The Bitch of it; Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett knew about the unprotected private Clinton server; The Clinton Shield is failing, They’re (FBI) ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public. Comey FBI is ready but Loretta Lynch DOJ is holding back by the orders of Barack Obama.

The Clinton Shield is failing, They’re (FBI) ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public.  Comey FBI is ready but Loretta Lynch DOJ is holding back by the orders of Barack Obama. The big media is protecting Hillary Clinton but the Clinton shield is failing.  The FBI is about to burst on the scene with an indictment, but if the radical Lynch won't do their job they are going around her and go public with documents and proof of the Clinton illegal actions. 

The bitch sold her country down the river, leaving SAP Top Secret Documents unprotected on her home brewed computer server.  Experts agree, Iran, Russia and North Korea has been turning our secrets almost from day one.  Clinton's illegal activities cannot be hidden much longer as the FBI has enough for a Grand Jury.  The DNC progressives are hoping to get Hillary through Iowa and New Hampshire but her shields are fading.  American's don't want another traitor to the nation like Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, Cheryl Mills, George Soros, Bill De Blasio and thousands of others..

Hillary Clinton continues to support the Muslim Brotherhood (CAIR) in that they promise to deliver votes to the DNC, The head of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said that Muslims could comprise the swing vote in the presidential elections if 1 million of them register to vote, as he urged them to turn mosques into polling stations this November.

“I believe we have at least 1 million Muslim eligible voters in this country. We have to register every single Muslim to vote in 2016. The Muslim vote can be the swing vote in major states,” CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad said at the Muslim American Society (MAS) and Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) annual conference in Chicago, according to video posted earlier this month.

Saudi Arabia’s Permanent Committee for Islamic Research and Issuing Fatwas[1]—religious decrees that become law—issued a fatwa, or decree, titled, “Duty to Hate Jews, Polytheists, and Other Infidels.” Written by Sheikh Abd al-Aziz ibn Baz in 1999, former grand mufti and highest religious authority in the government, it still appears on the website.

According to this governmentally-supported fatwa, Muslims—that is, the entire Saudi citizenry—must “oppose and hate whomever Allah commands us to oppose and hate, including the Jews, the Christians, and other mushrikin [non-Muslims], until they believe in Allah alone and abide by his laws, which he sent down to his Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings upon him.”

To prove this, a  number of Koran verses that form the doctrine of Loyalty and Enmity—the same doctrine every Sunni jihadi organization evokes to the point of concluding that Muslim men must hate their Christian or Jewish wives (though they may enjoy them sexually).

These Koran verses include:

“Do not take the Jews and the Christians for your friends and allies” (5:51)

“You shall find none who believe in Allah and the Last Day on friendly terms with those who oppose Allah and His Messenger [i.e., non-Muslims]—even if they be their fathers, their sons, their brothers, or their nearest kindred” (58:22; see also 3:28, 60:4, 2:120).

After quoting the verses, Baz reiterates:

“Such verses are many and offer clear proofs concerning the obligation to despise infidels from the Jews, Christians, and all other non-Muslims, as well as the obligation to oppose them until they believe in Allah alone.”

Hillary Clinton is on her last leg, some doctors say; With just a week to go before the Iowa Caucus, Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s speech was interrupted for nearly one minute of continued coughing before someone gave her a cough drop.

Speaking to the Jewish Foundation of Greater Des Moines, Clinton talked about the Iran nuclear deal, and said, “How we handle enforcement in the coming months will set the tone for years to come. So we have to get it right. There must be consequences.” After getting her coughing somewhat under control, the former secretary of state attempted to use tough talk in a barely audible voice.  

The journalist whose lawsuit forced the release of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails filed a motion Monday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that the State Department’s requested delay on its last release of more Clinton emails will mean that the U.S. voting public will be “irreversibly harmed.”

Lawyers for Jason Leopold, a Vice News reporter, said in the motion that State’s latest delay — which the agency blamed on Winter Storm Jonas — would push the final email release to Feb. 29.

That would be after Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina had all voted in their respective caucuses and primaries.

Originally, the judge on the case had ordered all of the emails released by Friday, Jan. 29 — just days before Iowa’s Feb. 1 caucuses.

“Because of the momentum a candidate can garner by winning in early voting states, many other Americans outside these states may disengage from the Democratic primary process if a single candidate wins most or all of the early states, believing that candidate to be the inevitable nominee,” the filing says. 

“Allowing State to delay the release of thousands of pages of a presidential candidate’s work emails, especially when they have already garnered so much media and public attention, until after four states have voted and just hours before another 11 states and American Samoa will vote, would deny Mr. Leopold of the opportunity to realize the fruits of his year-long pursuit of these records which he and the public have a legal right under FIOA to obtain.”

If the court grants the delay, a “substantial portion” of U.S. voters will be forced to make their electoral decisions without information they’re entitled to about one of the leading candidates, the lawyers argued.