FISA Warrants - FBI Hillary Clinton DNC Clinton Foundation

President Donald Trump is being urged to ignore the radical judge and investigate why Barack Obama was in the judges back yard 24 hours before the illegal court action took place. Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton airport meeting, it's happening again. The judge and Obama were Harvard pal's, both radical, both dumber than dirt but maybe we can get school records now.

The first federal judged to be jailed,Hawaii Obama Judge Rules Every court decision in the 200 years prior to this has said that people who are not citizens of the United States, who are not present within the United States, have no First Amendment constitutional rights. The Constitution doesn’t extend internationally to anybody, anywhere, anyplace, at any time which makes the judge blocking the President of the United States and outlaw. 

President Donald Trump is being urged to ignore the radical judge and investigate why Barack Obama was in the judges back yard 24 hours before the illegal court action took place. Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton airport meeting, it's happening again.  The judge and Obama were Harvard pal's, both radical, both dumber than dirt but maybe we can get school records now. 

Just last year, the Supreme Court implicitly said the opposite, when they said your right to association does not include a right to bring foreigners into the United States, in the Din decision,”

 “The prior Ninth Circuit decision effectively became moot when President Trump replace his old executive order with the new one, and these five judges said that prior decision was so bad that they needed to vacate the decision and should vacate the prior decision, even though that’s very rare under those circumstances. They referred to the obligation to correct the ‘manifest many, obvious, fundamental errors’ that went against all the precedent the guy overlooked or neglected in the prior panel decision.”

There was no basis for the prior Ninth Circuit decision. Well, this Hawaii decision goes further than any court had ever gone before. Hopefully, it will get reviewed and reversed, but in the interim, the country’s safety is put into jeopardy because one federal judge decided to anoint himself the one Supreme Court of the country

There’s no logic. If you start to apply logically all of the consequences of this judge’s ideas, it goes to places that would destroy the whole concept of borders, destroy the whole concept of nationhood sovereignty, destroy the presidential prerogative to destroy our borders. There’s just no limit to where this judge’s decision could go

“This problem is now right center with the way this judge issued his decision and particularly applying it nationally. He prevented every other federal judge, every other federal circuit, from weighing in on the decision because he unilaterally opposed it across the whole country – which both the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit have said you’re not supposed to do, in cases just like this,”

Trump Travel Ban Blocked by Another Obama Radical - Muslim Islamic Radicals - CNN MSNBC ABC CBS NEW YORK TIMES - Like epilepsy, the Islamic Muslim Jihadists lives and dies within short but dramatic fits and your family can be easily murdered during just one epileptic jihadist fit of rage against the Christian world.

All persons non-U.S. Citizens entering the United States, must, by law, be issued a VISA to visit, work or stay within the United States.  It is far better to decide if a VISA should be granted far away in their home countries.  

Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen

Administration lawyers said the constitution, the law and the Supreme Court on their side. For example, the law, at 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (f) says:

(f) Suspension of Entry or Imposition of Restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

The Supreme Court has accepted and validated this “plenary power” of the elected president. For example, the court declared in its 1950 judgment, titled Knauff v. Shaughnessy, that:

It is not within the province of any court, unless expressly authorized by [congressional] law, to review the determination of the political branch of Government to exclude a given alien.

This time Obama and his associates’ objective is to stop Trump’s domestic and foreign policy agendas on virtually all fronts – immigration reform, border security, the roll back of the controversial Obamacare system and more.  According to some accounts, Obama and his associates may be seeking no less than Trump’s impeachment.

The strategies for disruption seem to include everything from nonprofit front-group activism and the filing of legal motions to support for protest movements targeting Trump and top administration officials.

This as Trump works to secure America’s porous borders, fix the faltering economy, replace Obama’s largely failed healthcare law, combat the scourge of radical Islamic terrorism, contend with the threat of Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran, and address the issue of illegal immigration that was put on steroids during Obama’s two terms in office.

The latest sign of Obama’s fingerprints on Trump disruption plots comes from reports on Monday that former Obama administration staffers have formed a group to closely monitor the Trump administration.

FoxNews.com reported:

Known as American Oversight, the group will search for anything that seems amiss, whether it touches on ethics or fraud, among other potential problems, the group’s executive director, Austin Evers, told Fox News.

“We are conducting oversight because Congress won’t,” said Evers, who was a State Department lawyer in the Obama administration. “We are using tools available to American citizens to investigate instances of fraud, corruption, violation of ethics rules, you name it. If there’s something that Congress should be investigating, we will be.”

Earlier this month, the Daily Mail reported that Obama’s top adviser, Valerie Jarrett, has moved into Obama’s multi-million dollar rental home in the nation’s capital. The newspaper claimed Obama is turning his home “into the nerve center of the mounting insurgency against” Trump.

“Obama’s goal, according to a close family friend, is to oust Trump from the presidency either by forcing his resignation or through his impeachment,” reported the Daily Mail.

Evidence of Obama’s close associations with efforts to oppose Trump emerged two weeks ago when a group of former top lawyers for the Obama administration formed their own organization aimed at utilizing legal advocacy methods to target Trump’s policies.

That organization is calling itself United to Protect Democracy, drawing on the theme of Obama’s farewell speech last month.

The legal activist group is already partnered with an organization heavily financed by billionaire George Soros and is led by a former Obama lawyer who previously worked at a Soros-financed global activist outfit, this reporter documented.

Then there is also evidence of Obama-connected support for protests targeting Trump.

Last month, it was reported that Organizing for Action, the activist group that emerged from Obama’s first presidential campaign, has partnered with the newly-formed Indivisible Project for “online trainings” on how to protest Trump’s agenda. One week earlier, Breitbart News extensively reported that Indivisible leaders are openly associated with groups financed by billionaire George Soros.

Organizing for Action (OFA) is a so-called community organizing project that sprung from Obama’s 2012 campaign organization, Organizing for America, becoming a nonprofit described by the Washington Post as “advocat[ing] for the president’s policies.”

Last month, NBC News reported on OFA’s new actions and its partnership with Indivisible:

OFA has hired 14 field organizers in states home to key senators as part of its campaign to defend Obama’s signature healthcare law. To run that campaign, the group hired Saumya Narechania – the former national field director at Enroll America, which worked to sign people up for Obamacare – and a deputy campaign manager. …

OFA says more than 1,800 people have applied to its Spring Community Engagement Fellowship, a six-week training program, two-thirds of whom have not previously been involved with OFA.

And the group has teamed up with Indivisible, a buzzy newcomer to the progressive movement, to offer organizing training that began Thursday night with a video conference. A combined 25,000 people have registered to participate in those trainings, OFA said.

Writing at the New York Post, researcher and reporter Paul Sperry charged that Obama “is intimately involved in OFA operations and even tweets from the group’s account. In fact, he gave marching orders to OFA foot soldiers following Trump’s upset victory.”

Sperry was referring to comments Obama reportedly made in a November conference call with so-called grassroots supporters, telling them “Now is the time for some organizing.”

Obama hinted he will return to community organizing, stating: “I promise you that next year Michelle and I are going to be right there with you, and the clouds are going to start parting and the sun is going to come back out, and we’re going to be busy, involved in the amazing stuff that we’ve been doing all these years before.”

Perry further reported on OFA:

In what’s shaping up to be a highly unusual post-presidency, Obama isn’t just staying behind in Washington. He’s working behind the scenes to set up what will effectively be a shadow government to not only protect his threatened legacy, but to sabotage the incoming administration and its popular “America First” agenda.

He’s doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action. Normally you’d expect an organization set up to support a politician and his agenda to close up shop after that candidate leaves office, but not Obama’s OFA. Rather, it’s gearing up for battle, with a growing war chest and more than 250 offices across the country.

Meanwhile, Politico recently profiled the OFA-affiliated Indivisible, reporting the group has been aided by MoveOn.org and the ACLU.

The associations between the OFA-affiliated Indivisible and the Soros-financed MoveOn.org and ACLU may be telling since the latter two groups have been central to recent efforts to stop Trump.

Two weeks ago, within hours of reports surfacing that Attorney General Jeff Sessions held two conversations with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. while he was Alabama’s senator and served on the Armed Services Committee, MoveOn.org was already outside the U.S. Department of Justice building calling for Sessions’ resignation.

Sessions maintains that the conversations did not concern the 2016 presidential campaign.  He served as an informal adviser to Trump during the presidential race.

MoveOn.org and Indivisible are also planning what the groups claim will be a massive anti-Trump Tax March in Washington and at least 60 other locations on April 15.

Meanwhile, lawyers from the ACLU and other groups financed by Soros were signatories to a lawsuit filed to block Trump’s original refugee order. In response to the lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly issued an emergency order that temporarily blocked U.S. authorities from deporting travelers from the nations listed in Trump’s executive order.

Obama’s newfound activism seems to bring him back to his early days in the 1980s as an Alinsky-inspired community organizer working in the South Side of Chicago.

As a reporter at WND.com, this journalist previously extensively documented Obama’s ties to Alinsky ideology.

Here are a few samples:

The executive director of an activist organization that taught Alinsky’s tactics of direct action, confrontation and intimidation was part of the team that developed volunteers for President Obama’s 2008 campaign.

Jackie Kendall, executive director of the Midwest Academy, was on the team that developed Camp Obama, a two-to-four day intensive course run in conjunction with Obama’s campaign. It trained volunteers to become activists to help Obama win the presidential election.

WND also reported the Woods Fund, a nonprofit for which Obama served as a paid board director from 1999 to December 2002, provided capital to the Midwest Academy.

Obama sat on the Woods Fund board alongside William Ayers, founder of the Weather Underground domestic terrorist organization.

Also, in 1998, Obama participated in a panel discussion praising Alinsky alongside Midwest Academy’s founder Heather Booth, an organizer and dedicated disciple of Alinsky.

The panel discussion following the opening performance in Chicago of the play “The Love Song of Saul Alinsky,” a work described by the Chicago Sun-Times as “bringing to life one of America’s greatest community organizers.”

Obama participated in the discussion alongside other Alinskyites, including Booth, political analyst Aaron Freeman, Don Turner of the Chicago Federation of Labor and Northwestern University history professor Charles Paine.

Perhaps tellingly, Alinsky’s son, L. David Alinsky, praised Obama in August 2008 for his showing at the Democratic National Convention, which had the “elements of the perfectly organized event, Saul Alinsky style,” according to the son.

David Alinsky wrote:

Barack Obama’s training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.

I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.

David Horowitz, founder of the David Horowitz Freedom Center and a former 1960’s radical, considers Alinsky to be the “communist/Marxist fellow-traveler who helped establish the dual political tactics of confrontation and infiltration that characterized the 1960s and have remained central to all subsequent revolutionary movements in the United States.”

If you consider a U.S. VISA simply a license to stay for a while or maybe stay forever you can quickly understand the travel ban that President Trump is trying his best to put in place.  Every applicant must be vetted or in other words researched to the point that U.S. authorities can determine if the foreign applicant should be allowed in for a visit, work or stay. Because the killers are brown Muslims the judge tries to shut down the American people, so that must mean if the Islamic killers were white the Trump executive order would be o.k., sounds like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are in the White House. I'm sure CNN MSNBC ABC CBS and the New York Times can work this all out playing politics, skipping the real news. 

Before the VISA License is issued every person must past certain tests and the current test around the world; do they believe in the murdering of Infidels - American Citizens.  It matters little if they do it under the murderous Muslim Koran or a Christian Bible, so the judge, is completely confused. 

Muslim Islamic Radicals has an insanity that can be traced back in their history but the problem is that there is no history to research.  The seven Muslim countries have been overtaken by Islamic Muslim Radicals, so therefore you cannot trust anything they say or do.  It seems that a judge has once again blocked the safety of the legal American citizen and refused to allow President Trump to be the President of the United States, taking his power away.

This inspection or background check is required and at this point it truly cannot be done as records, personal histories and Jihadist leanings are hidden from Americans.

Like epilepsy, the Islamic Muslim Jihadists lives and dies within short but dramatic fits and your family can be easily murdered during just one epileptic jihadist fit of rage against the Christian world. 

Without a true examination and investigation of every foreigner wanting to enter the United States you are importing your own murderer, and in some cases you will feed, house, cloth and keep them in good health while they wait and ponder how to kill you, your wife, your children and even your dog or cat. 

You know that insanity runs through the DNC Democratic Party which was fostered by radical American Jihadist Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and whorehouse Harry Reid with his pal George Soros.

The disgraced X - President Barack Obama is quickly working through his Organizing for Action to do anything to stop the American people, by stopping President Trump, to be a government for and by the people.

.

FBI Director Blind Sided by Presidential Pardon for Hillary Rodham Clinton - Expect an immediate presidential pardon for Hillary Clinton Email Top Secret Scandal Computer Server

The extraordinary truth about the Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama Top Secret Email Scandal is getting complicated while you slept.  You have noticed that Hillary Clinton will not answer any questions about her private, illegal and secret underground computer servers holding top secret U.S. Government documents by the thousands, there is a reason.  

The FBI and DOJ is in the process and drafting documents to pardon Hillary Rodham Clinton for her illegal activity.  Barack Obama plans the pardon and shield Hillary Clinton from federal prison time with a presidential pardon.

Hungry for justice the American People will not stand for this injustice and the appetite for jail time looms as Hillary Rodham Clinton grows darker by the day.  Hillary Clinton has been pleading her case behind closed doors at the White House inside the Oval office and has pleaded for mercy from Barack Obama through many lawyers as Hillary Clinton operatives offer up promises for the soon to be retired president.

Expect an immediate presidential pardon for Hillary Clinton.

.

Hillary Clinton settles for Home Time vs. Prison Time in connection to SAP Top Secret Documents -

Supreme Court Battle - Hillary Clinton says we're a nation of laws and Barack Obama should consider and nominate a Scalia Supreme Court Justice right away, it' the law.  Hillary Clinton knows little about the law as she is lawless and unblinkingly she lies to everybody listening in South Carolina. 

Imagine, the lawlessness of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and laugh just a little as Hillary Clinton is telling people with her full throat smoky raspy voice

 "my friends we are a nation of laws" 

which is a remarkable statement from the criminal Hillary Clinton while the FBI has her under criminal investigation for mishandling SAP Documents and Top Secrets of the United States which is a felony and maybe even Treason against the United States. 

The mutations of the laws of the land is beyond any understanding as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton sway back and forth from street gangsters to political thugs.  The history of this duo is clear, they are criminals and liars but they preach entirely something different when they want something, just like a drug invested teenager that wants to borrow the car.  You just say no.

Obama and Clinton have diminished America.

What mechanism puts Hillary Clinton in prison? Death Dealing Emails - by the thousands were found on Hillary Clinton's secret underground computer email hard drive

Death Dealing Emails - by the thousands were found on Hillary Clinton's secret underground computer email hard drive and it's self evident that Hillary Clinton, is guilty for various federal criminal violations and belongs in jail.  

The DNC controlled Hillary Clinton refuses to answer any questions about the SAP Top Secret Documents found on her personal computer hard drive so the death dealing emails will never find themselves printed in the newspaper.  The FBI and Start Department people reviewing the breach in security cannot even read the documents and their security clearance is too little too late. 

Without the human hands of Huma Abedin or Cheryl Mills how did Hillary Clinton avoid the entire national security devices right under Barack Obama's nose? 

The computer hard drive marvel is giving up Hillary Clinton's secrets but the White House, the DOJ Department of Justice and the FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation has painted Clinton into a corner, now what.

The screen of secrecy set up by the Federal Government to protect the top secrets of our nation was destroyed by Hillary Clinton when she set up her own server.  She then ordered operatives to cut and paste SAP Top Secret Documents and send them to and from her private and secret computer email server.  

In general, flying bombs would do less damage.  Most like China, Russia, Iran and North Korea has been reading the SAP documents for years.  These top secret messages were sent to Hillary Clinton from and to a secure server and then Clinton employees would copy and paste the text into another computer email server and hit the send button.  It's like leaving the barn door open all the time.  Once the original email, containing top secrets, reached the government server it took a lot of time and money to copy and past and one thing for sure, it took human hands.  Who are they?

Some say with direct knowledge and supervision Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin were in charge as the perfect stream of top secrets were simply pushed to the Clinton server without any protection.  Why would you do that?

Was the Clinton server left open?

Did people pay to hack the server?

Where did all the Clinton Foundation money come from and for what?

The Clinton's direct the course of top secret information.

There is no doubt, just doubts about FBI Comey and DOJ Lynch.

What mechanism puts Hillary Clinton in prison?

Hillary Clinton is Expected to Stumble into Federal Prison - Biden To Carry the DNC Torch but the Flame is gone as Bill Clinton vibrates across the campaign trail

Bill Clinton is vibrating around the campaign trail but something has gone very wrong.  The elegant performances by Bill Clinton are gone, his squeaky voice does not match his personality or his dirty history concerning rape and sexual abuse charges.  People now look at Bill Clinton as a rapist always robbing girls of their pride and rubbing their painted faces in shame.  What's sad is the Hillary Clinton knows everything and the Clinton squabbling's inside the Clinton mansion are endless as Hillary realizes her time has passed.  She wanted her clanging lies to stay hidden but the internet has changed everything, the spilling of her lies are now constant and circle the world at the speed of light.

Hillary has no female charm, her record is very poor but it's the lying and cheating and her cheating rapist husband that buried her in the truth.  She is hiring trial lawyers and she remains anxious and afraid.  The bony Bill Clinton cannot save her, Trump is grappling for the real trophy as she tries to follow him he simply waves good bye. 

She was caught and her stream of lies won't sell anymore as they spill across the American nation.  She smells like spoiled milk as voters begin to laugh at her, the DNC hides her debates as the infuriated Hillary Clinton tries her best to hide from the FBI through lawyers and favors.

.

Driving Ms Hillary - Barack Obama Gets Even - When Hillary Clinton is cornered by the FBI and the NSA you can except the threshold into violence Obama Goes Biden - Donald Trump Promises A New World of American Prosperity

When Hillary Clinton is cornered by the FBI and the NSA you can except the threshold into violence to be crossed as her madness will come to surface.  Hillary Clinton has been exposed now and the shocking truth about the Clinton Gang will fill you full of fear and pity all at the same time.  Top Secret and Confidential emails are surfacing now, she's busted and afraid.  When Hillary closes the doors of her mansion, all hell breaks loose and heads are rolling including Bill Clinton's.

The Clinton's have survived but they have lost all the admiration of the voters, even the Democratic Socialists formed under Barack Obama want her tossed away like the trash.

Hillary Clinton is free at the moment, which is a terrible injustice to the American people as she sold out the country for cash and power.  The tyrant Barack Obama will not be replaced by another tyrant Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The DNC Democratic Socialist Party of Barack Obama is frantic and hysterical as Hillary Clinton  is now bent and gripping her ankles.  You can hear and see the panic in Hillary's face and listen to her breathing change when she's lying to reporters.  Her talking points only works inside her castle but now the people know the truth.

Every time Donald Trump talks Hillary Clinton flinches in pain as he strokes the passions of honest American voters.  Hillary Clinton will be charged in a federal court and will have to face trial for her criminal activities.

She's trying to look calm and collected but her cold and hostile face reveals the truth about Hillary Clinton and the fate of the Democratic Socialist Party now being destroyed by Donald Trump.

Behind closed doors, Hillary Clinton is evil.

.

IRS Scandal Lois Lerner - Barack Obama Liar in Chief - Destruction Hillary Clinton Emails & Secret Server - The New York Times - Criminal Investigations - Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation - RICO Corruption Investigation Conspiracy Barack Obama Hillary Clinton Susan Rice Iran Nuclear Deal John Kerry

 

IRS Docs Show How the Renegade Tax Agency Used Donor Lists To Steer Audits Judicial Watch has released more blockbuster documents from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that confirm that the IRS used donor lists of tax-exempt organizations to target those donors for audits.  The documents also show that IRS officials specifically highlighted how the U.S. Chamber of Commerce may come under "high scrutiny" from the IRS.  We forced these records out through a Freedom of Information lawsuit seeking documents about the selection of individuals and organizations for audits, based application information and donor lists submitted by Tea Party and other 501(c)(4) tax-exempt organizations. In a letter dated September 28, 2010, then-Democrat Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) informs then-IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman: "I request that you and your agency survey major 501(c)(4), (c)(5) and (c)(6) organizations ..."  In reply, in a letter dated February 17, 2011, Shulman writes: "In the work plan of the Exempt Organizations Division, we announced that beginning in FY2011, we are increasing our focus on section 501(c)(4), (5) and (6) organizations." Sure enough, in 2010, after receiving Baucus' letter, the IRS considered the issue of auditing donors to 501(c)(4) organizations, alleging that a 35 percent gift tax would be due on donations in excess of $13,000.  The documents show that the IRS wanted to cross-check donor lists from 501(c)(4) organizations against gift tax filings and commence audits against taxpayers based on this information. A gift tax on contributions to 501(c)(4)s was considered by most to be a dead letter since the IRS had never enforced the rule after the Supreme Court ruled that such taxes violated the First Amendment.  The documents show that the IRS had not enforced the gift tax since 1982. But then, in February 2011, at least five donors of an unnamed organization were audited. The documents show that Crossroads GPS, associated with Republican Karl Rove, was specifically referenced by IRS officials in the context of applying the gift tax. On April 20, IRS attorney Lorraine Gardner emails a 501(c)(4) donor list to former Branch Chief in the IRS' Office of the Chief Counsel James Hogan. Later, this information is apparently shared with IRS Estate Gift and Policy Manager Lisa Piehl while Gardner seeks "information about any of the donors." One of the most disturbing bits of information pulled from the documents concerns the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which sometimes works to support the free-enterprise system in the face of heavy-handed regulatory policies. Emails to and from Lorraine Gardner point to a bias against the Chamber.  An IRS official (whose name is redacted) emails Gardner on May 13, 2011, a leftist blog post responding to the IRS targeting of political and other activities of 501(c)(4), (5) and (6) organizations:  "The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a 501(c)(6) organization and may find itself under high scrutiny.  One can only hope." The subject line of the email highlights this anti-Chamber of Commerce comment:  "we are making headlines notice the end regarding 501(c)(6) applicability enjoy."  This critical comment is forwarded to other IRS officials and shows up attached to another Gardner IRS email chain with the subject line "re: 501(c)(4)" that discusses a pending decision about a tax-exempt entity. In early May, once the media began reporting on the IRS audits of donors, IRS officials reacted quickly.  One official acknowledges the issue "is a biggy" when a reporter from The New York Times contacts the IRS on May 9. On May 13, 2011, former IRS Director of Legislative Affairs Floyd Williams discusses compliance with "interest" from Capitol Hill: "Not surprisingly, interest on the hill is picking up on this issue ... with Majority Leader Reid's office, has suggested the possibility of a briefing for the Senate Finance Committee staff on general issues related to section 501(c)(4) organizations. I think we should do it as interest is likely to grow as we get closer to elections." Later that day, then-Director of the Exempt Organizations Lois Lerner weighs in with an email that confirms that she supported the gift tax audits.  Lerner acknowledges that "the courts have said specifically that contributions to 527 political organizations are not subject to the gift tax-nothing that I'm aware of that about contributions to organizations that are not political organizations." Section 501(c)(4) organizations are not "political organizations."  [Emphasis in original] Lerner's involvement and support for the new gift tax contradicts the IRS statement to the media at the time that audits were not part of a "broader effort looking at donations 501(c)(4)'s."  In July 2011, the IRS retreated after a public uproar and soon-to-be Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller directed that "examination resources should not be expended on this issue" and that all audits of taxpayers "relating to the application of gift taxes" to 501(c)(4) organizations "should be closed." By the way, we had filed a separate lawsuit for records about targeting of individuals for audit in November 2013.  In that litigation, the IRS had refused to search any email systems, including Lerner's records.  A federal court ruled the IRS' search was sufficient and dismissed the lawsuit earlier this month.  So it took another lawsuit to get this new info from the IRS! These documents that we had to force out of the IRS prove that the agency used donor lists to audit supporters of organizations engaged in First Amendment-protected lawful political speech.  And the snarky comments about the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the obsession with Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS show that the IRS was targeting critics of the Obama administration.  President Obama continues to lie about his IRS scandal.  He told a comedian the other day that "there was not some big conspiracy there."  Obama also said, "Congress had passed a crummy law that didn't give people guidance in terms of what it was they were trying to do.  They did it poorly and stupidly." How does he know all this?  The Department of Justice and the FBI supposedly are still conducting a criminal investigation.  The Treasury for Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report exposing the scandal made no mention of "crummy laws" passed by Congress.  Its audit revealed the IRS had used "inappropriate criteria" to identify potential political cases.  "Early in Calendar Year 2010," TIGTA wrote, "the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to identify organizations applying for tax-exempt status to (e.g., lists of past and future donors)."  The illegal IRS reviews continued for more than 18 months and, TIGTA reported, "delayed processing of targeted groups' applications preparing for the 2012 presidential election."  And these documents tell the truth - his IRS hated conservatives and was willing to illegally tax and audit citizens to shut down opposition to Barack Obama's policies and reelection. Obama's IRS falsehood the other day contained an admission that few picked up on.  He said, "You don't want all this money pouring through non-for-profits but you also want to make sure that everybody is getting treated fairly."  Who doesn't "want all this money pouring through non-for-profits"?  Barack Obama.  There is no law prohibiting money "flowing through non-profits."  But he didn't like the idea of this money being used against his reelection or his policies.  So his IRS targeted these groups and their donors for lawless oppression. This president and his administration are out of control.    That's why your JW is working on several fronts where the growing scandal over IRS audits is concerned.  In September 2014, another Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit forced the release of documents detailing that the IRS sought, obtained and maintained the names of donors to Tea Party and other conservative groups.  IRS officials acknowledged in these documents that "such information was not needed." The documents also show that the donor names were being used for a "secret research project." Let's review some of the facts Obama chose to ignore. The House Ways and Means Committee announced at a May 7, 2014, hearing that, after scores of conservative groups provided donor information "to the IRS, nearly one in ten donors were subject to audit."  In 2011, as many as five donors to the conservative 501(c)(4) organization Freedom's Watch were audited, according to the Wall Street Journal. Bradley Blakeman, Freedom's Watch's former president, also alleges he was "personally targeted" by the IRS. There's more. In February 2014, then-Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) detailed improper IRS targeting of existing conservative groups: Additionally, we now know that the IRS targeted not only right-leaning applicants, but also right-leaning groups that were already operating as 501(c)(4)s.  At Washington, DC's direction, dozens of groups operating as 501(c)(4)s were flagged for IRS surveillance, including monitoring of the groups' activities, websites and any other publicly available information.  Of these groups, 83 percent were right-leaning.  And of the groups the IRS selected for audit, 100 percent were right-leaning. Maybe President Obama can fool a comedian about the IRS scandal, but he isn't fooling Judicial Watch as we battle his Justice Department and IRS lawyers successfully in court to hold him accountable for his worse-than-Nixon abuse of the IRS. Federal Judge Says State Department Must "Answer For" Destruction of Clinton Emails There is a legal reckoning coming for Hillary Clinton's notorious email practices and policies. There is too much Judicial Watch legal pressure and too many federal court judges for the Obama administration and the Clinton gang forever to avoid the legal consequences of their email shenanigans.  For instance, we are pleased to report that a federal judge has said that the State Department will "have to answer for" any destruction of Hillary Clinton's email records. U. S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras made the statement at a July 9, 2015, status conference concerning a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act lawsuit for records about the State Department's vetting of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's potential conflicts of interest.  The transcript of the July 9 court hearing is available here. Recall that it was only four months ago, on March 2, 2015, that The New York Times reported then-Secretary Clinton used at least one non-"state.gov" email account to conduct official government business during her entire tenure as the secretary of state.  It also was reported that Secretary Clinton stored these records on a non-U.S. government server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. There are nearly 20 federal lawsuits that touch on Mrs. Clinton and her staff's use of secret email accounts to conduct official government business. In our various FOIA lawsuits, our lawyers have informed attorneys for the Obama administration that Hillary Clinton's account and any other secret accounts used by State employees should be secured, recovered and searched. During this particular court hearing, Judicial Watch attorney Chris Fedeli raised the concerns JW had about the preservation of records, especially email records that were not part of the 55,000 records Clinton turned over to the State Department last year.  Apparently, Fedeli struck the right note. In response, Judge Contreras said he was also "concerned" about the preservation of these records: If documents are destroyed between now and August 17, the government will have to answer for that, and, you know, if they don't want to do anything out of the ordinary to preserve between now and then, they can make that choice. I will allow them to make that choice, but they will answer for it, if something happens. After a Justice Department lawyer attempted to assure him that the administration was asking for government records from former State Department employees, Judge Contreras questioned the State Department's position that it had no legal obligation to take additional steps to obtain other government records in the custody of Mrs. Clinton and other former officials who used her special email system: [I]t is to state the obvious that this is not an ordinary case, and everyone should be working to make sure that whatever documents exist today remain in existence. Judge Contreras also voiced concerns regarding the State Department's refusal to provide any information about the Clinton email issue: But I am a little bit mystified that the government is not more forthcoming in just answering questions that will help this case proceed on a systematic basis, and on a basis that will allow everyone to get the answers that will eventually help resolve these cases... This one court hearing shows that Hillary Clinton and her co-conspirators in the State Department will have to account for each and every email on Hillary Clinton's notorious email system. That's encouraging. It's become clear now to the public at large that Hillary Clinton has been telling fairy tales about the missing emails that are beginning to unravel. "Nothing Mrs. Clinton has said so far on the subject is correct," The Wall Street Journal's Kimberly Strassel has charitably observed.  Again, the reckoning is coming. The court also seemed to reject the Obama administration's contention that responding to Judicial Watch's lawsuit in a timely way would derail its compliance with Judge Contreras' order in another lawsuit (Leopold v. U.S. Department of State, (15-00123)) requiring that the 55,000 pages of Clinton email records be searched and produced under FOIA by January 2016: My order in Leopold was based on numbers and percentages. To the extent that documents from that universe are produced in this case, they qualify for the numbers in Leopold, don't they? So that they're not mutually exclusive from a resource standpoint, are they? The judge then said his "inclination is to have a search done of the Clinton e-mail database that's digitized and searchable for this relatively narrow, in my view, relatively narrow request." A separate and ongoing Judicial Watch lawsuit forced the disclosure last year of documents that provided a road map for over 200 conflict-of-interest rulings that led to $48 million for the Clinton Foundation and other Clinton-connected entities during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state. Previously disclosed documents in this lawsuit, for example, raise questions about funds Clinton accepted from entities linked to Saudi Arabia, China and Iran, among others.  Judicial Watch and The Washington Examiner partnered in the first story to break the Clinton conflicts scandal: "State Department approved 215 Bill Clinton speeches, controversial consulting deal, worth $48m; Hillary Clinton's Chief of Staff copied on all decisions." You can see why the State Department and the Clinton operation have been trying to play a rope-a-dope obstruction game with Judicial Watch, courts and Congress for these emails. But it won't work. As I write this, news is breaking that Hillary Clinton is the subject of a criminal referral to the Justice Department by two separate inspectors general for an investigation into her potentially criminal mishandling of hundreds of pages of classified information on her email system.  The New York Times broke the story (and may have edited it at the behest of the Clinton campaign), but there is no doubt that there is serious criminal liability for Hillary Clinton.  If the Justice Department, the State Department, or the FBI were all above-board, there would have been law enforcement activity many months ago.  Now we know that the State Department resisted cooperating with the IG investigations.  And we can't trust the Obama Justice Department.  The New York Times tells us that it helping Hillary Clinton's PR effort, too: On Thursday night and again Friday morning, the Justice Department referred to the matter as a "criminal referral" but later on Friday dropped the word "criminal." At the Obama Justice Department, politics always comes first, so it is imperative that no less than a special counsel be appointed to investigate this matter.  Under Justice Department regulations: The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and-(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a  United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and (b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public  interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter." This will be a major ethical test for new Attorney General Loretta Lynch.  In the meantime, we will continue our pursuit for information and accountability in the courts.  Judicial Watch Client McCann Testifies To Congress on Deadly Sanctuary Policies   If you'd like to see how irrelevant and out of touch the typical D.C. debate about "amnesty" for illegal aliens can be, I suggest you watch this video of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this week. American citizens told of loved ones who were murdered by illegal aliens thanks to lawless state and national "sanctuary policies."  I attended that hearing in person, so I can tell you it that it will make you both upset and angry.  Judicial Watch was at the hearing because it included the testimony of our client Brian McCann, who did his part earlier to jolt the political class back to reality.  McCann is a lifelong resident of Chicago. We are representing him in his lawsuit against Cook County Sheriff Thomas J. Dart.  The suit challenges the sheriff's refusal to cooperate with federal immigration officials or honor immigration detainers issued by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for criminal aliens. McCann's written testimony, which is available in full here, brings home the enormous human tragedy attached to illegal immigration and the dangers of open, unsecured borders.  Mr. McCann told the committee members about how his brother, William "Denny" McCann, was run over and killed in June 2011 by an unlawfully present criminal alien who had just completed a two-year term of probation for a 2009 DUI conviction.  The alien, Saul Chavez, was charged with felony aggravated driving under the influence, but was released by Dart from a Cook County jail in November 2011 despite an ICE immigration detainer.  At the time, ICE issued detainers when it learned that criminal aliens are being held by state or local law enforcement officials.  The detainers required the criminal aliens be held for an additional 48 hours to enable ICE to take custody of them before they are released. At the time, Cook County jails had released as many as 1,000 criminal aliens sought by ICE in the previous 18 months.  We continue this legal fight. Just last month we filed a petition for review with the Illinois Supreme Court. Denny McCann's killer is believed to have fled to Mexico.  As Brian McCann recounted to the Senate committee: Denny was crossing Kedzie Avenue on a marked crosswalk four years ago and was violently struck by a drunk driver who dragged Denny under his car for a block in an attempt to flee before Denny died. The family was notified by the Chicago Police and the killer was placed into custody and charged with aggravated DUI causing death. Two days later ICE issued a detainer because the young man was an illegal alien with a prior felony. The family was assured by the Cook County prosecutor that the defendant would not be allowed to post bail and be released. Three months later the Cook County Board passed the ordinance that effectively requires the sheriff to ignore detainers. During the intervening weeks after Denny's violent death, Cook County President Toni Preckwinkle and former mayoral candidate and Commissioner Jesus Garcia pushed for the ordinance and rammed it through on September 7, 2011. Two months later the killer made bail and absconded to Mexico. As if Denny McCann's death was not painful enough for the family, they also had to endure learning that if our government had simply enforced the law, the illegal alien who killed his brother would not be running loose.  Here is how Mr. McCann tells it: Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this whole ordeal was that we also learned that this illegal alien was prosecuted for another felony two years earlier and ICE was never notified then. He was removed from probation February 2011 and four months later killed Denny. In short, Denny would be alive today and enjoying the birth of a new granddaughter born two weeks ago if the Cook County criminal justice system that included the county board did its job. I received confirmation that he is indeed in Mexico from the FBI and is currently driving a truck. I had to prevail on my congressman to get the FBI to cooperate with my request for information and action. I have not heard from the Bureau in over six months. Of course, the Obama administration has run away from any serious enforcement of our immigration laws and no longer routinely issues detainers requiring that local police hold illegal alien criminals: Because ICE no longer routinely issues detainers we are no longer challenging [Sherriff Thomas] Dart's refusal to honor them.  However, we continue to challenge the Sheriff's policy of prohibiting and restricting communications and the exchanging of information with ICE officials about a person's citizenship or immigration status. Now under PEP (Priority Enforcement Program) even if ICE requests that Cook County notify them of the impending release of a deportable criminal alien, Cook County would not comply. I find this unacceptable and will fight this policy in the courts until the end. I remain very concerned that the current immigration enforcement policies seem to encourage jurisdictions like Cook County and San Francisco to continue their noncooperation policies. The other victims who testified that day also told harrowing stories and demanded action. President Obama's response was to threaten to veto any legislation that would withhold federal monies from states or localities that continued sanctuary policies that put the public safety at risk. And a report out of The New York Times confirmed what we've been highlight for years - that Obama has stopped deporting almost every illegal alien.  The story confirms as many as 87 percent of illegals won't be subject to deportation under Obama's unlawful sanctuary/amnesty policies. As are doing for fine Americans like Brian McCann, Judicial Watch will continue to investigate, litigate and educate. We promise to continue to expose this assault on the rule of law, the public safety, and our nation's sovereignty.