Hillary Clinton Takes her Best Shot at Dictatorship in America The Democratic Iran Nuclear Bomb, ObamaCare, Benghazi, Fast & Furious, and more are on the Menu

It's no secret that Hillary Clinton is a liar.

It’s no secret that Hillary Clinton is the strongest candidate that the Democrats have in the build up to the 2016 presidential elections. But there are many who will question whether Clinton has too much political “baggage” to win the presidency, a la scandals. Indeed, Clinton has been no stranger to scandals in her long political career, and these very scandals may be the precise issues that will cost her the election in 2016. Americans have been known to tolerate a scandal or two … but most of us don’t take kindly to repeat offenders. Clinton is certainly a repeat offender when it comes to scandals, so let’s take a look at the main ones that may end up costing her the presidency.

Clinton’s private emails while serving as Obama’s Secretary of State are at the forefront of her most recent political scandal. Let’s lay some background first: after Obama appointed Hillary Clinton to be his first Secretary of State, she elected to use a private email address for her official State Department business as opposed to the traditional government-assigned email. Her decision to use a private email address while at the White House only came to light in 2015, but it’s already quickly sent shockwaves throughout Washington D.C. and the nation.

This is a significant scandal for Hillary Clinton to deal with, because if true, it would seem that she had openly defied the Federal Records Act while serving as Secretary of State, which mandates that all State Department officials use government-assigned email addresses so as to maintain oversight, ease investigations, and prevent governmental abuses and corruption. The Federal Records Act was optimized in 2014 in order to ensure that the law covered all electronic communications, so it appears as if there is no way for Hillary to get around the fact that she openly disregarded the law during her tenure at the State Department.

Why the big deal? Well, using a personal email address as opposed to a government-assigned email address indicates that Clinton wanted to keep her endeavors at the State Department off-the-books, so to speak. Why? Perhaps because she was involved in activities that would jeopardize her impending presidential campaign, such as her role in the Benghazi crisis or her knowledge of the NSA’s questionable wire-intercept practices. We can’t be sure what she was hiding yet, but it must be something significant if she felt the need to disregard federal law in order to cover her tracks.


his scandal just recently came to light, and it could be a very damaging one for Clinton. Here’s a brief introduction to the case: in 2012, the Haitian government awarded a gold-mining permit for its Morne Bassa mine to a North Carolina company called VCS Mining. What’s notable about this permit is the fact that the government has not issued a similar permit in over 50 years, and what’s also strange is that VCS Mining will only pay 2.5% royalties to the Haitian government for this permit, which mining experts say is drastically lower than the average mining royalty rate. So what gives?

Well suprise, surprise. Hillary Clinton’s brother, Anthony Rodham, was a member of VCS Mining’s board of directors at the time that the company was awarded the Morne Bassa permit. And the permit came in the wake of Bill Clinton raising millions of dollars for the nation of Haiti’s rebuilding efforts after the country was devastated by an earthquake in 2010. And guess who was another member of VCS Mining’s board? Jean-Max Bellerive, who was the former Prime Minister for Haiti and the Bill Clinton’s c0-chair at the Interim Haiti Recovery Commision.  Furthermore, to date USAID has contributed over 3 billion dollars to Haiti since 2010. So what’s this all mean?


It would appear that through their vigorous financial relief and fundraising efforts, Hillary and Bill Clinton “bought” the Morne Bassa gold-mining permit from the Haitian government for Anthony Rodham’s company, VCS Mining. If true, this is an incendiary event that should be fully investigated and prosecuted. American politicians should be above using their positions to do lucrative favors for their family, so this could be a devastating scandal for both Clintons, but particularly for Hillary as she gears up for a presidential run. It’s unclear what will come of the Haiti scandal, but what is clear is that this incident can severely damage Hillary’s reputation

Hillary Clinton took a lot of her flak for her mismanagement of the Benghazi incident, so let’s start with some background information. On September 11, 2012, Islamic attackers raided and destroyed much of the American embassy in Benghazi, Libya. This act of terrorism cost the lives of 4 Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens, who was the first American ambassador to die at the hands of combatants since 1979. So what was Hillary’s role in these events?


In the weeks before the attack, American officials at the Benghazi consulate had repeatedly asked Hillary Clinton’s State Department to beef up security at the location, though the State Department repeatedly denied these requests. The CIA and Ambassador Stevens had warned the State Department that an attack might be imminent, but still Hillary Clinton’s State Department decided to do nothing about it. Clinton’s negligence ended up costing the lives of four Americans, and the State Department failed to report the number of times that it had been warned about an attack. So what does this mean for Hillary?

Benghazi is a potent stain on Clinton’s legacy. She attempted to blur the reality of the attack by having her aide, Victoria Nuland, remove any mention of terrorism or Ambassador Steven’s warnings from all official government reports on the incident. Why, you ask? Because she knew that her approval ratings would be devastated if it came to light that she had an opportunity to prevent the attacks but openly chose not to. Her political mismanagement or ignorant negligence cost the lives of innocent Americans, and the American public will not forget this in 2016


When Hillary Clinton was still running for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2007, she made the puzzling move of hiring Sandy Berger as a personal adviser. Who is Sandy Berger, you ask? Well, he is a previously convicted criminal was charged and found guilty of smuggling sensitive files out of the National Archives and thereafter destroying them. The files were related to the 9/11 Commission’s report, and specifically the files Berger destroyed pertained to Bill Clinton’s failure to contain terrorists during his presidency. This was an extremely questionable and unflattering political move on Hillary’s part, and the American people will not forget her decision to surround herself with a criminal.


Well, this scandal is pretty straightforward and is indicative of Hillary Clinton’s unflinching tendency to withhold the truth. In the picture above, the man located to the right side of Bill Clinton is a fellow by the name of Peter Paul. In the year 2000, Peter Paul made an extremely large donation to Hillary Clinton’s Senate Campaign. When the Federal Election Commission examined the donation, they discovered that Hillary Clinton significantly under-reported the size of Paul’s donation, meaning that thousands of dollars of illegal cash likely ended up in her campaign funds. Even though such an act can bring several years in prison, nothing ever happened to Hillary. This scandal is just another incident that reveals her willingness to consistently hide the truth


Julian Assange (pictured above) and his organization WikiLeaks revealed in 2010 that Hillary Clinton’s State Department issued an order that mandated for all U.N. officials to be consequently spied on in order to illegally gain passwords, credit card details, DNA, iris scan, and more. International condemnation ensued after Assange’s revelation of this order, but Clinton consequently claimed to have no knowledge about this nefarious order even though her signature was affixed to the bottom of the document. This scandal greatly embarrassed Clinton, but more importantly it embarrassed America


This is another of Hillary Clinton’s scandals that is just downright low. While serving as the Secretary of State, Clinton interceded 6 times in federal affairs in favor of companies that had directly contributed to Bill Clinton’s not-for-profit foundation. At best, this is woeful negligence on Hillary’s part. At the worst, it is a blatant example of Hillary Clinton’s willingness to “scratch the backs” of those who help her and her husband. This kind of nefarious unethical action should have no place in Washington D.C., and the American people will certainly take note of this scandal during the presidential elections in 2016.


While it is clear that Hillary Clinton is currently the Democrat’s best shot at the presidency in 2016, it says a lot about the Democrats when their potential candidate has been involved in as many scandals as Hillary. With this in mind, it is conceivable that these scandals could potentially even cost her the Democratic nomination for the presidency in 2016, if her peers decide to hammer her on the many nefarious incidents that she has been involved in. In light of these scandals, it is impossible to dispute that Hillary has a consistent tendency to lie, aide political allies, and mismanage crises. Such tendencies may very well cost Clinton the presidency in 2016, but it will be through no one’s fault but her own