look at Barack Obama’s life story, his actions, his closest
alliances, his long-term objectives, and his words, shows that he has long
been, quite demonstrably, a genuine socialist. In the final analysis, Americans
are, and indeed should be, free to vote for a socialist president if that is
what they want. But if they choose that road, they ought to at least be aware
that that is in fact what they are doing—rather than be misled into thinking
they are merely supporting a “liberal,” a “progressive,” or a big-hearted
advocate of “social justice.” They are supporting a man who is, beyond any
shadow of a doubt, a lifelong, committed socialist:
Frank Marshall Davis
The early groundwork for Obama’s socialist worldview was laid
during his teen years, when he was mentored by the writer/poet Frank Marshall
Davis, a longtime member of the Communist Party and the subject of a 601-page
FBI file.” The co-founder of a Communist-controlled newspaper that consistently
echoed the Soviet party line, Davis had previously been involved with the
American Peace Mobilization, described by Congress as not only “one of the most
notorious and blatantly communist fronts ever organized in this country,” but
also “one of the most seditious organizations which ever operated in the United
States.” When Obama in 1979 headed off to Occidental College in California,
Davis cautioned him not to “start believing what they tell you about equal
opportunity and the American way and all that sh–.”
Obama's Socialism During His College Years
In his memoir, Dreams from My Father, Obama recounts that he
chose his friends “carefully” at Occidental, so as “to avoid being mistaken for
a sellout.” Among those friends were all manner of radicals, including “the
more politically active black students,” “the Chicanos,” “the Marxist
Professors and the structural feminists.” Further, Obama writes that he and his
similarly “alienated” college friends regularly discussed such topics as
“neocolonialism, Franz Fanon [the socialist revolutionary], Eurocentrism, and
patriarchy.”
David Remnick’s highly sympathetic biography of Obama—The
Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama—confirms that the future president
and many of his closest friends at Occidental were unquestionably socialists.
John C. Drew, an Occidental College graduate who knew Obama
personally in the early 1980s, reports that the young Obama of that period was
“already an ardent socialist Marxist revolutionary”; was highly “passionate”
about “Marxist theory”; embraced an “uncompromising, Marxist socialist
ideology”; harbored a “sincere commitment to Marxist revolutionary thought”;
and was, in the final analysis, a “pure Marxist socialist” who “sincerely
believed a Marxist socialist revolution was coming.”
Obama Embraces “Incremental” Socialism
In the early 1980s, something profoundly important happened to
Barack Obama. He was drawn into the powerful orbit of a strand of socialism
that had resolved, as the revolutionary communist Van Jones would later put it,
“to forgo the cheap satisfaction of the radical pose for the deep satisfaction
of radical ends.” American socialists of that period, pained by the recent
ascendancy of a conservative and popular presidential administration (Reagan),
understood that no anti-capitalist revolution was going to take place in the
United States anytime soon.
Consequently, many socialists in the U.S. put on a new face and
pursued a new approach. As Stanley Kurtz, author of Radical-in-Chief, explains,
these socialists no longer advocated an immediate government takeover of the
private economy. Their aim now was to gain influence through the work of
community organizers dedicated to gradually infiltrating every conceivable
American institution: schools and universities, churches, labor unions, the
banking industry, the media, and a major political party.
Toward that end, the renowned socialist Michael Harrington
established the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) to serve as a force that
would work within the existing American political system—specifically, within
the Democratic Party. Figuring that a move too far or too quick to the left
would alienate moderate Democrats, the DSA sought to push the party leftward in
a slow and gradual manner, on the theory that, over time, ever-increasing
numbers of Democrats would become comfortable with socialism and would espouse
it as their preferred ideology.
In Radical-in-Chief, Stanley Kurtz points out that this
incrementalism became the modus operandi of the “democratic socialists” who
embraced the ideals of Karl Marx but were convinced that a “peaceful” and
gradual path represented “the only route to socialism that makes sense in
America’s thoroughly democratic context.” They believed that “government
ownership of the means of production”—the standard definition of socialism—could
best be achieved by way of protracted evolution, not sudden revolution.
Kurtz explains that socialists, far from agreeing unanimously on
tactics and strategies, have always engaged in “never-ending factional
disputes” about whether they ought to “eschew capitalist-tainted politics and
foment revolution,” or instead “dive into America’s electoral system and try to
turn its political currents” toward “a piecemeal transition to a socialist
world.”
At this point in his life, the twenty-something Obama made a
calculated decision to embrace the DSA’s gradualist approach—under the
deceptive banners of “liberalism,” “progressivism,” and “social justice.”
By no means, however, did this approach represent a rejection of
Marx and his socialist doctrines. Kurtz notes that Marx himself, who “expected
to see capitalism overthrown by a violent socialist revolution,” was
nonetheless “willing to compromise his long-term goals in pursuit of short-term
gains, particularly when he thought this democratic maneuvering would position
the communist movement for more radical breakthroughs in the future”; that Marx
himself “recognized that not only his enemies, but even potential followers
could be put off by his most radical plans”; and that, “depending on context,
Marx [himself] withheld the full truth of who he was and what he hoped to
achieve.”
Obama Attends the Socialist Scholars Conferences
In the early 1980s, Obama transferred from Occidental College to
Columbia University in New York. During his time in the Big Apple, he attended
at least two Socialist Scholars Conferences, DSA-sponsored events that quickly
grew into the largest annual gatherings of socialists in all of North America.
It is particularly noteworthy that Obama attended the 1983 Socialist Scholars
Conference, which was promoted as a celebration to “honor” the 100th
anniversary of Karl Marx’s death.
Obama's Introduction to Community Organizing
Obama entered the work of community organizing in the spring of
1985, when he took a job with the New York branch of the U.S. Public Interest
Research Group (USPIRG), the brainchild of the famous anti-capitalist,
anti-corporate activist Ralph Nader. According to his PIRG supervisor, Eileen
Hershenov, Obama had already developed a solid grasp of the radical strategies
that underlay community organizing – specifically, how the Left used the
“community” umbrella to advance its radical agendas. Thus he was comfortable
discussing everything from the tactics of Saul Alinsky, the godfather of
community organizing, to the organizing strategies of socialist groups like the
(defunct) Students for a Democratic Society.
Obama's Community Organizing Is Funded By an Organization with
Marxist Ideals
In June 1985, Obama moved to Chicago and took a
community-organizing job with the Developing Communities Project, funded by the
Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD). Viewing capitalism as a system
steeped in injustice, CCHD states that “the causes of poverty are understood to
be an aspect of ‘social sin’ rooted in our social and economic structures and
institutions.” To address the problems allegedly spawned by capitalism, CCHD
promotes transformative institutional change in the form of “alternative
economic structures” that will “broaden the sharing of economic power.” The
Catholic magazine Crisis observes that “the way the CCHD educates others about
transformative change and empowerment” is very much “in line with the socialist
and Marxist ideals so prevalent in community organizing.”
Community Organizing As a Socialist Enterprise
What, exactly, is “community organizing”? Dr. Thomas Sowell, the
eminent Hoover Institution Fellow, offers this concise explanation: “For
‘community organizers’ … racial resentments are a stock in trade…. What [they]
organiz[e] are the resentments and paranoia within a community, directing those
feelings against other communities, from whom either benefits or revenge are to
be gotten, using whatever rhetoric or tactics will accomplish that purpose.”
The 2012 Obama campaign’s incessant emphasis on identity politics—seeking to
divide the American people along lines of race, ethnicity, class, and
gender—bears all the corrosive hallmarks of precisely the mindset that Dr.
Sowell describes.
Stanley Kurtz provides additional vital insights into the
striking parallels that exist between the world of community organizing and the
DSA’s gradualist approach toward socialism: “Community organizing is a largely
socialist profession. Particularly at the highest levels, America’s community
organizers have adopted a deliberately stealthy posture—hiding their socialism
behind a ‘populist’ front. These organizers strive to push America toward
socialism in unobtrusive, incremental steps, calling themselves ‘pragmatic
problem-solvers’ all the while.”
Obama's Ties to Saul Alinsky, Godfather of Community Organizing
It is highly significant that three of Obama’s mentors in
Chicago were trained at the Industrial Areas Foundation, established by the
famed godfather of community organizing, Saul Alinsky, who advocated mankind’s
“advance from the jungle of laissez-faire capitalism to a world worthy of the
name of human civilization … [to] a future where the means of production will
be owned by all of the people instead of just a comparative handful”—in other
words, socialism. In the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for
“revolution”—where the ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of
power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical
transformation of America’s social and economic structure. The goal is to
foment enough public discontent and moral confusion to spark social upheaval.
But Alinsky’s brand of revolution was not characterized by
dramatic, sweeping, overnight transformations of social institutions. As author
Richard Poe explains, “Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process.
The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and
political parties.” Promoting a strategy that was wholly consistent with the
DSA approach discussed above, Alinsky advised radical organizers and their
disciples to quietly, unobtrusively gain influence within the decision-making
ranks of these institutions, and to then introduce changes from those
platforms.
Obama himself went on to teach workshops on the Alinsky method
for several years.
In 1990, eighteen years after Alinsky’s death, an essay penned
by Obama was reprinted as a chapter in a book titled After Alinsky: Community
Organizing in Illinois.
In 1998 at the Terrapin Theater in Chicago, Obama attended a
performance of the play The Love Song of Saul Alinsky, which glorified the late
radical. Following that performance, Obama took the stage and participated in a
panel discussion about the show, along with several other socialists and
communists such as Quentin Young and Heather Booth.
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Saul Alinsky’s son David
wrote the following: “Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my
father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local
community organizing to affect the democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine
tribute to Saul Alinsky as we his approach 100th birthday.”
Obama and the Midwest Academy, a “Crypto-Socialist” Organization
As a young community organizer, Obama had close connections to
the Midwest Academy, a radical training ground for activists of his political
ilk. Probably the most influential community-organizing-related entity in
America at that time, the Midwest Academy worked closely with the DSA and
synthesized Saul Alinsky’s organizing techniques with the practical
considerations of electoral politics. Emphasizing “class consciousness” and
“movement history,” the Academy’s training programs exposed students to the
efforts and achievements of veteran activists from earlier decades. Recurring
“socialism sessions” encompassed everything from Marx and Engels through
Michael Harrington’s democratic socialism and the factional struggles of the
Students for a Democratic Society, a radical organization that aspired to
remake America’s government in a Marxist image.
Knowing that many Americans would be unreceptive to
straightforward, hard-left advocacy, the Midwest Academy in its formative years
was careful not to explicitly articulate its socialist ideals in its organizing
and training activities. The group’s inner circle was wholly committed to
building a socialist mass movement, but stealthily rather than overtly. As
Midwest Academy trainer Steve Max and the prominent socialist Harry Boyte
agreed in a private correspondence: “Every social proposal that we make must be
[deceptively] couched in terms of how it will strengthen capitalism.” This
strategy of hiding its own socialist agendas below the proverbial radar, earned
the Academy the designation “crypto-socialist organization” from Stanley Kurtz.
“Nearly every thread of Obama’s career runs directly or
indirectly through the Midwest Academy,” says Kurtz, and, as such, it
represents “the hidden key to Barack Obama’s political career.” Kurtz
elaborates: “Obama’s organizing mentors had ties to [the Midwest Academy];
Obama’s early funding was indirectly controlled by it; evidence strongly
suggests that Obama himself received training there; both Barack and Michelle
Obama ran a project called ‘Public Allies’ that was effectively an extension of
the Midwest Academy; Obama’s first run for public office was sponsored by
Academy veteran Alice Palmer; and Obama worked closely at two foundations for
years with yet another veteran organizer from the Midwest Academy, Ken Rolling.
Perhaps more important, Barack Obama’s approach to politics is clearly inspired
by that of the Midwest Academy.”
Obama's Socialist Pastor, Jeremiah Wright
Obama’s next major encounter with socialism took place within
the sanctuary of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ, pastored by the
Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Best known for his undiluted contempt for the United
States and its traditions, Wright has long been a proud prophet of black
liberation theology, a movement that seeks to foment Marxist revolutionary
fervor founded on racial solidarity, as opposed to the traditional Marxist
emphasis on class solidarity. According to black liberation theology, the New
Testament gospels can be properly understood only as calls for racial activism
and revolution aimed at overturning the existing, white-dominated, capitalist
order, and installing, in its stead, a socialist utopia wherein blacks will
unseat their white “oppressors” and become liberated from their
deprivations—material and spiritual alike.
Beginning in the late 1980s, Obama spent fully 20 years
attending Wright’s church, which openly promoted a “10-point vision” calling
for “economic parity” and warning that “God … is not pleased with America’s
economic mal-distribution!” Impugning capitalism as a system whose inequities
force “Third World people” to “live in grinding poverty,” Wright derides the
United States as the “land of the greed and home of the slave.” Moreover, he
has praised the socialist magazine Monthly Review for its “no-nonsense
Marxism,” congratulating that publication for “dispel[ling] all the negative
images we have been programmed to conjure up with just the mention of that word
‘socialism’ or ‘Marxism.’”
This same Jeremiah Wright served as a mentor to Barack Obama for
two decades. So great was Obama’s regard for Wright, that Obama selected him
not only to perform his wedding to Michelle Robinson in 1992, but also to
baptize his two daughters later on. Perhaps Obama’s most significant show of
support for Wright’s ministry was his donation of some $27,500 to Trinity
Church during 2005-06. Another report indicates that from 2005-07, Obama gave a
total of $53,770 to Trinity. People simply do not give such large sums of money
to causes in which they do not deeply believe. There is no reason in the world
to suspect that Obama rejected any part of Wright’s message at any time between
1988 and early 2008. He disavowed Wright only when the latter’s radicalism
threatened to become a political liability to Obama’s ambition for the White
House.
Obama and ACORN, a Socialist Organization
In the early to mid-1990s, Obama worked with the (now defunct)
community organization ACORN and its voter-mobilization arm, Project Vote.
Manhattan Institute scholar Sol Stern explains that ACORN, professing a
dedication to “the poor and powerless,” in fact promoted “a 1960s-bred agenda
of anti-capitalism, central planning, victimology, and government handouts to
the poor.” ACORN, Stern elaborates, organized people “to push for ever more government
control of the economy” and to pursue “the ultra-Left’s familiar
anti-capitalist redistributionism.”
In 2010, former ACORN insider Anita MonCrief confirmed the
organization’s unmistakably socialist orientation: “As an ACORN insider my
indoctrination as a socialist was a slow but steady progression from radical
liberalism to embracing the stealth socialist methods that had made ACORN a
powerful force in American electoral politics…. Inside ACORN offices across the
country, young, idealistic liberals were being ingrained with the Saul Alinsky
style of Organizing. Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals was never mentioned by name,
but Alinsky’s tactics were used on employees and ACORN members. ACORN’s
strategy of stealth socialism was aimed at gaining power through duplicity and
somewhat assimilating into society…. I once asked Marcel Reid, former ACORN
national board member and President of DC ACORN, how it was possible for ACORN
to push its agenda and she replied, ‘We never use the word Socialism.’ ACORN’s
appeal was to simply implement a Socialist agenda without ever saying the
word.”
Smitten with Obama’s political and ideological makeup, ACORN in
the early 1990s invited him to help train its staff in the tactics of community
organizing. In 1995, Obama was one of a team of attorneys who sued, on ACORN’s
behalf, for the implementation of a “Motor Voter” law in Illinois. Because
Motor Voter laws allow people to register by mail without requiring that they
provide any form of identification, they are, quite understandably, breeding
grounds for voter-registration fraud. Thus, Jim Edgar, Illinois' Republican
governor, opposed the law.
In a 2007 interview with ACORN representatives,
then-presidential candidate Obama said enthusiastically: “You know you’ve got a
friend in me. And I definitely welcome ACORN’s input…. Since I have been in the
United States Senate I’ve been always a partner with ACORN as well…. I’ve been
fighting with ACORN, alongside ACORN, on issues you care about my entire
career.”
During Obama’s 2008 presidential run, his campaign gave more
than $800,000 to the ACORN front group Citizens’ Services, Inc., to fund
voter-registration efforts.
Obama’s relationship with ACORN remained rock-solid right up
until the organization’s dissolution amid immense scandal (involving
voter-registration fraud, among other matters) in 2010.
Marxists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, Former Weather
Underground Terrorists, Launch Obama's Political Career
It was in the mid-1990s that Obama first decided to try his hand
at electoral politics, setting his sights initially on a state senate seat in
Illinois. Remarkably, Obama launched his political career in the home of two
well-connected Chicagoans, longtime activists who would help the fledgling
politician make important contacts and enlarge his public profile. These two
allies were the infamous Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernardine Dohrn, lifelong
Marxists who in the 1960s and ’70s had been revolutionary leaders of the
Weather Underground Organization, a domestic terror group (described by Ayers
as “an American Red Army”) that aspired to transform the U.S., by means of
violence and even mass murder, into a Communist country. In 1974, while they
were on the FBI's “Most Wanted” list, Ayers and Dohrn co-authored a book that
openly advocated “revolutionary war” as “the only path to the final defeat of
imperialism and the building of socialism”; called for “a revolutionary
communist party … to lead the struggle [to] seize power and build the new
society”; and lauded socialism as the key to “the eradication of the social
system based on profit.” Now, they were the key figures ushering Barack Obama
into a political career.
Obama’s ties to Ayers and Dohrn are extensive. In 1995, Ayers
appointed Obama as the first chairman of his newly created “school reform
organization,” the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, whose stated educational
objective was to “teach against oppression” as embodied in “America’s history
of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation.”
From 1993-2001, Obama served on the board of the Woods Fund of
Chicago, which funded a host of left-wing groups and causes. From 1998-2001,
Ayers served alongside him on that board.
In December 1997, Obama wrote a blurb praising Ayers' recently
published book, A Kind and Just Parent: The Children of Juvenile Court, calling
it “a searing and timely account of the juvenile court system, and the
courageous individuals who rescue hope from despair.”
In August 2014, Barack and Michele Obama attended the wedding of
MSNBC anchor Alex Wagner and White House chef Sam Kass in Pocantico Hills, New
York. Also present at the wedding were Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.
Ayers and Dohrn Have Never Abandoned
Their Marxist, Anti-American Views
Ayers has never changed his Marxist, anti-American worldview. In
2001 he said: “I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough.”
Contemplating whether or not he might again use bombs against the U.S. sometime
in the future, he wrote: “I can’t imagine entirely dismissing the possibility.”
Also in 2001, Ayers expressed his enduring hatred for the United States: “What
a country. It makes me want to puke.”
At a 2007 reunion of former members of the Weather Underground
and Students for a Democratic Society, Ayers reemphasized his contempt for the
U.S., asserting that the nation's chief hallmarks included “oppression,”
“authoritarianism,” and “a kind of rising incipient American form of fascism.”
Moreover, he claimed that the U.S. was guilty of pursuing “empire
unapologetic[ally]”; waging “war without end” against “an undefined enemy
that’s supposed to be a rallying point for a new kind of energized jingoistic
patriotism”; engaging in “unprecedented and unapologetic military expansion”;
oppressing brown- and black-skinned people with “white supremacy”; perpetrating
“violent attacks” against “women and girls”; expanding “surveillance in every
sphere of our lives”; and “targeting ... gay and lesbian people as a kind of a
scapegoating gesture …”
In March 2008 Ayers became vice president for curriculum studies
at the left-wing American Educational Research Association, thereby putting
himself in a position to exert great influence over what is taught in America's
teacher-training colleges and its public schools. Specifically, Ayers seeks to
inculcate teachers-in-training with a “social commitment” to the values of
“Marx,” and with a desire to become agents of social change in K-12 classrooms.
Whereas “capitalism promotes racism and militarism,” Ayers explains, “teaching
invites transformations” and is “the motor-force of revolution.”
Ayers also created, in collaboration with longtime communist
Mike Klonsky, the so-called “Small Schools Movement” (SSM), where individual
schools committed themselves to the promotion of specific political themes and
pushed students to “confront issues of inequity, war, and violence.” A chief goal of SSM is to teach students that
American capitalism is a racist, materialistic doctrine that has done
incalculable harm to societies all over the world.
Dohrn. Likewise, has never changed her Marxist, anti-American
orientation. In November 2007, she spoke at a 40th anniversary celebration of
the Students for a Democratic Society. In her remarks, she praised her fellow
radicals for their long-term efforts aimed at “overthrowing everything hateful
about this government and corporate structure that we live in, capitalism
itself.” Further, Dohrn lamented “the whole structural implications of white
supremacy and the ways in which race and class and gender are just so
intertwined in the United States.”
Obama Tries to Downplay His Close Alliance with Ayers
During the 2008 presidential campaign, when Obama was asked
about his relationship with Bill Ayers, he said that Ayers was just “a guy who
lives in my neighborhood” who happened to have done some bad things “forty
years ago when I was six or seven years old.” He implied that to even raise a
question about that relationship was a mean-spirited, guilt-by-association
political tactic.
Obama's closest advisor, David Axelrod, said: “Bill Ayers lives
in his [Obama's] neighborhood. Their kids attend the same school. They're
certainly friendly, they know each other, as anyone whose kids go to school
together.” But at the time of Axelrod's statement, Ayers' three children were
in their late twenties and early thirties, whereas Obama's two daughters, Sasha
and Malia, were aged six and nine, respectively.
But the enduring nature of Obama’s friendly relationship with
Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn was evidenced by the fact that he attended a
July Fourth barbecue at the couple’s home in 2005, even as the former
terrorists continued to hold America—and capitalism—in utmost contempt.
Obama Gets Support from Alice Palmer, a Pro-Soviet Radical
Another key supporter of Obama’s 1996 entry into politics was
Democratic state senator Alice Palmer of Illinois, who, as she prepared to run
for Congress, hand-picked Obama as the person she hoped would fill her newly
vacated state-senate seat. Toward that end, Palmer introduced Obama to party
elders and donors as her preferred successor, and helped him gather the
signatures required for getting his name placed on the ballot.
Palmer’s background is highly noteworthy: A veteran of the
Midwest Academy, she consistently supported the Soviet Union and spoke out
against the United States during the Cold War. In the 1980s she served as an
official of the U.S. Peace Council, which the FBI identified as a Communist
front group. In 1986 she attended the 27th Congress of the Communist Party of
the Soviet Union and expressed a high regard for the USSR’s system of “central
planning.” And she applauded the Soviets for “carrying out a policy to resolve
the inequalities between nationalities, inequalities that they say were
inherited from capitalist and czarist rule.”
Obama Joins the Socialist “New Party”
During his Illinois state senate campaign in 1996, Obama
actively sought the endorsement of the so-called New Party, a socialist
political coalition whose objective was to promote the election of left-wing
public officials—most often Democrats. The New Party’s short-term goal was to
gradually, incrementally move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting
the stage for the eventual rise of a new socialist third party. As Stanley
Kurtz puts it, the New Party “is best understood as an attempt to build a
mass-based political front for a largely socialist party leadership.”
New Party co-founder Joel Rogers once penned a piece in the
Marxist journal New Left Review, wherein he made it clear that the organization
was a socialist enterprise at its core. Not only was Obama successful in
obtaining the New Party’s endorsement, but he also used a number of New Party
volunteers as campaign workers, and by 1996 Obama himself had become a New
Party member.
Support from Carl Davidson, Marxist
Yet another important Obama ally in 1996 was Carl Davidson, a
major player in the Chicago branch of the New Party. Davidson is a lifelong
Marxist who in the 1960s served as a national secretary of the Students for a
Democratic Society. In 1969 Davidson helped launch the Venceremos Brigades,
which covertly transported hundreds of young Americans to Cuba to help harvest
sugar cane and learn guerrilla warfare techniques from the communist government
of Fidel Castro. In 1988 Davidson founded Networking for Democracy, a program
that encouraged American high-school students to engage in “mass action” aimed
at “tearing down the old structures of race and class privilege” in the United
States “and around the world.” And in 1992 Davidson became a leader of the newly
formed Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, an outgrowth
of the Communist Party USA.
Obama and the Democratic Socialists of America
On February 25, 1996, Obama (who was then a candidate for the
13th Illinois Senate District) was a guest panelist at a “townhall meeting on
economic insecurity,” sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of
America (DSA). His fellow panelists included William Julius Wilson (a longtime
DSA activist from the Center for the Study of Urban Inequality) and DSA
National Political Committee member Joseph Schwartz. In his remarks, Obama
discussed how government could play a “constructive” role in improving society.
“I Actually Believe in Redistribution”
Obama’s commitment to the redistribution of wealth—an
unmistakable hallmark of socialism—is deep, longstanding, and well-documented.
At an October 19, 1998 conference at Loyola University, he said: “There has
been a systematic ... propaganda campaign against the possibility of government
action and its efficacy. And I think some of it has been deserved.... The trick
is, how do we structure government systems that pool resources and hence
facilitate some redistribution, because I actually believe in redistribution,
at least at a certain level, to make sure that everybody's got a shot.”
Viewing the Constitution As an Impediment to “Redistributive
Change”
Obama again clearly articulated his commitment to wealth
redistribution during a guest appearance on Chicago’s WBEZ public radio in
2001, when he was an Illinois state senator. In that interview, Obama lauded
the ability of community organizations “to put together the actual coalitions
of power through which you bring about redistributive change.” He lamented,
however, that the Supreme Court had “never entered into the issues of
redistribution of wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and
economic justice in this society”; that the Court had not been able to “break
free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in
the Constitution,” a document that unfortunately “doesn’t say what the federal
government or the state government must do on your behalf”; and that he himself
was “not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through
the courts,” even though he found it easy to “come up with a rationale for
bringing about economic change through the courts.”
In a penetrating analysis of Obama's remarks, Bill Whittle of
National Review Online writes: “The entire purpose of the Constitution was to
limit government. That limitation of powers is what has unlocked in America the
vast human potential available in any population. Barack Obama sees that
limiting of government not as a lynchpin but rather as a fatal flaw.”
Depicting the Free Market As a Heartless Agent of “Social
Darwinism”
In a 2005 commencement address, Obama described the conservative
philosophy of government as one that promises “to give everyone one big refund
on their government, divvy it up by individual portions, in the form of tax
breaks, hand it out, and encourage everyone to use their share to go buy their
own health care, their own retirement plan, their own child care, their own
education, and so on.” “In Washington,” said Obama, “they call this the
Ownership Society. But in our past there has been another term for it, Social
Darwinism, every man or woman for him or her self. It's a tempting idea,
because it doesn't require much thought or ingenuity.”
Obama Names the Socialist Cornel West to His Black Advisory
Council
When Obama ran for president in 2008, he formed a Black Advisory
Council that included Professor Cornel West—a longtime member of the Democratic
Socialists of America, a former supporter of the now-defunct (socialist) New
Party, and an avid admirer of (the socialist) Jeremiah Wright. Identifying
himself as a “progressive socialist,” West contends that “Marxist thought is an
indispensable tradition for freedom fighters.” Viewing capitalism as the root
cause of America’s “unbridled grasp at power, wealth and status,” West warns:
“Free-market fundamentalism trivializes the concern for public interest. It
puts fear and insecurity in the hearts of anxiety-ridden workers. It also makes
money-driven, poll-obsessed elected officials deferential to corporate goals of
profit—often at the cost of the common good.”
When Obama appeared with Professor West at a Harlem, New York
campaign fundraiser, West introduced him as “my brother and my companion and
comrade.” Obama, in response, called West “a genius, a public intellectual, a
preacher, [and] an oracle.”
Advocating Massive Redistribution of Wealth on a Global Scale
As the Democratic primaries were winding down in May 2008, Obama
quietly steered his Global Poverty Act (GPA), known as S. 2433, through the
U.S. Senate. He characterized the bill as one that required “the president to
develop and implement a comprehensive policy to cut extreme global poverty in
half by 2015 through aid, trade debt relief, and coordination with the
international community, businesses and NGOs (non-governmental organizations).”
According to Accuracy in Media editor Cliff Kincaid, the GPA would make
America's foreign-aid spending decisions “subservient to the dictates of the
United Nations” and, over a 13-year period, would cost the U.S. roughly $845
billion “over and above what [it] already spends.”
Global Wealth Redistribution via Skyrocketing Foreign Aid
From fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2012, with the U.S. economy mired in
a deep recession, the Obama administration increased federal spending on
foreign aid by at least 80%. In fiscal 2008, the government spent a total of
$11.427 billion in international assistance programs. During Obama's
presidency, the corresponding totals have been $14.827 billion in 2009; $20.038
billion in 2010; $20.599 billion in 2011; and $20.058 billion through the first
11 months of fiscal 2012.
Obama Says that Only Government Can Rescue Ailing Economy
On February 6, 2009, President Obama held his first prime-time
press conference, where, in reference to the economic downturn that was
afflicting the U.S., he said: “It is only government that can break the vicious
cycle.”
Support from the Leader of the Communist Party USA
In early February 2009, it was reported that Communist Party USA
leader Sam Webb had recently delivered a major speech about President Obama,
titled “Off and Running: Opportunity of a Lifetime.” Said Webb: “We now have
not simply a friend, but a people’s advocate in the White House…. An era of
progressive change is within reach, no longer an idle dream. Just look at the
new lay of the land: a friend of labor and its allies sits in the White House.”
Venezuela’s Communist President Hugo Chavez Praises Obama's
Socialist Mindset
In a nationally televised, June 2, 2009 speech on the “curse” of
capitalism, Venezuela’s Communist President Hugo Chavez made an approving
reference to Obama's recent move to nationalize General Motors. In a related
remark directed to Chavez's longtime friend and ally Fidel Castro, the
Venezuelan President suggested that Obama's brand of socialism was perhaps more
extreme than that of any other world leader. Said Chavez: “Hey, Obama has just
nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama!
Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his [Obama's] right.”
Obama's Radical Appointees (Revolutionary Communist Van Jones,
etc.)
Obama’s socialist orientation is further manifest in a number of
the political appointments he has made as President. For example:
He named Van Jones—a longtime revolutionary communist who
famously declared that “we [are] gonna change the whole [economic] system”—as
his “green jobs czar” in 2009.
He appointed Carol Browner, a former “commissioner” of the
Socialist International, as his “environment czar.”
He appointed John Holdren—who not only views capitalism as a
system that is inherently destructive of the environment, but strongly favors
the redistribution of wealth, both within the U.S. and across international
borders—as his “science czar.”
He named Hilda Solis, a former officer of the Congressional
Progressive Caucus (the socialist wing of the House of Representatives), as his
labor secretary.
He chose Anita Dunn—a woman who has cited the late Mao Zedong,
China's longtime Communist dictator and the killer of some 60 million people,
as one of her “favorite political philosophers”—to serve as White House
communications director.
The Communist Ties of Obama's Two Closest Political Advisors
Valerie Jarrett, the daughter-in-law of a journalist with ties
to the Communist Party, was largely responsible for persuading the communist
Van Jones, whom she admired tremendously, to join the Obama administration in
2009.
David Axelrod, the chief architect of Obama’s presidential
campaigns, was mentored, as a young man, by the lifelong communist David
Canter. Axelrod’s other mentor, Don Rose, was a member of the National
Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam, an organization replete with
communists and Sixties radicals. Rose also belonged to the Alliance to End
Repression—a suspected Communist Party front—and he did some press work for the
Students for a Democratic Society.
Obama Awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to an Avowed
Socialist
In May 2012, Obama awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom,
the highest honor a civilian can receive, to the iconic union activist Dolores
Huerta. A longtime member of the Democratic Socialists of America, Huerta had
previously won a Eugene Debs Award, named after the man who founded the
Socialist Party of America. On at least one occasion, she was a guest speaker
at a gathering of the Socialist Scholars Conference. And she is an open admirer
of Venezuela’s communist president, Hugo Chavez.
Communist Party USA Backs Obama's Re-election
In June 2012, Marxist John Case, who writes for various
Communist Party USA publications, wrote a piece titled “The Danger of a Romney
Election,” which stated that: “Re-electing Obama is not sufficient to bring
economic recovery or even relief to our people. Only a different class
configuration in political power can do necessary minimum reforms to give us a
chance. But re-electing Obama is absolutely essential. Now is not the time for
hand washing the complexities and tactics away—or failing to triage the most
critical questions from those that are less critical. We cannot win everything
at once!”
Obama's Striking Ideological Resemblance to the Party of
European Socialists
In January 2012, a Forbes magazine piece documented the striking
similarities between President Obama’s political agendas and those of the Party
of European Socialists—particularly as regards the expansion of the welfare
state; government-funded universal access to education and health care; a
progressive taxation system designed to redistribute income and wealth on a
massive scale; a belief that state control is necessary to rein in the “greed”
that underlies market forces which benefit only “the privileged few”; a
reliance on “international institutions” and “international consensus” as the
basis of foreign-policy decisions; and environmental policies that favor
“carbon taxes, higher energy prices, restricted drilling and refining, and
subsidies of green technology … even at the expenses of higher conventional
growth and jobs.”
Concluded Forbes: “If the Party of European Socialists were to
rate Obama, he would get a near-perfect score. The political views and programs
that Obama is prepared to reveal to the public are consistent with those of
European socialists. He is clearly a socialist in the European sense of the
term.”
“The President of the United States Is a Socialist”
Stanley Kurtz, author of Radical-in-Chief, points out that
Obama, from his teenage years to the present, “has lived in a thoroughly socialist
world”; that Obama “never abandoned his early socialist convictions but instead
discreetly retained them, on the model of his colleagues and mentors in the
world of community organizing.” The final sentence of Kurtz’s book is its most
powerful: “The president of the United States is a socialist.”
Important Quotes that Reveal President Obama's Socialist Mindset
Though Obama—in the tradition of the Democratic Socialists of
America, ACORN, and the Midwest Academy—has carefully avoided openly referring
to himself as a socialist, he gives us a glimpse of his mindset every now and
then, particularly when he is busy fomenting class envy, demonizing financial
prosperity, and advocating wholesale wealth redistribution. Recall, for
instance:
when Obama famously told Joe Wurzelbacher (“Joe the Plumber”),
during the 2008 campaign, that a tax increase on small businesses would be
justified because “when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody”;
when he told an Illinois audience in April 2010, “I do think at
a certain point you’ve made enough money”;
when he made any one of his innumerable disparaging references
to “the top 1 percent,” the “millionaires and billionaires,” the “fat-cat
bankers,” and the “corporate jet owners” who are “sitting pretty” as they live
lavishly at the expense of “the bottom 90 percent”;
when he flatly rejected “this brand of ‘you’re-on-your-own’
economics” in January 2012;
when he condemned the “ever-widening chasm between the
ultra-rich and everybody else”;
when he advocated “a new vision of an America in which
prosperity is shared”;
when he congratulated the anti-capitalist Occupy Wall Street
radicals for “inspir[ing]” him, reminding him “what we are still fighting for,”
and being “the reason why I ran for this office in the first place”;
when he claimed: “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build
that. Somebody else made that happen”—a reference to the government-funded
“roads and bridges” that presumably made it possible for the business to
thrive;
and when he said, during the closing statement of his October 3,
2012 presidential debate with Mitt Romney, that he sought to create an America
where “everybody's getting a fair shot, and everybody's getting a fair share.”
He then quickly corrected himself: “[E]verybody's doing a fair share, and
everybody's playing by the same rules.”
The Quest to “Fundamentally Transform” America, “Brick by Brick,
Block by Block”
Five days before the 2008 presidential election, again Obama
articulated his intent to “fundamentally transform” the United States. Earlier
in the campaign, he had pledged to “remake the world as it should be,” and to
“change this country, brick by brick, block by block.” Earlier still, he had
told an audience of supporters that “we’re not just going to win an election
but more importantly we’re going to transform this nation.” These ominous
proclamations sit at the very heart of the socialist mindset, the grandiose
quest to tear down the status quo and erect a new, utopian world upon the
scattered rubble of its despised ruins.
Those quotes echo what Obama had said many years earlier, in an
interview published by the Daily Herald on March 3, 1990: “I feel good when I'm
engaged in what I think are the core issues of the society, and those core
issues to me are what's happening to poor folks in this society.... Hopefully,
more and more people will begin to feel their story is somehow part of this
larger story of how we're going to reshape America in a way that is less
mean-spirited and more generous. I mean, I really hope to be part of a
transformation of this country.”
An Illustration of Obama's Embrace of Incremental Socialism
The strategy of settling for incrementalism rather than sudden,
sweeping revolution was displayed with vivid clarity during the healthcare
debates of 2009-10. Obama was already on record as having stated emphatically,
in a 2003 speech at an AFL-CIO event: “I happen to be a proponent of a
single-payer, universal health care plan”—i.e., a government-run system.
But by 2007, with the White House clearly within his reach,
Obama began to make allowances for the increasingly evident fact that a
single-payer plan was not politically palatable to a large enough number of
American voters. “I don’t think we’re going to be able to eliminate employer
coverage immediately,” he said in May 2007. “There’s going to be potentially
some transition process. I can envision a decade out, or 15 years out, or 20
years out.”
He made similar references to a “transition step” and “a
transitional system” on other occasions during the campaign. In the summer of
2008, Obama declared that “if I were designing a system from scratch, I would
probably go ahead with a single-payer system,” but acknowledged that from a
practical standpoint, such a result could only come about “over time.”
Obamacare, then, was deliberately designed to be a stepping
stone toward total government control of healthcare—a mere way station along
the road toward the “radical ends” that the president ultimately sought to
achieve.
A Successful Businessman Expresses His Resentment of Obama's
Class-Warfare Rhetoric
In October 2012, Steve Wynn, CEO of Wynn Resorts told political
commentator/TV host Jon Ralston: “I've created about 250,000 direct and
indirect jobs according to the state of Nevada's measurement. If the number is
250,000, that's exactly 250,000 more than this president, who I'll be damned if
I want to have him lecture me about small business and jobs. I'm a job creator.
Guys like me are job creators and we don't like having a bulls-eye painted on
our back. The president is trying to put himself between me and my employees.
By class warfare, by deprecating and calling a group that makes money
'billionaires and millionaires who don't pay their share.' I gave 120% of my
salary and bonus away last year to charities, as I do most years. I can't stand
the idea of being demagogued, that is put down, by a president who has never
created any jobs and who doesn't even understand how the economy works.”
LIVING LIKE ROYALTY, PERPETUALLY FUNDRAISING
(Return to Table of Contents)
Taxpayers Spend $1.4 Billion Annually on the Obama Family
In 2011, American taxpayers spent $1.4 billion on everything
from staffing, housing, flying and entertaining President Obama and his family;
by contrast, British taxpayers spent just $57.8 million on the royal family. In
his 2012 book Presidential Perks Gone Royal, author Robert Keith Gray writes
that the $1.4 billion figure included the president's innumerable flights on an
Air Force One that was “running with the frequency of a scheduled air line.”
“The most concerning thing,” said Gray, was “the use of taxpayer funds to
actually abet his re-election”—most notably by using Air Force One to
criss-cross the country campaigning and fundraising.
Barack and Michelle Obama Take Two Separate Jets to Vacation
Spot in Martha's Vineyard
One of the innumerable examples of the Obamas' lack of respect
for American taxpayers occurred on August 19, 2011, when the President and his
family flew to Martha's Vineyard for a ten-day vacation at a $50,000-per-week
rented estate. They traveled on two separate jets, with the First Lady and the
two Obama children arriving four hours earlier than the President. At much
extra cost to taxpayers, Mrs. Obama (along with any extra staff and Secret
Service personnel that had to be enlisted to go with her) traveled on a
specially designed military aircraft instead of with her husband on Air Force
One. She also had her own motorcade escorting her from the airport to her
vacation residence. According to NewsBusters.com: “This is not the first time
Michelle has gone on vacation ahead of the president on the taxpayers’ tab.
Last December, she racked up what was likely more than $100,000 in expenses
leaving early for their Hawaii vacation.”
The Perpetual Fundraiser
Between April 14, 2011 (the day he hosted the first fundraiser
of his re-election campaign) and August 24, 2012, President Obama attended only
198 of his daily intelligence briefings. During that same period, he held at
least 203 fundraising events. In fact, he held more re-election fundraisers
than the previous five presidents combined—Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George
H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush.
DERIDING AMERICA ON THE WORLD STAGE ("APOLOGY TOUR")
(Return to Table of Contents)
Likening the Jim Crow South to Nazi Germany
In a January 18, 2001 radio interview, Obama said that the
doctrines of WWII-era Nazism were “uncomfortably similar to what [was] going
on, back here at home” in the Jim Crow South.
In Response to 9/11, Obama Calls for More U.S. Foreign Aid
Eight days after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
Obama asserted that the attacks had grown out of “a climate of poverty and
ignorance, helplessness and despair”; exhorting Americans to be “unwavering in
opposing bigotry or discrimination directed against neighbors and friends of
Middle Eastern descent”; and urging the U.S. “to devote far more attention to
the monumental task of raising the hopes and prospects of embittered children
across the globe.”
Accusing the U.S. of “Just Air-Raiding Villages and Killing
Civilians”
In August 2007, Obama suggested that as a result of President
Bush’s poor military leadership, U.S. troops in Afghanistan had done a
disservice to their mission by “just air raiding villages and killing
civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.”
“All Too Often the United States Starts by Dictating”
Six days after his inauguration, Barack Obama granted his first
television interview as U.S. President to Al Arabiya, a Dubai-based network
owned, in part, by the Saudi government. During that interview:
Obama said: “All too often the United States starts by dictating
... and we don’t always know all the factors that are involved. So let’s
listen.”
Obama apologized to the Muslim world for former President Bush’s
use of the term “Islamic fascism.” Said Obama: “[T]he language we use matters.
And what we need to understand is, is that there are extremist
organizations—whether Muslim or any other faith in the past—that will use faith
as a justification for violence. We cannot paint with a broad brush a faith as
a consequence of the violence that is done in that faith’s name.”
Obama said the Islamic world’s ill will toward the United States
was a result of the Bush administration’s “cowboy diplomacy,” which had eroded
Muslims’ faith in the purity of U.S. intentions. “We are looking at the region
as a whole and communicating a message to the Arab world and the Muslim world,”
he said, “that we are ready to initiate a new partnership based on mutual
respect and mutual interest.”
Rejecting the Practice of America “Simply Dictating Solutions”
At a news conference during the G-20 Summit in April 2009, Obama
tried to distinguish his own policies from those of the Bush administration by
issuing a verbal slap at his predecessor in the White House: “I just think in a
world that is as complex as it is, that it is very important for us to be able
to forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions.”
“America Has Shown Arrogance”
In April 3, 2009 speech in Strasbourg, France, Obama criticized
his home country by saying: “In America, there’s a failure to appreciate
Europe‘s leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union
and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been
times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”
Dismissing “American Exceptionalism”
On April 4, 2009 in Strasbourg, France, Obama was asked whether
he believed in the concept of American exceptionalism. He replied: “I believe
in American exceptionalism just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British
exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism.”
America's “Legacies of Slavery and Segregation”
In an April 7, 2009 speech to the Turkish Parliament, Obama
said: “The United States is still working through some of our own darker
periods in our history. Facing the Washington Monument that I spoke of is a
memorial of Abraham Lincoln, the man who freed those who were enslaved even
after Washington led our Revolution. Our country still struggles with the
legacies of slavery and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans.”
America's Tendency to “Dictate Our Terms”
On April 17, 2009 in Tobago, Obama said: “We have at times been
disengaged, and at times sought to dictate our terms.”
Obama Fails to Defend America against Verbal Assaults by Daniel
Ortega and Hugo Chavez
When President Obama traveled to Tobago in April 2009 to meet
with Latin American leaders, he sat through a 50-minute diatribe by Nicaragua’s
Communist President Daniel Ortega, who charged that the U.S. had been guilty of
expansionist aggression for at least a century. In particular, Noriega
condemned President John F. Kennedy’s Bay of Pigs effort to overthrow the Cuban
government of Fidel Castro. When asked afterward what he thought of Ortega’s
speech, Obama replied, “It was 50 minutes long. That’s what I thought.”
When Obama himself later addressed those attending the
conference, he did not defend his country against Ortega’s accusations.
Instead, he took the occasion to rebuke America: “While the United States has
done much to promote peace and prosperity in the hemisphere, we have at times
been disengaged, and at times we sought to dictate our terms.” He also said,
humorously: “I’m grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for things
that happened [the Bay of Pigs] when I was three months old.” (It bears mention
that Obama’s chronology was flawed. The Bay of Pigs invasion occurred in April
1961; Obama was not born until August of that year.)
Also in Tobago, Venezuela’s Communist President Hugo Chavez
gifted Obama a copy of The Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of
Pillage of a Continent—a book-length diatribe by Eduardo Galeano that described
the U.S. under President Bush as “a terrorist menace” and a “machine of killing
peoples” that was voraciously “devouring the world resources … each day.” Obama
accepted the book politely and later said, “I think it was, it was a nice
gesture to give me a book. I’m a reader.”
This was the same Hugo Chavez who had told an Iranian audience
three years earlier: “Let's save the human race, let's finish off the U.S.
empire. This [task] must be assumed with strength by the majority of the
peoples of the world.” On other recent occasions, Chavez had called the U.S.
“the greatest threat looming over our planet,” a nation whose “hegemonic
pretensions ... are placing at risk the very survival of the human species.” He
had referred to President Bush as “the Devil” and an aspiring “world dictator.”
And he had asserted that “the government of the United States doesn't want
peace,” but rather “wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of
hegemony through war.”
Accusing President Bush of Having “Trimmed Facts and Evidence to
Fit Ideological Predispositions”
In a May 21, 2009 speech Regarding the War on Terror, Obama
said: “Unfortunately, faced with an uncertain threat, our government made a
series of hasty decisions. In other words, we went off course. I believe that
many of these decisions were motivated by a sincere desire to protect the
American people. But I also believe that all too often our government made
decisions based on fear rather than foresight, that all too often our
government trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions.”
America Acted “Unilaterally Without Regard for the Interests of
Others”
On September 23, 2009, President Obama addressed the UN General
Assembly for the first time. In that speech, he made an effort to differentiate
his own presidency and policies from those of his predecessor, George W. Bush:
“I took office at a time when many around the world had come to
view America with skepticism and distrust. A part of this was due to
misperceptions and misinformation about my country. Part of this was due to
opposition to specific policies and a belief on, on certain critical issues,
America had acted unilaterally without regard for the interests of others.”
“On my first day in office, I prohibited without expectation or
equivocation the use of torture by the United States of America.”
“I ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed.”
“America has, too often, been selective in its promotion of
democracy.”
State Department Issues Veiled Apology to Rioters Who Stormed
U.S. Embassy in Egypt
On September 11, 2012, Islamist protesters stormed the U.S.
Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, where they destroyed the American flag and replaced it
with a black Islamist flag that read, “There is one God, Allah, and Mohammad is
his prophet.” The protesters said they were angry over a film that was critical
of the Prophet Muhammad and had been produced in the U.S. In response to the mayhem, the State
Department issued a veiled apology to those Muslims whose “religious feelings”
had supposedly been “hurt” by “those [i.e., people like the filmmaker] who
abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of
others.”
OBAMA AND ISRAEL
(Return to Table of Contents)
The Most Anti-Israel President in American History
Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren said in 2010, “Israel’s ties
with the United States are in their worst crisis since 1975 ... a crisis of
historic proportions.”
Author and scholar Dennis Prager concurred, “Most observers,
right or left, pro-Israel or anti-Israel, would agree that Israeli-American
relations are the worst they have been in memory.”
In the spring of 2011, David Parsons, spokesman for the
International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, said: “There's a traditional,
special relationship between America and Israel that Obama is basically
throwing out the window in a sense.”
David Rubin, a U.S.-born Israeli author and an expert on the
Middle East, put it this way: “President Obama is very harmful for Israel and
very dangerous for the future of Judeo-Christian civilization.”
The author and economist Thomas Sowell asserts that Obama's
relationship with Israel has been consistent with the president's pattern of
“selling out our allies to curry favor with our adversaries.”
Political analyst Charles Krauthammer observes that Obama has
“undermined” Israel as a result of either his “genuine antipathy” toward the
Jewish state or “the arrogance of a blundering amateur.”
In October 2012, Israeli lawmaker Danny Danon, chairman of
Likud’s international outreach branch, said that Obama has “not been a friend
of Israel,” and that the President's policies have been “catastrophic.”
Meanwhile, the Israeli populace is jittery. According to a 2010
poll commissioned by The Jerusalem Post, only 9% of Jewish Israelis saw the
Obama administration as being more pro-Israel than pro-Palestinian.
The following section of this report lays out Obama's words,
actions, and key affiliations vis à vis Israel—not only during his time in the
White House, but during the two decades preceding his presidency as well.
Obama's Longtime Association with the Anti-Semitic Jeremiah
Wright
For nearly two decades, Barack Obama was a member of Rev.
Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC) in Chicago. Obama
described Wright as his “spiritual advisor,” his “mentor,” and “one of the
greatest preachers in America.” On December 4, 2007, Wright was named as a
member of the Obama presidential campaign's newly created African American
Religious Leadership Committee.
What Wright Has Said About Israel and Jews
Wright has long been a vocal critic of Israel and Zionism, which
he has blamed for inflicting “injustice and … racism” on the Palestinian
people. According to Wright, Zionism contains an element of “white racism.”
Likening Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians to South
Africa’s treatment of blacks during the apartheid era, Wright advocates
divestment campaigns targeting companies that conduct any business in, or with,
Israel.
Wright has referred to Israel as a “dirty word,” asserting that
“ethnic cleansing [by] the Zionist is a sin and a crime against humanity.”
At a May 18, 2009 anti-Israel rally in a Chicago suburb, Wright
and former Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers jointly addressed a
crowd of more than 400 people just prior to participating in an annual walk
designed to call attention to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Asked by an interviewer in June 2009 whether he had spoken to
President Obama since the latter had taken his oath of office five months
earlier, Wright replied: “Them Jews aren't going to let him [Obama] talk to
me.... They will not let him to talk to somebody who calls a spade what it
is.... I said from the beginning: He's a politician; I'm a pastor. He's got to
do what politicians do.”
Wright went on to condemn Israel, saying: “Ethnic cleansing is
going on in Gaza. Ethnic cleansing [by] the Zionist is a sin and a crime
against humanity, and they don't want Barack talking like that because that's
[supposedly] anti-Israel.”
Obama's Ties to Rashid Khalidi and the Arab American Action
Network
During his Illinois state senate years in the mid- to late
1990s, Barack Obama was a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School,
where he became friendly with Rashid Khalidi, a professor of Near Eastern
Languages and Civilizations. Khalidi was once an operative of the Palestine Liberation
Organization, the political apparatus of Yasser Arafat, the godfather of
20th-century terrorism and the most prolific Jew-killer since Adolf Hitler.
Obama and his wife were regular dinner guests at Khalidi’s Hyde Park home.
Characterizing Israel as a “racist” state and “basically an
apartheid system in creation,” in 1995 Khalidi and his wife founded the Arab
American Action Network (AAAN), noted for its contention that Israel’s creation
in 1948 was a "catastrophe" for Arab people. In 2001 and again in
2002, the Woods Fund of Chicago, with Obama serving on its board, made grants
totaling $75,000 to the AAAN.
In 2003 Obama attended a farewell party in Khalidi’s honor when
the latter was preparing to leave Chicago to embark on a new position at
Columbia University. At that event, Obama paid public tribute to Khalidi as
someone whose insights had been “consistent reminders to me of my own blind
spots and my own biases.” Khalidi later told the largely pro-Palestinian
attendees that Obama deserved their help in winning a U.S. Senate seat,
stating: “You will not have a better senator under any circumstances.”
Obama's Ties to Ali Abunimah, Former VP of the Arab American
Action Network
Onetime AAAN vice president Ali Abunimah is a co-founder of
Electronic Intifada, a website that, like AAAN, refers to Israel’s creation as
a “catastrophe.” Abunimah believes that Palestinian violence is caused entirely
by Israel's perpetration of “land confiscation,” its “ongoing orgy of
violence,” its “routine human-rights abuses,” its practice of “apartheid” and
“ethnic cleansing,” and its “attempted genocide” against the
Palestinians—transgressions that have left Israel with “a profound and
irreversible lack” of legitimacy.
In 2008 Abunimah told interviewer Amy Goodman: “I knew Barack
Obama for many years as my state senator—when he used to attend events in the
Palestinian community in Chicago all the time. I remember personally
introducing him onstage in 1999, when we had a major community fundraiser for
the community center in Deheisha refugee camp in the occupied West Bank. And
that’s just one example of how Barack Obama used to be very comfortable
speaking up for and being associated with Palestinian rights and opposing the
Israeli occupation.”
In June 2007 Abunimah recalled: “When Obama first ran for the
Senate in 2004, the Chicago Jewish News interviewed him on his stance regarding
Israel’s security fence. He accused the Bush administration of neglecting the
‘Israeli-Palestinian’ situation and criticized the security fence built by
Israel to prevent terror attacks: ‘The creation of a wall dividing the two
nations is yet another example of the neglect of this administration in
brokering peace,’ Obama was quoted as saying.”
Also in 2007, Abunimah said: “The last time I spoke to Obama was
in the winter of 2004 at a gathering in Chicago’s Hyde Park neighborhood. He
was in the midst of a primary campaign to secure the Democratic nomination for
the United States Senate seat he now occupies. But at that time polls showed
him trailing. As he came in from the cold and took off his coat, I went up to
greet him. He responded warmly, and volunteered, ‘Hey, I’m sorry I haven’t said
more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race. I’m hoping
when things calm down I can be more up front.’ He referred to my activism,
including columns I was contributing to the The Chicago Tribune critical of
Israeli and U.S. policy, ‘Keep up the good work!’”
Candidate Obama Publicly Criticizes Israel's Conservative Likud
Party
In February 2008, then-presidential candidate Obama told an
audience in Cleveland: “There is a strain within the pro-Israel community that
says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel, that you're
anti-Israel.” When Obama made that assertion, Likud had already been out of
power for two years, and the country was being led by the centrist Kadima
government which had been pursuing territorial compromise of unprecedented
magnitude. Moreover, as the Wall Street Journal points out: “It was under Likud
that Israel made its largest territorial compromises—withdrawals from Sinai and
Gaza.”
Candidate Obama's Reluctance to Publicly Refer to Terrorism
Against Israel
When running for President, then-Senator Obama referred, in his
July 2008 speech in Berlin, to the need to “dismantle the [terrorist] networks
that have struck in Madrid and Amman; in London and Bali; in Washington and New
York.” Remarkably, he made no mention of Israel.
Choosing the Leader of a Muslim Brotherhood-Affiliated Group to
Recite a Prayer at His 2009 Inauguration
Obama selected Ingrid Mattson—then-president of the Islamic
Society of North America (ISNA), a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group that had
previously been named as an un-indicted co-conspirator in a case investigating the
illegal funding of Hamas terrorists—to recite a prayer during his inauguration
ceremonies in January 2009. The Muslim Brotherhood, which is the ideological
forebear of both Hamas and al Qaeda, openly promotes the establishment of a
worldwide Islamic caliphate and advocates the destruction of Israel. Later that
year, Obama sent his senior adviser, Valerie Jarrett, to be the keynote speaker
at ISNA’s national convention.
President Obama's First Call to a Foreign Leader Was to
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas
Two days after his inauguration, President Obama placed his
first phone call to a foreign leader—Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud
Abbas, who had repeatedly emphasized the importance of “implementing the
principles of Yasser Arafat,” and had authorized lump-sum payments of $2,200
apiece to the surviving family members of Palestinian suicide bombers. Further,
Abbas has praised the terrorist group Hezbollah as a shining example of “Arab
resistance” against alleged Israeli oppression; he has lauded Palestinian
terrorists as “strugglers” and “martyrs” whom “Allah loves”; he has steadfastly
refused to recognize Israel's right to exist; he has headed the Fatah Party,
whose Charter advocates terrorism against, and the annihilation of, Israel; he
has urged Palestinians to “unite the Hamas and Fatah blood in the struggle
against Israel as we did at the beginning of the Intifada.”
No comments:
Post a Comment