential Library Complex as a tribute to the first African American President of the United States. There were also grand plans for a Barack Hussein Obama Foundation as a charity institution organized to help colored people around the world and also in the United States.

The Grand Monument dedicated to the fanatical dyed in the wool Socialist Barack Hussein Obama project has been put on hold, some say due to budget restrictions but others know the truth. http://www.clintontarium.com

The Grand Monument Memorial was to be part of the Barack Obama Presidential Library Complex as a tribute to the first African American President of the United States.  There were also grand plans for a Barack Hussein Obama Foundation as a charity institution organized to help colored people around the world and also in the United States.

The Memorial planners that have been working on the actual blueprints for the project say that the Barack Obama Presidential Library Complex in Chicago went from memorial library to some kind of foreign shrine.

A Presidential Library is a tribute to an American President but many backers are pulling away from the Barack Obama shrine envisioned by Barack Obama as the founding was simple enough but the formation of a board of directors is almost impossible after the revelations of eye-opening corruption within the DNC Democratic Party with direct ties right back to the Obama White House.

The Presidential Library, with taxpayer money plus private donations will have to make certain assurances that the Obama Foundation will warrant and certify all their donations, expenses, and workings with the United States Government.

With a GOP Republican Government it will require a lot more than a promise offered by Hillary and Bill Clinton who then went out and gathered up to $2 Billion dollars from foreign nations.

It seems, that the Barack Obama Grand Memorial is turning out to be the tombstone for Barack Obama and his gravestone legacy.

It is doubtful that President Donald Trump GOP will pursue or track back into all the illegal actions of President Barack Obama but President Trump's shadow will always linger over the failed President Barack Hussein Obama.

Donald Trump plans on leaving the porch light on, just in case.

The Black American's turned away from Hillary Clinton, which was a direct reflection on the failed Barack Obama,

.

Where's the Gold Now - World Trade Center 09-11 $650 million in gold and silver was being kept in a special vault four floors beneath Four World Trade Center.

The attacks of September 11th, 2001 will forever be mired in doubt and suspicion by millions of people who saw the events live on their televisions. Almost immediately following the attacks theories began to emerge.

Were the hijackers operatives for a Western intelligence service? How did a passport from one of the terrorists survive completely unscathed, only to be found later amidst the rubble of the Trade Centers? How did WTC Building 7 collapse even though it was never struck by an airplane? Why was President George H.W. Bush meeting with members of the Bin Laden family at the very moment of the attacks? Were the planes that hit the buildings actually commercial airliners or were they remotely operated drones? Why was the entirety of Ground Zero quickly sanitized and shipped to China for recycling before any investigation ever took place? And, what are the odds that on the very day terrorists used planes to attack the Pentagon and World Trade Centers, the U.S. military was holding exercises simulating hijackers crashing planes into buildings, a circumstance that led to total confusion across the United States and a complete failure of national defense?

These questions and thousands more have been the subject of  fervent debate for over a decade, and like the Kennedy assassination, may never have an official answer.

But just as has been the case with the investigation of JFK’s murder, new details and evidence continue to emerge surrounding the events of that day.

In a shocking report published by The Sun, 

former Federal Emergency Management Agency employee 

Kurt Sonnenfeld says he has evidence proving that certain insiders were privy to the

 attacks, perhaps even including President George W. Bush.

Kurt Sonnenfeld was working for the US Federal Emergency Management Agency, an organisation tied to the US Department of Homeland Security, when the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center took place.

…

After the planes crashed into the building, Kurt was given unrestricted access to ground zero – the site where the buildings once stood.

Armed with camera gear, the 39-year-old was asked to film everything he saw.

His documented evidence was supposed to form part of a report about what happened – but he never handed back the footage.

…

He says they want to silence him over what he saw beneath World Trade Center 6, evidence he is convinced paints the Bush Administration as big players in the deadliest attack on American soil.

…

Sporting bleached blond hair, Kurt wove his way through the rubble of Manhattan’s downtown financial district.

He shot hours of footage but never handed it in.

Of particular interest was what he found beneath World Trade Center 6.

He says inside the building he came across a vault that had been cleared of its contents before the planes struck.

In a documentary filmed in Argentina, Kurt said the discovery is proof that America knew the attacks were coming, at the very least.

…

“One thing I’m certain of is that agencies of intelligence of the United States of America knew what was going to happen and at least let it happen,” he said.

“Not only did they know it was going to happen, but they in fact collaborated.”

It is given weight by a similar discovery on a basement door below World Trade Center 4.

According to a New York Times article, the door to a vault was still intact but it appeared as if somebody had tried to gain entry.

Behind the vault door were nearly a thousand tonnes of silver and gold.

According to 911 Research, the vault under WTC 4 was reportedly owned by COMEX:

Reports describing the contents of the vaults before the attack suggest that nearly $1 billion in precious metals was stored in the vaults. A figure of $650 million in a National Real Estate Investor article published after the attack is apparently based on pre-attack reports.

Unknown to most people at the time, $650 million in gold and silver was being kept in a special vault four floors beneath Four World Trade Center.

An article in the TimesOnline gives the following rundown of precious metals that were being stored in the WTC vault belonging to Comex.

Comex metals trading – 3,800 gold bars weighing 12 tonnes and worth more than $100 million

Comex clients – 800,000 ounces of gold with a value of about $220 million

Comex clients – 102 million ounces of silver, worth $430 million

Bank of Nova Scotia – $200 million of gold

It is of note to mention that Sonnenfeld’s wife died under mysterious circumstances shortly after he carried out his investigation. The cause of death? A bullet to the back of the head.

Sonnenfeld was charged with the murder but those charges were eventually dropped, at which point he fled to Argentina. He has since remarried and had two children.

The U.S. Department of Justice is now attempting to extradite Sonnenfeld back to the United States where he is once again being charged with his wife’s murder.

But Sonnenfeld says that the reasons behind the U.S. government’s push to bring him back to America are more nefarious than they are letting on, alluding to his intimate knowledge of the 9-11 Ground Zero crime scene as a potential reason for taking him into custody.

We know for a fact that gold was being stored under Trade Center 4. Perhaps similar riches were being stored under WTC 6.

That the vault was completely empty when Sonnenfeld carried out his investigation certainly suggests foreknowledge by highly placed insiders.

Article posted with permission from SHTFPlan.

Be Afraid Now Milleniums Hillary Clinton Plans on a Total Open U.S. Border - Meaning No Borders - Millions of Illegal Aliens flooding the United States - All receive citizenship, welfare, section 8, obamacare, phone, food stamps

Hillary Clinton has been clear, she will rule over the people of the United States and go around Congress the very first Day.  Open Borders means No Borders...

She would be the President who would bring about the complete and, possibly irreversible, dissolution of our nation’s borders.

A review of Clinton’s stated positions on the issue suggests she is perhaps the most extreme candidate on immigration ever to run for the office of the U.S. Presidency. Her views place her even further outside the mainstream of the American electorate than President Barack Obama, who systematically dismantled U.S. immigration law during his two terms in office.

Below are just a few of the extreme immigration positions held by Clinton.

(1) Expanding Unconstitutional Executive Amnesty

Perhaps one of the most radical aspects Clinton’s open borders platform is that she is openly campaigning on defending and even expanding President Obama’s unconstitutional executive amnesties.

“You can count on me to defend President Obama’s executive actions on DACA and DAPA when I am president,” Clinton said, referring to Obama’s 2012 (DACA) and 2014 (DAPA) executive amnesties, which gave work permits and access to federal benefits to millions of illegal immigrants.

Clinton’s campaign website states that, as President, she will “defend President Obama’s executive actions to provide deportation relief for DREAMers and parents of Americans and lawful residents.” Meaning, Clinton will allow millions of illegal immigrants to remain in the United States, receive work permits to legally fill American jobs, and get access to federal benefits paid for by U.S. taxpayers.

In addition, Clinton’s website says she will “extend those actions to additional persons with sympathetic cases if Congress refuses to act.”

If Congress continues its refusal to act on comprehensive immigration reform, Hillary will put in place a simple, straightforward, accessible system for parents of DREAMers and others with a history of service and contribution to their communities to be able to make their case and be eligible for deferred action as well.

However, as Sen. Jeff Sessions has pointed out, Congress has acted on so-called “comprehensive immigration reform” and it has rejected it. Sessions explains that the reason any executive-ordered amnesty is unconstitutional is because “the President’s action erases the laws Congress has passed in order to implement laws Congress has refused to pass.”

Sessions said that “Congress considered and rejected these changes to immigration law in 2006, 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2014.”

While Clinton is pushing for immigration policies that would expand migration rates, polls show that the American electorate overwhelming wants immigration levels to be frozen or reduced—including 92% of the GOP electorate and 83% of the American electorate overall.

Moreover, according to an October Rasmussen survey, most Americans still oppose Obama’s unconstitutional executive amnesty. A Kellyanne Conway poll found that by a 2-1 margin, voters believe that illegal immigrants should be encouraged to return home by shutting off their access to U.S. jobs and welfare.

(2) Amnesty Within 100 Days

Clinton has pledged to enact amnesty within her first 100 days in office. As NBC recently reported: “If elected, the former secretary of state has promised to build on President Obama’s executive actions and introduce comprehensive immigration reform during her first 100 days in office.”

Clinton’s website has explained that by “comprehensive immigration reform,” Clinton means full citizenship for illegal immigrants, which would give them welfare access, voting privileges, and the ability to bring over their family members through chain migration.

“As president, Hillary will fight for comprehensive immigration reform that provides a full and equal path to citizenship,” Clinton’s website states.

Full amnesty for the illegal immigrant population will cost U.S. taxpayers $6.3 trillion, according to a report from the Heritage Foundation.

Clinton’s pledge for amnesty perhaps explains why she won the endorsement of open borders advocate Luis Gutierrez–who has previously said “I have only one loyalty… and that’s to the immigrant community.”

In return, Clinton has heaped praise on Gutierrez, declaring that “few people have done as much as Luis to make sure that when it comes to America’s policies on immigration, those policies reflect America’s values. He organizes, strategizes, preaches, teaches, inspires, cajoles, whatever it takes to keep this movement moving forward.”

Interestingly, Paul Ryan also won the early endorsement of Gutierrez prior to being elected as House Speaker. As Bretibart News has previously reported, Ryan’s views on foreign migration, foreign trade, and foreign wars are more similar to Hillary Clinton’s views than those of GOP presumptive nominee Donald Trump.

(3) Freezing deportations

Clinton has said that, as President, that she will essentially freeze deportations.

“I would not deport children. I do not want to deport family members either,” Clinton declared in March. Clinton’s pledge not to enforce U.S. immigration law as President represents an essentially unprecedented departure from the nation’s history of enforcing immigration law.

The Center for Immigration Studies’ Mark Krikorian described Clinton’s pledge as “a breathtaking step toward open borders.”

As the Washington Post reported: “Clinton’s pledge not to deport any illegal immigrants except violent criminals and terrorists represents a major break from President Obama, and it could vastly increase the number of people who would be allowed to stay in the country.”

Clinton’s vision erases entirely the protections that U.S. immigration laws are supposed to afford American citizens: such as protecting Americans from losing a job to an illegal immigrant, preventing the sapping of school and hospital resources, as well as defending the voting privileges and enfranchisement of U.S. citizens (giving citizenship to illegal immigrants allows them to cancel out the votes of native-born American citizens).

The implication of Clinton’s platform– i.e. that illegal entry is not in and of itself a deportable offense–represents a central pillar of the open borders credo: namely, that millions of people can illegally come to the country, take jobs, attend U.S. schools, receive affirmative action, apply for federal benefits, and give birth to children who receive birthright citizenship.

Moreover, waiting until after a violent conviction has been obtained to deport an illegal alien means that immigration laws were enforced far too late–i.e. they were not enforced until after an American was victimized, raped, or murdered by a criminal alien. A federal policy that waits to enforce immigration laws until after there is a criminal conviction would mean admitting and releasing criminals by the hundreds of thousands, and letting them roam free until after they have committed a crime, and have been apprehended, tried, and convicted for that crime.

As Sen. Sessions has explained, immigration laws ought to remove criminal aliens before they are convicted of a violent crime. “Our goal should be to keep 100% of dangerous aliens out of the United States… we need to remove potentially violent offenders before they hurt innocent families—before the irreversible occurs.”

(4) There’s no need to secure the border because it’s already “the most secure border we’ve ever had”

Even as tens of thousands of migrants continue to pour across our southern border, Clinton has declared that the border is “the most secure border we’ve ever had”– suggesting that she does not feel it is necessary to take additional actions to secure it. Clinton argues that since the border is already secure, it is time to give amnesty to the millions of migrants who have entered illegally.

“We have the most secure border we’ve ever had… The Republicans, the opponents, no longer have an argument,” Clinton said during a March CNN/Univision Democratic debate. “We enhanced the border security. That part of the work is done… Everybody who I know who has looked at it says it is OK. We have a secure border. There’s no need for this rhetoric and demagoguery that still is carried out on the Republican side. You’ve run out of excuses. Let’s move to comprehensive immigration reform with a path to citizenship.”

(5) Closing Detention Centers

On her website, Clinton pledges to “end family detention and close private immigrant detention centers”.

“Hillary believes we should end family detention for parents and children who arrive at our border in desperate situations. We have alternatives to detention for those who pose no flight or public safety risk, such as supervised release,” Clinton’s website explains.

This again represents a radical step in further dismantling what little immigration enforcement is now in place. Clinton is essentially saying that she will not detain new incoming illegal immigrants, but will instead release them into the interior of the United States.

(6) Obamacare for illegal aliens

Clinton has repeatedly said that she supports giving Obamacare to illegal immigrants. Clinton’s website says that Clinton wants to “Expand access to affordable health care to all families… She believes we should let families—regardless of immigration status—buy into the Affordable Care Act exchanges.”

Chelsea Clinton echoed this sentiment while campaigning for her mother. “It’s so important to extend the Affordable Care Act to people who are living and working here, regardless of immigration status, regardless of citizenship status,” Chelsea Clinton said in March.

(7) Full path to citizenship

Clinton has pledged to use federal resources to ensure that millions of more foreign migrants are able to vote in U.S. elections:

There are millions of people in America who could be naturalized, but for one reason or another, they’re not. So let’s help more of our neighbors claim their rights. It’s so powerful, so precious, to be a citizen of the United States!

To be able to vote in our elections, to have a voice in our future, and I want to take down the barriers that are holding people back. So here’s a few things I will do: I will work to expand fee waivers, so more people seeking naturalization can get a break on the costs. I will increase access to language programs to help people boost their English proficiency. I will enhance outreach and education so more people know their options and are engaged in the process. I don’t want anyone who could be a citizen to miss out on that opportunity.

Polling data suggests that Clinton’s voter importation plan will overwhelmingly benefit the Democratic Party.

A 2011 Pew survey found that Hispanics have a more negative view of capitalism (55%) than do supporters of Occupy Wall Street (47%). A 2012 Pew Hispanic Center survey found that 75% of Hispanics prefer bigger governments that provide more services as opposed to smaller governments that provide fewer services.

Political scientists have documented how mass immigration helps Democratic politicians. As University of Maryland’s James Gimpel noted: “the enormous flow of legal immigrants into the country — 29.5 million 1980 to 2012 — has remade and continues to remake the nation’s electorate in favor of the Democratic Party.”

Reuters has similarly reported: “Immigrants favor Democratic candidates and liberal policies by a wide margin, surveys show, and they have moved formerly competitive states like Illinois firmly into the Democratic column and could turn Republican strongholds like Georgia and Texas into battlegrounds in the years to come.”

(8) Expanded refugee resettlement

Hillary Clinton has called for a massive expansion in Middle East migration.

As Donald Trump has observed, “Crooked Hillary wants a radical 500% increase in Syrian refugees.”

Indeed, last year Clinton called for admitting 65,000 Syrian refugees—on top of the roughly 30,000 refugees and asylees the U.S. already admits from the Middle East each year. Adding in refugees from across the Muslim world, this means that under Clinton’s plan, the U.S. would admit at least 105,000 thousand refugees from the Muslim world annually.

“I’ll work to ensure that every single refugee who seeks asylum in the United States has a fair chance to tell his or her story, this is the least we can offer people fleeing persecution and devastation,” Clinton said in December.

As Breitbart News has previously reported, below is a more detailed breakdown of Islamic migration that would occur in her first term under the minimum numbers she has put forward thus far:

 – 374,000 refugees/asylees from the Middle East during her first term, based on DHS data.

– 420,000 refugees/asylees from the Muslim world during her first term.

– 560,000 permanent migrants from the Middle East during her first term.

– 730,000 permanent migrants from the Muslim world during her first term.

According to a September 2015 Rasmussen survey, only 5% of likely voters said that they wanted the U.S. to admit more than 100,000 refugees from the Middle East.

Women oppose Clinton’s plan to bring more than 100,000 refugees from the Middle East by a remarkable 21-to-1 margin, with 84 percent opposing and four percent supporting.

Democrat voters oppose Clinton’s refugee plan by a 17-to-1 margin with 87 percent opposing and five percent supporting.

Most remarkably, 85 percent of black voters oppose Clinton’s refugee agenda with less than one percent of black voters supporting her plan.

Russian Sneak Attack Against the United States - New York City No Warning U.S. Attacked, Russian Submarines Launch Missiles Against America - Barack Obama Situation Room - Russian Sneak Attack Against the United States - New York City Hillary Clinton Eyewitness Report CBS AP News Headlines - nImportant Bulletin Washington D.C. Cleveland Detroit Chicago Pittsburgh Terrific Explosion - Downtown Washington Blast Origin Unknown Capitol Building Congress Flames in Washington D.C. Vladimir Putin Russian Communist Dictator

Update Headlines, Russian Attacks the United States - Vladimir Putin John Kerry states that it was just one Russian Fighter Jet Pilot went Wild, Hold your fire.  Pentagon Struggles to Respond and not React.  “Just one moment, please. Here’s an important bulletin from our newsroom, just handed me. It’s date-lined Washington, D. C. - Barack Obama, President of the United States to speak to the American people at 0900 EST Hours - Situation Room White House Russian has launched a surprise attack against the United States, by taking actions against USS Reagan and is considered a direct attack and military threat against the United States. 

No Warning U.S. Attacked, Russian Submarines Launch Missiles Against America - Barack Obama Situation Room - Russian Sneak Attack Against the United States - New York City Hillary Clinton Eyewitness Report CBS AP News Headlines - Important Bulletin Washington D.C. Cleveland Detroit Chicago Pittsburgh Terrific Explosion - Downtown Washington Blast Origin Unknown Capitol Building Congress Flames in Washington D.C. Vladimir Putin Russian Communist Dictator 

“A terrific explosion has just wrecked downtown Washington. The blast, of unknown origin, seems to have damaged communication lines out of the city.  It is now considered that Russia - Vladimir Putin has launched a attack against the United States using nuclear submarines off the Eastern Coast of the United States, unconfirmed. 

“I can’t tell you any more because there is no more to the bulletin. So, until further news comes in we’ll return to our.  ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, FOX News. 

“Wait! Here! The explosion leveled the Capitol building where Congress, the Cabinet and all high officials were planned to gather to hear the President deliver an important message concerning Islamic Jihadist violence in Syria, Iran and Iraq.  Everybody is believed killed unconfirmed report; Washington is in flames!

“Another bulletin! This one’s from New York. New York’s financial district, Wall Street the nerve center of the nation’s industry, was battered by a blast from a bomb apparently dropped by an unidentified plane. . . . possible missile from Russian submarine. 

“My God, here’s more! Four other cities Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago and Pittsburgh have also been attacked by what some scientists think are atom bombs!  Nuclear weapons, airborne possible, maybe terrorist planted bombs.  Iran is speaking at this very moment talking about the destruction of America.  

“Yes, that’s what it looks like a sneak nuclear atom-bomb attack! I’ve got a thing here that says the Associated Press can’t raise its Washington Bureau. Communications between that city and the rest of the country seem to be broken of.  Emergency systems of the DOD Department of Defense are being used to communicate outside of the Washington D.C. beltway.  Nation at death-con threat level.  DHS Department of Homeland Security primary headquarters reported destroyed by massive explosion. 

“Bridges leading out of the city of New York are blocked by frantic mobs trying to escape. Roads are completely choked.  New York to New Jersey, no transportation available. 

“Here’s an eyewitness report from Cleveland. The shrieks and moans of dying people, trapped in the ruins of this once-great industrial city can be heard on every street in downtown Cleveland. . . . 

“And here’s a Detroit story! At this moment frightened crowds are storming auto warehouses in an hysterical effort to obtain vehicles with which to flee the city. . . . City buses are not running, limited train services, people are stealing cars to escape the city, no movement reported, total shutdown of transportation, electrical generation spotty and many parts of the city blacked out, looting reported in Urban areas.

“What? What’s that? Our engineer just told me that CBS monitors have picked up a broadcast from Moscow. Vladimir Putin is telling the Russian people that an atom bomb attack has been launched against the United States! Communist Red armies are marching against Western Europe!”  Ukraine has been taken.  Russian fighter jets are raiding U.S. Naval vessels in international waters.

IF Americans are lucky, that broadcast will never take place except as an admittedly imaginary account. But it could be true! According to official Government reports on the effectiveness of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki nearly five years ago, the fictitious chain of events described by our fictitious announcer could happen here!

So-called experts deride the suggestion that Russia could, in the near future, launch a successful atomic attack against this country. We hope they are correct. But, it’s difficult to forget that these same experts said Japan couldn’t last more than six months in a war against the U. S. and that Russia’s army would fold before the Wehrmacht. Other scientific experts also predicted that the Soviets could not possibly develop the atomic bomb before another five years. Well, look what happened!

Now, these same experts want us to believe that while Russia may have one or two bombs, she couldn’t possibly have enough with which to attack us. But Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer, one of the world’s foremost atomic scientists, said that a country could produce 1000 atomic bombs in two years by an all-out effort. The Russians have been working on the atom for longer than that!

We hope the Russians are not prepared to launch an atomic war against the United States. We hope they have no intention of ever doing so. But let’s play it smart this time and assume that the Reds have as many bombs as we have, and the means to deliver them to targets in America. What then?

In quest of the answer, government authorities in the field of atomic warfare were queried. Here’s the picture they painted.

We dropped two atom bombs on Japan— one each on Hiroshima and Nagasaki—on August 6 and 8, 1945, causing terrific destruction. Hiroshima, a city of 343,000— about the same population as Denver or Rochester- was practically wiped off the .map. The official death toll was 78,150—one out of every four persons was killed! Nagasaki, with a population of 253,000, had a fatality list with close to 40,000 names on it equivalent to the total population of, let’s say, Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Already, the type of bombs used on these cities has been outmoded. So, just imagine how much destruction could be wrought on heavily-populated American cities by the more destructive bombs developed in the intervening five years!

What would happen if just one bomb were dropped on the Capitol building in Washington, D. C, keeping in mind that devastation elsewhere would be even greater than in this “city of magnificent distances.”

Practically every building within a half-mile radius would be completely destroyed. Steel frames might be left standing but their walls would be stripped off by the mighty puff. Save in a few cases of exceptionally good construction, roofs and ceilings would collapse from the blast pressure and bury everybody inside. And remember, we’re assuming that only one bomb would be dropped!

Within this same half-mile radius, any living creature directly exposed to the blast would be killed immediately. Contrary to common belief, most immediate deaths would not come from radio-activity but from burns. A policeman standing on the Mall, 2000 feet from the explosion near the Capitol, would be fatally burned by the immense heat radiated by the bomb during the first split second.

Some of the Congressmen at the Capitol would die of ruptured internal organs. Those not killed immediately by flash burns or blast injuries might well perish beneath falling walls or in fires breaking out from damaged wiring and broken gas lines. At Hiroshima, only 15 in 100 deaths came from radiation sickness the great majority might have been caused by any ordinary bombing. However, many other persons in this half-mile radius who escaped death initially, would probably die a few days later from radiation sickness.

In the area a half-mile to a mile from the explosion, most buildings would still receive major damage. The White House, much of which was built more than a century ago, would be smashed with the exception of the newly constructed East Wing.

In this area, deaths would taper off somewhat. Many of those exposed to radioactivity without shielding would become severely ill and then die. But some people would escape harm completely. The chances? About 50-50.

In the great swath a mile to a mile and a half from the explosion, damage would taper off still more. Modern buildings would remain standing but would require extensive repairs.

Deaths would be reduced but many would perish in the fires enveloping damaged structures and from injuries received in their collapse.

Beyond a mile and a half, death and damage would continue their toll although in lessening degree. Two miles away, the well-built structures would survive although flimsy buildings would suffer heavily. Even the Pentagon Building, three miles from the Capitol, would lose many of its windows.

Four miles from the center of the blast, there’d be almost no destruction and no injuries—only a memory of a muffled groundshaking rumble.

In other target cities, the effects would be similar. Relief and rescue work would be hampered in all places by blocked streets, broken water mains, failure of electric power and general panic. Medical supplies would be critically short, particularly unguents for burns. Hospital facilities would be completely inadequate, especially considering the fact that many units would be destroyed by the bomb itself. Remember that at Hiroshima nine-tenths of the doctors and nurses were casualties because hospitals were located in the center of town.

What would be the Russian plan of attack? Well, current American strategic plans are based upon the ability of the B-36 to deliver the bomb to Russian targets. The bulk and difficulties in handling the bombs would probably rule out the use of Fifth Columnists, submarines or guided missiles. So, the Russian bombs would probably be delivered by suicide bombers carrying . enough gas for a one-way trip or by super-bombers which could make the return trip. Word has leaked out of Russia that a new super-bomber has been produced there so that might very well be the vehicle of attack. Could they reach American target cities from their trans-Polar bases undetected? That depends upon many factors. Congress has appropriated funds for the beginnings of a protective radar net. Such a net, however, is like a chain—only as strong as its weakest link. To be completely effective, it must be all-inclusive, with stations in Canada and Mexico and on ships at sea. This is a tremendously expensive setup.

To take advantage of such a warning system we would need thousands of fighter aircraft and a well-planned system of civilian defense including specially built shelters. These facilities do not exist at present. Planes flying over Canada now would cross thousands of miles of wilderness where the few inhabitants would have little idea of whether they were Russian bombers or Hottentot airliners. And, if the planes carried standard U. S. Air Force markings indicating that they were experimental types, even the Air Force might be fooled temporarily.

Aside from the material damage, what would be the probable outcome of such an attack? Well, first of all, the nation would be paralyzed by shock for a short while. The wounds would be so great, there would be a tremendous job to do merely in overcoming the first stunning effects of the surprise attack.

If most responsible members of our Government were wiped out, there’d be the question of who would assume responsibility. Probably a few members of Congress, who had happened to escape death because of absence from Washington, would set up an emergency government, even though they lacked constitutional authority. Or, high-ranking military officers might form a junta to rule dictatorially.

Of course, the 50 states would still exist and exert their individual authorities but their governors would have no federal authority. However, they might even meet and set up an emergency government.

Surviving military officers would have to thrash out the problem of who was to take command. Only after all this was accomplished could retaliation be started—unless earlier orders had been issued providing for action in case such an attack took place.

Could Russia actually carry out a physical invasion? Not immediately. First of all, she lacks ships to carry her armies for her merchant marine is not big enough for the job. As for aerial invasion, probably not even the United States with its tremendous industrial establishment could produce and keep in the air the tremendous number of planes needed for this. So, it would boil down to a war of waiting—waiting for an eventual invasion or waiting for more atom bombs.

Would we be defeated? We might. Possibly we would not recover quickly enough from the first sneak bombings and follow-up attacks to be able to prevent the Red armies from taking over Western Europe. This loss would mean isolation for the United States. And European shipping in Russian hands might bring invasion forces later.

But it is more likely that we would still be able to reassemble our forces and stage an effective war. Even all the factories in such cities as Cleveland would not be totally destroyed by atomic bombing. And in those factories badly damaged, the machinery could probably be put back in operation after repairs. Our defense forces would still remain intact for the most part. We might even be able to rush enough help to save part of Western Europe. In any event, if defeat is averted, there’d be a long stalemate with years of misery and anxiety for the whole world.

Can we prevent it? A well-planned system of defense might do it. With a good warning system our own fighter planes could shoot down a large part of the attacking bombers. The same warning system, coupled with adequate civilian defenses, might avert as much as 80 per cent of the casualties. Dispersion of our industrial resources—removing them from vulnerable centers—would cut down on initial losses, too.

We can also keep building better planes to carry the bomb and more and better bombs. But, let’s not fool ourselves. The best defense against atomic destruction is peace. And peace comes only with real international understanding—something that has to be worked at consistently. True, everybody must work toward the same goal—Russia as well as the United States. But the organization which can be used to insure peace—the United Nations —is there, all set up and waiting for a chance to be allowed to prove itself.

No longer can we assume that Hiroshima won’t happen to us. It can! It might!

.