Incidentally, Hillary Clinton cheated in Iowa. Coin Toss Clinton should be in the life insurance business

Coin Toss Clinton should be in the life insurance business.  The statistical chances of winning all those coin tosses in Iowa is some form of mathematical magic, says our expert.  Coin Toss Hillary Clinton found that mysterious orderliness in the random jumble of coin tosses in Iowa and won every one of them, just like her investments in some kind of cattle futures scam years ago. 

The statistical truth is, its impossible to win all those random coin tosses.  There is no need in Hillary Clinton, the current leader of the Clinton Crime Family to enter politics but we're starting to learn why Wall-Street would give her $675,000. to make a speech.

It's clear that she could fix the trends in the stock markets around the world let alone population trends or maybe the sex life of fruit flies.  A woman that can win all those coin tosses in Iowa could work for the census people, the IRS and simply sit around and make predictions or set the odds in Las Vegas. 

We all know that Hillary Clinton really wanted to marry Vince Foster, Sleep with Webb Hubbell so her ability to predict things must be new, as she's lost so many times.

As the courtship of the Billionaire Hillary Clinton continues you might want to consider her chances of going to jail or if she's healthy enough to complete her prison term.  

Incidentally, Hillary cheated in Iowa.

The Iowa caucus bylaws state that when a vote is too close to count and/or there is a tie, the vote can be determined by a coin toss. In the case of Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernard Sanders a coin toss was used for at least six precincts.

And Clinton won all 6 coin tosses. The probability that anyone could win consecutively six coin tosses is only 1.6 percent. calculates: “(1/2)^6, which is 1/64 — or 1.6 percent.”

Consider the odds even if Sanders had won half of the coin flips– splitting the six county delegates (3/3) with Clinton, Sanders would have beaten Clinton, winning 698.49 delegates to Clinton’s 696.57.

According to associate professor of sociology at Iowa State University, David Schweingruber, (who told The Des Moines Register) explained that by just doing simple math, roughly 60 delegates are missing from the total. For example, in Ames, 484 eligible caucus attendees were initially recorded. Yet after each group was counted, Clinton had 240 supporters, Sanders had 179, and Martin O’Malley had five. These numbers total 424, not 484.